Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Ecology

Global amphibian population declines

Abstract

The decline and disappearance of relatively undisturbed populations of amphibians in several high-altitude regions since the 1970s suggests that they may have suffered a global decline, perhaps with a common cause or causes1,2,3. Houlahan et al.4 examined means of trends for 936 amphibian populations and concluded that global declines began in the late 1950s, peaked in the 1960s, and have continued at a reduced rate since. Here we re-analyse their data using a method that accounts for the sampling of different populations over different time periods, and find evidence of a mean global decline in monitored populations only in the 1990s. However it is calculated, the global mean not only masks substantial spatial and temporal variation in population trends and sampling effort, but also fails to distinguish between a global decline with global causes and the cumulative effects of local declines with local causes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Yearly least-squares means for ΔNt estimated using the statistical-analysis-system procedure mixed5 for the combined global data and for different regions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alford, R. A. & Richards, S. J. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 133–165 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waldman, B. & Tocher, M. in Behavioural Ecology and Conservation Biology (ed. Caro, T.) 394–443 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).

  3. Wake, D. B. & Morowitz, H. J. Alytes 9, 33–42 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Houlahan, J. E., Findlay, C. S., Schmidt, B. R., Meyer, A. H. & Kuzmin, S. L. Nature 404, 752–755 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W. & Wolfinger, R. D. SAS System for Mixed Models (Cary, North Carolina, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, L. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9031–9036 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., Savage, J. M. & Gorman, G. C. Conserv. Biol. 11, 1307–1322 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B. & Tukey, P. A. Graphical Methods for Data Analysis (Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1983).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross A. Alford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alford, R., Dixon, P. & Pechmann, J. Global amphibian population declines. Nature 412, 499–500 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35087658

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35087658

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing