Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

An automaton for fractal patterns of fragmentation

Abstract

FRACTURES in the Earth's crust have a fractal structure over a wide range of length scales. A micromechanical model has been proposed1 for the formation of fractal patterns of fragmentation in fault zones, based on the preferential fracture, at all length scales, of neighbours of a particle that have the same size as the particle itself. Here we explore this model in two and three dimensions using computer automata which implement these nearest-neighbour fracture rules. The automata produce random fractals which have capacity dimensions between 1.1 and 1.7 in two dimensions, and between 2.0 and 2.8 in three dimensions, the precise value depending on the packing geometry and the presence of long-range interactions imposed by uniform strain conditions. The fractal fragmentation patterns observed in natural systems tend to have dimensions between 2.5 and 2.7; we suggest that our model may permit an interpretation of these values in terms of the packing configuration (number of nearest neighbours) of the constituent particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sammis, C. G., King, G. & Biegel, R. Pure appl. Geophys. 125, 777–812 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barton, C. C. & Hsieh, P. A. Am. geophys. Union Guidebk T385, (1989).

  3. Barton, C. C. in Fractals and their Use in the Earth Sciences (eds Barton, C. C. & LaPointe, P. R.) (GSA Memoir, in the press).

  4. Davy, P., Sornette, A. & Sornette, D. Nature 348, 56–58 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sornette, A., Davy, P. & Sornette, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2266–2269 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bak, P. & Tang, C. J. geophys. Res. 94, 15635–38 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Biegel, R. L., Sammis, C. G. & Dieterich, J. H. J. struct. Geol. 11, 827–846 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman, N. & Schönert, K. Aubereit Tech. 12, 513–518 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, G. L. & Gollub, J. P. Chaotic Dynamics 112–119 (Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steacy, S., Sammis, C. An automaton for fractal patterns of fragmentation. Nature 353, 250–252 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/353250a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/353250a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing