Introduction

Transition metal oxide heterostructures with strongly correlated electrons have demonstrated a host of novel physical phenomena that do not exist in their constituent materials1,2,3, and therefore, they can be considered as a playground for both electronics and spintronics. The quantum correlation resulting from strong electron interactions leads to the interplay of multiple degrees of freedom, such as spin, charge, lattice and orbital. One example of these systems is the heterointerface of LaAlO3 (LAO) and SrTiO3 (STO, ref. 4), where both constituents are nonmagnetic band insulators, but the electronic reconstruction5 at their interface completely changes the physical properties of the entire system. The emergence of unexpected behaviours, such as the creation of a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas4, superconductivity6,7, ferromagnetism8,9,10,11 and the coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism12,13, has been reported and has inspired many intense studies.

Since the first detection of the hysteretic magnetoresistance in the LAO/STO system14 in 2007, much effort has been devoted to investigating the magnetism at this oxide interface. The existence of the ferromagnetic ordering was proved by magnetization and magnetotransport measurements8 and torque magnetometry12. The sparsely distributed ferromagnetic patches were mapped using the scanning superconducting quantum interference device technique9,10. The mechanism of such interface ferromagnetism, nevertheless, remains a controversial issue15,16 and the manipulation of the spin degree of freedom also presents an interesting challenge. Indeed, the LAO/STO heterostructures can be considered a promising framework for spin-tunnelling applications in which the oxide interface performs as a ferromagnet and the LAO layer serves as an insulating barrier.

In this article, we report the fabrication of hybrid magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) wherein an LAO/STO interface is one of the two ferromagnets and the other is the conventional ferromagnetic metal Co. The intervening LAO thin film constitutes a barrier for the spin-polarized tunnelling. The observations of the tunnelling magnetoresistance (TMR) effect in these devices confirm the existence of the ferromagnetism at the LAO/STO interface. Furthermore, the spin transport in the LAO/STO heterostructures shows such a strong anisotropy that the magnitude and sign of the TMR are dramatically modulated by a rotational in-plane magnetic field.

Results

Device growth and characterizations

The LAO/STO heterostructures are prepared using a pulsed laser deposition process, while the Co top electrode with an Au capping layer and the back-gate Au electrode are deposited by sputtering (see Methods). Hall measurement yields carrier density of n=2 × 1013 cm−2 and Hall mobility of μ=103 cm2 V−1 s−1 for the LAO/STO interface at zero gate voltage17. Figure 1a presents a representative high-resolution transmission electron microscopy cross-sectional view of the device along the [001]pc direction, where the subscript ‘pc’ designates the pseudocubic structure of the LAO thin film. The image shows that the thin LAO film is completely strained18,19, and that the interface between the LAO film and STO substrate is atomically flat, abrupt and free from misfit dislocations (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1).

Figure 1: LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface-based magnetic tunnel junctions.
figure 1

(a) Cross-sectional transmission electron microscope micrograph of Co/Ti/LaAlO3/SrTiO3 junctions and the diffractograms of Ti and LaAlO3. (b) Measurement scheme of the devices. The angle-α is the angle between the STO[100] and the in-plane magnetic field. (c) Control of the tunnelling resistance of the fabricated junctions based on the thickness of the Ti interlayer. The forward bias was applied to the top electrodes.

When the magnetic field is applied parallel to the substrate as shown in Fig. 1b, the TMR depends on the parallel and antiparallel alignments of the magnetizations of two ferromagnets. The relative resistance change is given by TMR=(RAPRP)/RP, where RP and RAP designate the tunnelling resistances when the magnetizations are parallel and antiparallel, respectively. It should be emphasized that the epitaxial growth of the thin Ti interlayer between Co and LAO layers is essential for observing clear TMR effects. The insertion of a thin Ti layer reduces the tunnelling resistance by at least three orders of magnitude compared with that for direct contact of Co and LAO layers, as shown in Fig. 1c, which enables an effective spin-polarized tunnelling. Because the nonmagnetic metal layer may reduce the polarization of the spin current from the Co ferromagnet, and thus the TMR ratios, the optimal thickness of the Ti layer is extremely critical. By varying the thickness of the Ti layer, the tunnelling resistance area product to obtain an optimal TMR ratio was revealed to be 1.25–2.50 Ω cm2 with 2.5 nm-thick Ti layer (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2 for more details). The relatively low value of resistance area product is attributed to an effective reduction of the barrier thickness due to an ionic built-in potential in LAO (ref. 20), incorporated with low work function of the metal (Φ=5.0 eV for Co and 4.33 eV for Ti (refs 20, 21)).

Observation of TMR

Typical TMR data acquired at low temperatures are presented in Fig. 2a, where the magnetic field is applied parallel to the crystallographic axis with α=0°. Abrupt switching of the positive TMR occurs at the coercive forces of Co [Hc(Co)40 Oe] and of the ferromagnetic LAO/STO interface [Hc(LAO/STO)600 Oe] with respect to the magnetization alignments of the two ferromagnets. The hysteretic magnetization cycle of the LAO/STO heterostructure sample in Fig. 2c reveals that Hc(LAO/STO) is 600 Oe, which is also similar to that reported by Ariando et al.(see ref. 8, Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3). Our observations of the clear and very sharp switching behaviour of the TMR in the hybrid MTJs, which is the first to demonstrate the hybrid MTJ utilizing the LAO/STO interface to the best of our knowledge, indicates that the interfacial ferromagnetism of the LAO/STO heterostructure occurs on the macroscopic scale. It is noted that the TMR ratio is suppressed at negative voltages and is almost negligible at Vg=−25 V (Fig. 2b). Because the Vg dependence of the TMR ratios is quite similar to that of the tunnelling conductance in the zero-magnetic-field state (Fig. 2d), the vanishing of the TMR at Vg=−25 V can be attributed to a depletion of the charge carriers at the LAO/STO interface. Furthermore, the TMR signals exhibit a slight dependence on the bias current in the measurement range of 50 nA to 1 μA (Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig 4).

Figure 2: Typical TMR data acquired at low temperatures with sample M1.
figure 2

(a) Dependence of the TMR on temperature (measured with a 100 nA bias current). The arrows indicate the sweeping direction of the magnetic field. The colour code is the same throughout the article. (b) The TMR data in response to the gate voltage Vg taken at 2 K. (c) The magnetization cycle of the LAO/STO interface as a function of the in-plane magnetic field. (d) The response of the TMR signals and the conductance (σ) to the back-gate voltage. The conductance is normalized to that at Vg=30 V. The negative back-gate voltage suppresses the carrier density at the LAO/STO interface, causing the removal of the spin-tunnelling signals.

Anisotropy of TMR

It is noticeable that a drastic change of the TMR effect occurs with the variation of the angle between the in-plane magnetic field and the crystallographic axes of the STO substrate, as displayed in Fig. 3a. The magnitude of the TMR, including its sign and coercive force, varies progressively with the angle of the magnetic field. The angle-dependent TMR ratios obtained from two different devices, M1 and M2, reveal twofold rotational symmetric behaviour as observed in Fig. 3b. Note that the TMR signs of the two devices are opposite. This out-of-phase behaviour will be discussed later. Another interesting feature is the angle-dependent coercive force, exhibiting a fourfold symmetric behaviour, as shown in Fig. 3c. The ratio of the maximum to minimum coercive forces reaches 2.8 (1.7) for M1 (M2). This finding indicates that the STO[100] and [010] crystallographic axes correspond to the magnetic easy axis for the interfacial ferromagnetism of the LAO/STO heterostructure, which is the energetically favourable direction for the spontaneous magnetization, while the diagonal STO[110] axis behaves as the hard axis. Thus, the fourfold symmetric coercive force of the LAO/STO interface resembles the pseudocubic symmetry of the STO substrate22,23, while the twofold symmetric TMR signal is caused by the uniaxial anisotropy of the electric conduction at the LAO/STO interface24,25,26.

Figure 3: Anisotropy of the spin-tunnelling phenomena probed in LAO/STO-based tunnel junctions.
figure 3

(a) Evolution of the tunnelling magnetoresistance (TMR) curves of sample M1 with the angle-α at 2 K. (b) The TMR ratios of samples M1 and M2 exhibits a twofold symmetry as a function of the angle-α. The solid curves are guides to the eye. (c) The coercive force (HC) of the LAO/STO interface exhibits a fourfold symmetry.

A strong correlation between the interfacial ferromagnetism and STO structure can also be observed in Fig. 4, which displays various TMR behaviours depending on successive thermal cycling. It is quite striking that the sign of the TMR is reversed from negative to positive (I–II and III–IV stages) or vice versa (II–III), after the sample is heated to a temperature higher than 150 K. The thermal operation below 50 K, however, does not affect the sign and magnitude of the TMR (IV–V). Here, we speculate that the tetragonal domain structure25 of the STO substrate is responsible for the sign reversal of the TMR. Because the STO substrate undergoes a structural phase transition at 105 K, which is driven by a rotation of the oxygen octahedrons about the crystallographic axis27, and the interfacial conductivity of the LAO/STO heterostructures is enhanced along the antiphase domain boundaries separating tetragonal domains in STO25, the thermal cycling above 150 K induces a drastic change in the domain structure resulting in diverse TMR behaviours. The sign difference of the TMR detected in devices M1 and M2 (Fig. 3b) can be explained in a similar manner. Note that the coercive force of the LAO/STO interface is not affected by the thermal cycling.

Figure 4: The TMR sign is randomly selected with thermal cycling above 150 K.
figure 4

(a) Thermal history of sample M3 placed at an angle α=0° with the data acquired at the stages labelled I–V. (b) The TMR is measured at 2 K after thermal cycling from room temperature (I), to 150 K (II), to 220 K (III), to 220 K (IV) and finally to 50 K (V).

Discussions

It has been reported that the sign reversal of the TMR in various MTJs can be caused by modulation of the resonant tunnelling process by the gate voltage28,29, device structure30 and the band structure in tunnel junctions31,32. In particular, the TMR sign reversal was reported in the MTJs with STO and LAO tunnel barrier. A d.c. bias voltage in the range of Volts was applied and the bias dependence reflected the structure of the density of states of the ferromagnetic layers31,32. In our work, instead, the a.c. scheme of bias voltage up to 1 mV allows to measure the spin transport around the Fermi level and the band structure can be considered unchanged within that small range33. In addition, the sign change of the TMR, triggered by the rotation of the magnetic field and the thermal cycling, is unique in our hybrid MTJs and cannot be explained by the anisotropic magnetoresistance observed in the LAO/STO heterointerface under high magnetic fields34,35,36. Moreover, our observation differs from the tunnelling anisotropic magnetoresistance37, which also exhibits angle-dependent sign reversal, in the following aspects: (i) without a Co layer no hysteretic magnetoresistance is observed and (ii) the two resistance jumps match well with the coercive forces of the two constituting ferromagnetic layers.

To explain the sign-switching anisotropic TMR observed in the hybrid junctions of Co and LAO/STO heterostructure, here we propose a possible scenario based on a simplified model38 considering a strong spin-orbit coupling in the LAO/STO heterostructure. Our model is summarized as follows. As a recent experiment25 suggests that the electrical conduction in the LAO/STO interface occurs mainly along the narrow paths at the twin boundaries of the STO substrate, which are elongated along the crystallographic axis. Thus, we regard these conducting paths in the LAO/STO interface as one-dimensional quantum wires (QWs). It was reported that the size of striped tetragonal STO domains is smaller than or comparable to our 500 × 500 μm2 electrodes25,39,40. This indicates that the domains underneath the Co electrodes in some cases have a strongly dominant alignment along one axis while, in other cases, an almost equal distribution along two axes. In this model calculation, the domains underneath the metal electrodes are considered similarly oriented for simplicity. When the direct conduction between the QWs is ignored at the lowest approximation, the hybrid MTJ can be regarded as a two-dimensional junction consisting of a ferromagnetic top electrode (Co), insulating layer (LAO) and one-dimensional QW with both magnetic ordering and Rashba spin-orbit coupling41,42 (Supplementary Fig. 5). The resistance along the QW can be ignored for simplicity, because the magnetoresistance occurs mainly at the tunnel junction between Co and QW. For the conventional MTJs, the positive TMR occurs due to the relative alignment of the spin polarization direction of the two ferromagnetic electrodes, satisfying the Julliere’s model43. However, in our hybrid MTJ model, TMR is determined by the momentum mismatch and the spin overlap across the tunnel junction, which are governed by the quantization of transversal momentum in the QW and the relative angle between the Zeeman and Rashba fields. Numerical calculation38 using typical parameters of the LAO/STO heterostructure15,44,45,46, such as the Fermi energy EF=40 meV, the Rashba spin-splitting energy ΔSO=EF/2, the in-plane Zeeman field ΔZeeman=EF/16, and the thickness of the LAO/STO interface d=1 nm, shows that the sign and magnitude of the TMR vary depending on the angle between the in-plane magnetic field and the Rashba field directions, revealing twofold rotational symmetric cos(α/2) behaviour. This theoretical prediction is quite consistent to our observations of sign switching and twofold anisotropic TMR as shown in Fig. 3b. Furthermore, the out-of-phase TMR data in Fig. 3b obtained from two different samples can be understood by randomly chosen twin boundaries of the respective STO substrates, which are presumed to be elongated along two different perpendicular directions. Thermal-history-dependent sign reversal of the TMR in Fig. 4 also can be explained in a similar manner considering the change of domain structure upon the thermal cycle25. It should be emphasized that our work of the hybrid MTJ made of the LAO/STO interface provides a unique system to study the interplay of the magnetic ordering and Rashba spin-orbit coupling in addition to the interfacial ferromagnetism of the LAO/STO heterostructure.

In summary, we have fabricated hybrid MTJs consisting of Co and LAO/STO heterostructures and observed clear switching of the TMR, which is a clear support for the existence of large-scale interfacial ferromagnetism. The TMR sign is strongly dependent on the in-plane rotation of the magnetic field and thermal cycling. The hybrid MTJ based on the interfacial ferromagnetism provides a new platform to develop metal oxide spintronics devices. Because of the emergence of fascinating properties, the LAO/STO heterostructures can be considered a promising framework for multifunctional device development, in which several degrees of freedom are simultaneously considered. Our achievement of the spin injection and detection schemes for the heterointerfaces opens a new path to investigating the interfacial ferromagnetism and superconductivity.

Methods

Sample preparation

The oxide heterointerfaces were prepared by growing 10 u.c. of LAO on TiO2-terminated STO(001) substrates using pulsed laser deposition at 750 °C with an oxygen pressure of 10−5 torr. The STO substrates were commercial ones with a nominal thickness of 0.5 mm. After growth, the samples were annealed in situ in a high-pressure oxygen environment (500 mtorr) for 30 min; this pressure was maintained during the cooling process. Subsequently, top metal electrodes 500 × 500 μm2 in size, which comprised a few nanometres of Ti and 40 nm of Co, were deposited on the LAO film surface using sputtering deposition with a shadow mask. All the electrodes were capped with 20 nm of Au. Another Au electrode was deposited on the back of the STO substrates for gate tuning measurements. The samples M1, M2 and M3 were identical with a 2.5-nm-thick Ti interlayer. Gold wires were attached to the top electrode with Ag paste and Al wires were attached to the oxide interface by wedge bonding.

Measurements

The current bias technique was used to determine the tunnelling resistance. An a.c. bias voltage was applied to the top electrode while the oxide interface was connected to the ground, ensuring that the current flowed along one of crystallographic axes of the oxide structure. The devices were mounted on a rotatable sample holder that enabled a 360° in-plane rotation of the magnetic field. The direction of the magnetic field was defined by its angle α with respect to the direction along the STO[100] axis. The magnetoresistance measurements were mainly performed at low temperatures with tunnel junctions consisting of a 2.5-nm-thick Ti layer.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ngo, T. D. N. et al. Polarity-tunable magnetic tunnel junctions based on ferromagnetism at oxide heterointerfaces. Nat. Commun. 6:8035 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9035 (2015).