Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is challenging for both surgeon and patient. With the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques, patient morbidity could be reduced. However, these techniques must conform to established principles of open pancreatic surgery with regards to meticulous dissection, haemostasis and oncologic results. The robotic platform is utilized in all facets of surgery, and is being increasingly applied in pancreatic surgery. As with the introduction of any new technology, this approach must undergo rigorous examination before widespread adoption of the technique. In this article, we review the techniques and outcomes of robotic-assisted pancreatic resections, focusing on robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy, robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy and robotic-assisted central pancreatectomy. As the outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery have yet to be rigorously evaluated against the gold standard of open surgery, this Review also highlights major laparoscopic pancreatic series in an effort to summarize the available literature on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.
Key Points
-
The techniques of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery can replicate the outcomes of the open approach
-
Multiple initial reports confirm that robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery is safe
-
Short-term oncologic outcomes seem to be comparable to those of open surgery, but long-term reports are still lacking
-
Detailed assessment of the benefits, costs and scope of implementation of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery need to be carried out
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2050–2059 (2004).
Jayne, D. G. et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 97, 1638–1645 (2010).
Gagner, M. & Pomp, A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg. Endosc. 8, 408–410 (1994).
Gagner, M. & Palermo, M. Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 16, 726–730 (2009).
Gumbs, A. A., Rodriguez Rivera, A. M., Milone, L. & Hoffman, J. P. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 18, 1335–1341 (2011).
Barbash, G. I. & Glied, S. A. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 701–704 (2010).
Zeh, H. J., Bartlett, D. L. & Moser, A. J. Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection. Adv. Surg. 45, 323–340 (2011).
Melvin, W. S., Needleman, B. J., Krause, K. R. & Ellison, E. C. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 13, 33–36 (2003).
Whipple, A. O., Parsons, W. B. & Mullins, C. R. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann. Surg. 102, 763–779 (1935).
Traverso, L. W. & Longmire, W. P. Jr. Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticuoduodenectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 146, 959–962 (1978).
Winter, J. M. et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single institution experience. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 10, 1199–1210 (2006).
Kendrick, M. L. & Cusati, D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch. Surg. 145, 19–23 (2010).
Zureikat, A. H., Nguyen, K. T., Bartlett, D. L., Zeh, H. J. & Moser, A. J. Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction. Arch. Surg. 146, 256–261 (2011).
Zeh, H. J. et al. Outcomes after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary lesions. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 19, 864–870 (2012).
Brennan, M. in Surgery of the Liver and Biliary Tract 3rd edn (eds Blumgart, L. & Fong, Y.) 1073–1089 (Saunders Co Ltd, New York, NY, USA, 2000).
Zhou, N. X. et al. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int. J. Med. Robot. 7, 131–137 (2011).
Narula, V. K., Mikami, D. J. & Melvin, W. S. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 39, 160–164 (2010).
Buchs, N. C. et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J. Surg. 34, 2109–2114 (2010).
Buchs, N. C. et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J. Surg. 35, 2739–2746 (2011).
Giulianotti, P. C., Addeo, P., Buchs, N. C., Ayloo, S. M. & Bianco, F. M. Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40, 1264–1270 (2011).
Giulianotti, P. C. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg. Endosc. 24, 1646–1657 (2010).
Nguyen, K. T. et al. Technical aspects of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD). J. Gastrointest. Surg. 15, 870–875 (2011).
Bassi, C. et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138, 8–13 (2005).
Cuschieri, A., Jakimowicz, J. J. & van Spreeuwel, J. Laparoscopic distal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann. Surg. 223, 280–285 (1996).
Cuschieri, A. Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 39, 178–184 (1994).
Gagner, M., Pomp, A. & Herrera, M. F. Early experience with laparscopic resections of islet cell tumor. Surgery 120, 1051–1054 (1996).
Fernández-Cruz, L. et al. Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 11, 1607–1622 (2007).
Kim, S. C. et al. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg. Endosc. 22, 2261–2268 (2008).
Merchant, N. B., Parikh, A. A. & Kooby, D. A. Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically. Adv. Surg. 43, 283–300 (2009).
Kooby, D. A. et al. A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 210, 779–787 (2010).
Jayaraman, S. et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 211, 503–509 (2010).
Nigri, G. R. et al. Metanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg. Endosc. 25, 1642–1651 (2011).
Borja-Cacho, D., Al-Refai, W. B., Vickers, S. M., Tuttle, T. M. & Jensen, E. H. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 209, 758–765 (2009).
Kooby, D. A. et al. Left sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann. Surg. 248, 438–436 (2008).
Kang, C. M., Kim, D. H. & Lee, W. Ten years of experience with resection of left sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg. Endosc. 24, 1533–1541 (2010).
Daouadi, M. et al. Robot assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann. Surg. (in press).
Kim, D. H., Kang, C. M., Lee, W. J. & Chi, H. S. The first experience of robot assisted spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Korea. Yonsei Med. J. 52, 539–542 (2011).
Kang, C. M., Kim, D. H., Lee, W. J. & Chi, H. S. Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg. Endosc. 25, 2004–2009 (2011).
Waters, J. A. et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148, 814–823 (2010).
Choi, S. H., Kang, C. M., Hwang, H. K., Lee, W. J. & Chi, H. S. Robotic anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 16, 868–869 (2012).
Machado, M. A., Makdissi, F. F., Surjan, R. C. & Abdalla, R. Z. Robotic resection of intraductal neoplasm of the pancreas. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 19, 771–775 (2009).
Ntourakis, D. et al. Robotic left pancreatectomy for pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 18, 642–643 (2011).
Lillemoe, K. et al. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann. Surg. 229, 693–698 (1999).
Speicher, J. E. & Traverso, L. W. Pancreatic exocrine function is preserved after distal pancreatectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 14, 1006–1011 (2010).
Sa Cunha, A., Rault, A., Beau, C., Collet, D. & Moser, A. J. Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: single institution experience of 6 patients. Surgery 142, 405–409 (2007).
Rotellar, F. et al. Totally laparoscopic Roux-en-Y duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after middle pancreatectomy: a consectutive nine-case series at a single institution. Ann. Surg. 247, 938–944 (2008).
Giulianotti, P. C., Sbrana, F., Bianco, F. M., Addeo, P. & Caravaglios, G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 20, 135–139 (2010).
Kang, C. M., Kim, D. H., Lee, W. J. & Chi, H. S. Initial experience using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Surg. Endosc. 25, 1101–1106 (2011).
Giulianotti, P. C., Addeo, P., Buchs, N. C., Bianco, F. M. & Ayloo, S. M. Early experience with robotic total pancreatectomy. Pancreas 40, 311–313 (2011).
Oberholzer, J., Tzvetanov, I., Mele, A. & Beneditti, E. Laparoscopic and robotic donor pancreatectomy for living donor. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 17, 97–100 (2010).
Horgan, S. et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy and nephrectomy for living donor pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplantation 84, 934–936 (2007).
Dulucq, J. L., Wintringer, P. & Mahajna, A. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg. Endosc. 20, 1045–1050 (2006).
Gumbs, A. A. & Gayet, B. The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach. Surg. Endosc. 22, 539–540 (2008).
Palanivelu, C. et al. Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiary center. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 16, 731–740 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J. Winer, H. J. Zeh and A. H. Zureikat contributed equally to all aspects of the article. M. F. Can researched data for the article and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. D. L. Bartlett provided substantial contribution to discussion of the content and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winer, J., Can, M., Bartlett, D. et al. The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9, 468–476 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2012.120
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2012.120
This article is cited by
-
Robotic-assisted organ-preserving or parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy in pancreatic benign or low-grade malignant tumors: a single institute’s experience
Journal of Robotic Surgery (2024)
-
Surgical treatment for pancreatic cystic lesions—implications from the multi-center and prospective German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery (2023)
-
The Learning Curve Study of Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: an Analysis of Outcomes of the First 67 Consecutive Cases at a High-Volume Gastric Center
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (2023)
-
Incisional hernia repair following pancreatic surgery—open vs laparoscopic approach
Hernia (2023)
-
Identifying the preoperative factors predicting the surgical difficulty of robotic distal pancreatectomy
Surgical Endoscopy (2023)