Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Absence of preferred longitude sectors for poles from volcanic records of geomagnetic reversals

Abstract

ACCORDING to a recent compilation of sedimentary records from the past 12 Myr, the reversing geomagnetic field displays a marked long-term longitudinal organization which seems to be correlated with the thermal structure of the lower mantle1. However, the crucial palaeomagnetic observation that intermediate virtual geomagnetic poles are preferentially confined to longitudes over the Americas or antipodal to this sector2,3 might be an artefact caused by distortion and smoothing of the geomagnetic signal by sediments4–6. Here we present a compilation of 400 intermediate poles from 121 volcanic records of excursions and reversals less than 16 Myr old, sampled at various longitudes and latitudes, which does not confirm previous inferences1 and reinforces doubts4–6 about the ability of sediments to properly record a rapidly varying field. In contrast to virtual poles from excursions, those from reversals are uniformly distributed in longitude, which indicates that the reversing field is statistically axisymmetrical. Thus, we conclude that there is no evidence for control of transitional fields by the temperature distribution in the lowermost mantle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laj, C., Mazaud, A., Weeks, R., Fuller, M. & Herrero-Bervera, E. Nature 351, 447 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tric, E. et al. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 65, 319–336 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laj, C., Mazaud, A., Weeks, R., Fuller, M. & Herrero-Bervera E. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2003–2006 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rochette, P. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 98, 33–39 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Hoof, A. A. M. & Langereis, C. G. Nature 351, 223–225 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Langereis, C. G., Van Hoof, A. A. M. & Rochette, P. Nature 358, 226–230 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. McFadden, P. L., Barton, C. E. & Merril, R. T. Nature 361, 342–344 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prévot, M., Mankinen, E. A., Grommé, C. S. & Coe, R. S. Nature 316, 230–234 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanguy, J. C. Geophys. J. Int. 103, 281–283 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coe, R. S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 56, 369–383 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dagley, P. & Lawley, E. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 36, 577–598 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kristjansson, L. & McDougall, I. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 68, 273–294 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Constable, C. Nature 358, 230–233 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman, K. A. Nature 359, 789–794 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valet, J. P., Tucholka, P., Courtillot, V. & Meynadier, L. Nature 356, 400–407 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mankinen, E. A., Prévot, M., Grommé, C. S. & Coe, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 90, 10393–10416 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roperch, P. & Duncan, R. A. J. geophys. Res. 95, 2713–2726 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kristjansson, L. & Sigurgeirsson, M. J. Geomagn. Geoelect. 45, 275–288 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gubbins, D. & Coe, R. S. Nature 362, 51–53 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffman, K. A. Nature 309, 90–91 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mardia, K. V. Statistics of Directional Data (Academic, London, 1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, G. M. J. geophys. Res. 82, 1703–1709 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Prévot, M., Mankinen, E. A., Coe, R. S. & Grammé C. S. J. geophys. Res. 90, 10417–10448 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chauvin, A., Roperch, P. & Duncan, R. A. J. geophys. Res. 95, 2727–2752 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Quidelleur, X., Valet, J. P. & Thouveny, N. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 111, 23–39 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Constable, C. J. geophys. Res. 95, 4587–4596 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kristjansson, L., Johannesson, H., Eriksson, J. & Gudmundsson, A. I. Can. J. Earth Sci. 25, 215–225 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Clement, B. M. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 104, 48–58 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prévot, M., Camps, P. Absence of preferred longitude sectors for poles from volcanic records of geomagnetic reversals. Nature 366, 53–57 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/366053a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/366053a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing