Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inhibition contributes to orientation selectivity in visual cortex of cat

Abstract

Neurons in the visual cortex are selectively responsive to light or dark bars presented at particular orientations1. On the basis of physiological data, this orientation selectivity is hypothesized as being due at least partially to intracortical inhibitory mechanisms2–6. But this hypothesis has been challenged by intracellular recordings indicating that excitatory inputs themselves are orientation-selective, so inhibition may not contribute to the observed selectivity7. Also, there is controversy about the presence of intracortical horizontal connections mediating inhibition for selectivity8–11 and about the theoretical validity of such inhibitory connections12–14. Using cross-correlation analysis of the activities of two neurons recorded simultaneously, we find that inhibitory interactions exist between cells with somewhat different, but not orthogonal, orientation preferences. This suggests that intracortical horizontal inhibition operates between 'orientation columns' to sharpen the orientation tuning of cortical neurons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Physiol., Lond. 160, 106–154 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, P. O., Coombs, J. S. & Henry, G. H. J. Physiol., Lond. 219, 659–687 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blakemore, C. & Tobin, E. A. Expl Brain Res. 15, 439–440 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benevento, L. A., Creutzfeldt, O. D. & Kuhnt, V. Nature 238, 124–126 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sillito, A. M. J. Physiol., Lond. 250, 305–329 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsumoto, T., Eckart, W. & Creutzfeldt, O. D. Expl Brain Res. 34, 351–363 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferster, D. J. Neurosci. 6, 1284–1301 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsubara, J., Cynader, M., Swindale, N. V. & Stryker, M. P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 935–939 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ts'o, D. Y., Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Neurosci. 6, 1160–1170 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kisvarday, Z. F. et al. Expl Brain Res. 64, 541–552 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. LeVay, S. J. comp. Neurol 269, 265–274 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rose, D. Vision Res. 19, 533–544 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch, C. & Poggio, T. in Models of the Visual Cortex (eds Rose, D. & Dobson, V. G.) 408–419 (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koch, C. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 13, 1451 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsumoto, T., Masui, H. & Sato, H. J. Neurophysiol. 55, 469–483 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. J. comp. Neurol. 158, 267–294 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Albus, K. Expl Brain Res. 24, 181–202 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoppmann, A. & Stryker, M. P. Nature 293, 574–576 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore, G. P., Segundo, J. P., Perkel, D. H. & Levitan, H. Biophys. J. 10, 876–900 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bryant Jr, H. L., Marcos, A. R. & Segundo, J. P. J. Neurophysiol. 36, 205–225 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Toyama, K., Kimura, M. & Tanaka, K. J. Neurophysiol. 46, 202–214 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Michalski, A., Gerstein, G. L., Czarkowska, J. & Tarnecki, R. Expl Brain Res. 51, 97–107 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aertsen, A. H. J. & Gerstein, G. L. J. Brain Res. 340, 341–354 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsubara, J. A., Cynader, M. S. & Swindale, N. V. J. Neurosci. 7, 1428–1446 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Somogyi, P., Kisvarday, Z. F., Martin, K. A. C. & Whitteridge, D. Neuroscience 10, 261–294 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kisvarday, Z. F., Martin, K. A. C., Whitteridge, D. & Somogyi, P. J. comp. Neurol. 241, 111–137 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blakemore, C., Carpenter, R. H. S. & Georgeson, M. A. Nature 228, 37–39 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C. & Maffei, L. Proc. R. Soc. B216, 335–354 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramoa, A. S., Shadlen, M., Skottun, B. C. & Freeman, R. D. Nature 321, 237–239 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Douglas, R. J., Martin, K. A. C. & Whitteridge, D. Nature 332, 642–644 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hata, Y., Tsumoto, T., Sato, H. et al. Inhibition contributes to orientation selectivity in visual cortex of cat. Nature 335, 815–817 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/335815a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/335815a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing