Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Microcomputed tomography–based structural analysis of various bone tissue regeneration models

Abstract

Microcomputed tomography (microCT) analysis is a powerful tool for the evaluation of bone tissue because it provides access to the 3D microarchitecture of the bone. It is invaluable for regenerative medicine as it provides the researcher with the opportunity to explore the skeletal system both in vivo and ex vivo. The quantitative assessment of macrostructural characteristics and microstructural features may improve our ability to estimate the quality of newly formed bone. We have developed a unique procedure for analyzing data from microCT scans to evaluate bone structure and repair. This protocol describes the procedures for microCT analysis of three main types of mouse bone regeneration models (ectopic administration of bone-forming mesenchymal stem cells, and administration of cells after both long bone defects and cranial segmental bone defects) that can be easily adapted for a variety of other models. Precise protocols are crucial because the system is extremely user sensitive and results can be easily biased if standardized methods are not applied. The suggested protocol takes 1.5–3.5 h per sample, depending on bone tissue sample size, the type of equipment used, variables of the scanning protocol and the operator's experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ectopic bone formation model.
Figure 2: Segmental defect in a long bone model.
Figure 3: Round critical-size bone defect model.
Figure 4: Setting the lower threshold.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimelman, N., Pelled, G., Gazit, Z. & Gazit, D. Applications of gene therapy and adult stem cells in bone bioengineering. Regen. Med. 1, 549–561 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holdsworth, D.W. & Thornton, M.M. Micro-CT in small animal and specimen imaging. Trends Biotechnol. 20, S34–S39 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Umoh, J.U. et al. In vivo micro-CT analysis of bone remodeling in a rat calvarial defect model. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 2147–2161 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeung, H. et al. Protocols of micro-computed tomographic analysis established for musculoskeletal applications. In A Practical Manual for Musculoskeletal Research (eds. Leung, K., Qin, L. & Cheung, W.) 279–300 (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2008).

  5. Kallai, I. et al. Quantitative, structural, and image-based mechanical analysis of nonunion fracture repaired by genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biomech. 43, 2315–2320 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimelman-Bleich, N. et al. The use of a synthetic oxygen carrier-enriched hydrogel to enhance mesenchymal stem cell-based bone formation in vivo. Biomaterials 30, 4639–4648 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pelled, G. et al. Structural and nanoindentation studies of stem cell-based tissue-engineered bone. J. Biomech. 40, 399–411 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steinhardt, Y. et al. Maxillofacial-derived stem cells regenerate critical mandibular bone defect. Tissue Eng. Part A 14, 1763–1773 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zilberman, Y. et al. Fluorescence molecular tomography enables in vivo visualization and quantification of nonunion fracture repair induced by genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Res. 26, 522–530 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moutsatsos, I.K. et al. Exogenously regulated stem cell-mediated gene therapy for bone regeneration. Mol. Ther. 3, 449–461 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Turgeman, G. et al. Engineered human mesenchymal stem cells: a novel platform for skeletal cell mediated gene therapy. J. Gene Med. 3, 240–251 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tai, K. et al. Nanobiomechanics of repair bone regenerated by genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. Part A 14, 1709–1720 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gafni, Y. et al. Gene therapy platform for bone regeneration using an exogenously regulated, AAV-2-based gene expression system. Mol. Ther. 9, 587–595 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hildebrand, T., Laib, A., Muller, R., Dequeker, J. & Ruegsegger, P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 1167–1174 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bouxsein, M.L. et al. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 1468–1486 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Odgaard, A. & Gundersen, H.J. Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14, 173–182 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the National Institutes of Health grant nos. R01AR056694 and R01DE019902 and from the Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC), U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command No. 08217008 (W.T., Z.G., G.P. and D.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.K. developed the concept, designed the protocol and contributed to writing the manuscript. O.M. provided helpful comments during the development of the protocol and contributed to writing the manuscript. W.T. provided technical support and conceptual advice. G.P. provided helpful comments and contributed to writing the manuscript. Z.G. and D.G. supervised the project. All authors discussed the implications of the protocol and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Gazit.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Method

Detailed IPL Command Lines (PDF 107 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kallai, I., Mizrahi, O., Tawackoli, W. et al. Microcomputed tomography–based structural analysis of various bone tissue regeneration models. Nat Protoc 6, 105–110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.180

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.180

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing