Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Viscoelasticity in carbon nanotube composites

Abstract

Polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes have been extensively researched1,2,3,4 for their strength and stiffness properties. Unless the interface is carefully engineered, poor load transfer between nanotubes (in bundles) and between nanotubes and surrounding polymer chains may result in interfacial slippage1,2 and reduced performance. Interfacial shear, although detrimental to high stiffness and strength, could result in very high mechanical damping, which is an important attribute in many commercial applications. We previously reported5 evidence of damping in nanocomposites by measuring the modal response (at resonance) of cantilevered beams with embedded nanocomposite films. Here we carry out direct shear testing of epoxy thin films containing dense packing of multiwalled carbon nanotube fillers and report strong viscoelastic behaviour with up to 1,400% increase in loss factor (damping ratio) of the baseline epoxy. The great improvement in damping was achieved without sacrificing the mechanical strength and stiffness of the polymer, and with minimal weight penalty. Based on the interfacial shear stress (0.5 MPa) at which the loss modulus increases sharply for our system, we conclude that the damping is related to frictional energy dissipation during interfacial sliding at the large, spatially distributed, nanotube–nanotube interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Test coupons used for damping characterization.
Figure 2: Viscoelastic shear-mode characterization tests.
Figure 3: Complex modulus characterization results.
Figure 4: Effect of shear strain amplitude on damping.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shadler, L. S., Giannaris, S. C. & Ajayan, P. M. Load transfer in carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3842–3844 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajayan, P. M., Shadler L. S., Giannaris C. & Rubio, A. Single-walled carbon nanotube–polymer composites: strength and weakness. Adv. Mater. 12, 750–753 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner, H. D., Lourie, O., Feldman, Y. & Tenne, R. Stress-induced fragmentation of multiwall carbon nanotubes in a polymer matrix. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 188–190 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thostenson, E. T. & Chou, T.-W. Aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced composites: processing and mechanical characterization. J. Phys. D 35, 77–80 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koratkar, N., Wei, B. & Ajayan, P. M. Carbon nanotubes for damping applications. Adv. Mater. 14, 997–1000 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Biggerstaff, J. M. & Kosmatka, J. B. Damping performance of cocured graphite/epoxy composite laminates with embedded damping materials. J. Compos. Mater. 33, 1457–1469 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kosamata, J. B. & Liguore, S. L. Review of methods for analyzing constrained layer damping structures. J. Aerospace Eng. 6, 268–283 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baz, A. & Ro, J. The concept and performance of active constrained layer damping treatments. J. Sound Vibrat. 28, 18–21 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liao, W. H. & Wang, K. W. On the analysis of viscoelastic materials for active constrained layer damping treatments. J. Sound Vibrat. 207, 319–334 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liao, W. H. & Wang, K. W. Characteristics of enhanced active constrained layer damping treatments with edge elements. J. Vibrat. Acoust. 120, 886–893 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y. & Wang, K. W. A non-dimensional parametric study of enhanced active constrained layer damping treatments. J. Sound Vibrat. 223, 611–644 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thostenson, E. T., Zhifeng, R. & Chou, T.-W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 1899–1912 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, F., Cheng, H. M., Bai, S., Su, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Tensile strength of single-walled carbon nanotubes directly measured from their macroscopic ropes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3161–3163 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barber, A., Cohen, S. & Wagner, H. D. Measurement of carbon nanotube–polymer interfacial strength. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4140–4142 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, X., Shin, E., Wang, K. W. & Bakis, C. E. in ASME Intl Design Engineering Technical Conf. (ASME, Chicago, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, X., Wang, K. W. & Bakis, C. E. in SPIE Intl Symp. Smart Structures and Materials: Damping and Isolation Conf. 5386–18 (SPIE, San Diego, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wei, B., Zhang, Z., Ramanath, G. & Ajayan, P. Lift-up growth of patterned aligned carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2985–2987 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei, B. et al. Organized assembly of carbon nanotubes. Nature 416, 495–496 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly, B. T. Physics of Graphite (Applied Science, London, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Painter, P. & Coleman M. Fundamentals of Polymer Science (CRC, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, M. F., Yakobson, B. I. & Ruoff, R. S. Controlled sliding and pullout of nested shells in individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 8764–8767 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cumings, J. & Zettl, A. Low-friction nanoscale linear bearing realized from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Science 289, 602–604 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao, K. & Li, S. Interfacial characteristics of a carbon nanotube–polystyrene composite system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4225–4227 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.K. and P.A. acknowledge funding support from the US National Science Foundation (Faculty Early Career Development Award and NSEC Center for Directed Assembly of Nanostructures Award) and the US Army Research Office through the Structures and Dynamics Program. PK was supported by NSF grant DMR 134725.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikhil Koratkar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suhr, J., Koratkar, N., Keblinski, P. et al. Viscoelasticity in carbon nanotube composites. Nature Mater 4, 134–137 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1293

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1293

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing