Abstract
As you drive into the centre of town, cars and trucks approach from several directions, and pedestrians swarm into the intersection. The wind blows a newspaper into the gutter and a pigeon does something unexpected on your windshield. This would be a demanding and stressful situation, but you would probably make it to the other side of town without mishap. Why is this situation taxing, and how do you cope?
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tsotsos, J. K. Analyzing vision at the complexity level. Brain Behav. Sci. 13, 423–469 (1990).
James, W. The Principles of Psychology (Henry Holt and Co., New York, 1890).
Lu, Z. -L. & Dosher, B. A. External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Res. 38, 1183–1198 (1998).
Treue, S. & Maunsell, J. H. R. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature 382, 539–541 (1996).
Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).
Goldsmith, M. What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 189–219 (1998).
Chun, M. M. & Potter, M. C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in RSVP. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 109–127 (1995).
Wolfe, J. M. & DiMase, J. S. Do intersections serve as basic features in visual search? Perception 32, 645–656 (2003).
Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).
Neisser, U. Cognitive Psychology (Appleton, Century, Crofts, New York, 1967).
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R. & Franzel, S. L. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 419–433 (1989).
Wolfe, J. M. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1, 202–238 (1994).
DiLollo, V., Kawahara, J., Zuvic, S. M. & Visser, T. A. W. The preattentive emperor has no clothes: a dynamic redressing. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 479–492 (2001).
Nakayama, K. & Joseph, J. S. in The Attentive Brain (ed. Parasuraman, R.) 279–298 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998).
Rensink, R. A. & Enns, J. T. Pre-emption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. Psychol. Rev. 102, 101–130 (1995).
Hochstein, S. & Ahissar, M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36, 791–804 (2002).
Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C. & Eckstein, M. Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Vision Res. 40, 1203–1215 (2000).
Torralba, A. Modeling global scene factors in attention. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 1407–1418 (2003).
Wolfe, J. M. What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychol. Sci. 9, 33–39 (1998).
Haslam, N., Porter, M. & Rothschild, L. Visual search: efficiency continuum or distinct processes? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 742–746 (2001).
Theeuwes, J. & Kooi, J. L. Parallel search for a conjunction of shape and contrast polarity. Vision Res. 34, 3013–3016 (1994).
Julesz, B. & Bergen, J. R. Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perceptions of textures. Bell Sys. Tech. J. 62, 1619–1646 (1983).
Beck, J. Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape. Science 154, 538–540 (1966).
Julesz, B. A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends Neurosci. 7, 41–45 (1984).
Wolfe, J. M. 'Effortless' texture segmentation and 'parallel' visual search are not the same thing. Vision Res. 32, 757–763 (1992).
Treisman, A. & Souther, J. Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of seperable features. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 114, 285–310 (1985).
Treisman, A. & Gormican, S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol. Rev. 95, 15–48 (1988).
Wolfe, J. M. Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 381–389 (2001).
Royden, C. S., Wolfe, J. & Klempen, N. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 436–444 (2001).
Rosenholtz, R. Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Percept. Psychophys. 63, 476–489 (2001).
Treisman, A. M. & Schmidt, H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognit. Psychol. 14, 107–141 (1982).
Treisman, A. & Souther, J. Illusory words: the roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 12, 3–17 (1986).
Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 96, 433–458 (1989).
Verghese, P. Visual search and attention: a signal detection approach. Neuron 31, 523–535 (2001).
Eckstein, M. P. The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychol. Sci. 9, 111–118 (1998).
Palmer, J., Verghese, P. & Pavel, M. The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Res. 40, 1227–1268 (2000).
Nagy, A. L. & Sanchez, R. R. Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1209–1217 (1990).
MacAdam, D. L. Visual sensitivities to color differences in daylight. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 32, 247–274 (1942).
D'Zmura, M. Color in visual search. Vision Res. 31, 951–966 (1991).
Bauer, B., Jolicœur, P. & Cowan, W. B. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly-separable from distractors. Vision Res. 36, 1439–1466 (1996).
Foster, D. H. & Ward, P. A. Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B 243, 75–81 (1991).
Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I. & O'Connell, K. M. The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 34–49 (1992).
Treisman, A. in Handbook of Human Perception and Performance (eds Boff, K. R., Kaufmann, L. & Thomas, J. P.) 35.1–35.70 (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986).
Wolfe, J. M. in Attention (ed. Pashler, H.) 13–74 (Psychology Press Ltd., Hove, East Sussex, UK, 1998).
Chun, M. M. & Wolfe, J. M. in Blackwell's Handbook of Perception (ed. Goldstein, E. B.) 272–310 (Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2001).
Bilsky, A. A. & Wolfe, J. M. Part-whole information is useful in size X size but not in orientation X orientation conjunction searches. Percept. Psychophys. 57, 749–760 (1995).
Chastain, G. & Cheal, M. Attentional capture with various distractor and target types. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 979–990 (2001).
Driver, J., McLeod, P. & Dienes, Z. Are direction and speed coded independently by the visual system? Evidence from visual search. Spat. Vis. 6, 133–147 (1992).
Findlay, J. M. Feature detectors and vernier acuity. Nature 241, 135–137 (1973).
Barenholtz, E., Cohen, E. H., Feldman, J. & Singh, M. Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities. Cognition 89, 1–9 (2003).
Ramachandran, V. S. Perception of shape from shading. Nature 331, 163–165 (1988).
Wolfe, J. M. & Franzel, S. L. Binocularity and visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 81–93 (1988).
Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P. & Green, M. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 56, 495–500 (1994).
Malinowski, P. & Hübner, R. The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: evidence for learned basic features. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 458–463 (2001).
Caerwinski, M., Lightfoot, N. & Shiffrin, R. Automatization and training in visual search. Am. J. Psychol. 105, 271–315 (1992).
Dick, M., Ullman, S. & Sagi, D. Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. Science 237, 400–402 (1987).
McLeod, P., Driver, J. & Crisp, J. Visual search for conjunctions of movement and form is parallel. Nature 332, 154–155 (1988).
Bergen, J. R. & Julesz, B. Rapid discrimination of visual patterns. IEEE Trans Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-13, 857–863 (1983).
Moraglia, G. Display organization and the detection of horizontal lines segments. Percept. Psychophys. 45, 265–272 (1989).
Cavanagh, P., Arguin, M. & Treisman, A. Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 479–492 (1990).
Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N. L. & Shulman, E. P. Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search. Vision Res. 39, 2075–2086 (1999).
Sagi, D. The combination of spatial frequency and orientation is effortlessly perceived. Percept. Psychophys. 43, 601–603 (1988).
Moraglia, G. Visual search: spatial frequency and orientation. Percept. Mot. Skills 69, 675–689 (1989).
Theeuwes, J. Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not. Percept. Psychophys. 57, 637–644 (1995).
Yantis, S. & Jonides, J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 121–134 (1990).
Gilchrist, I. D., Humphreys, G. W. & Riddoch, M. J. Grouping and extinction: evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 13, 1223–1249 (1996).
Fahle, M. Parallel perception of vernier offests, curvature, and chevrons in humans. Vision Res. 31, 2149–2184 (1991).
Nakayama, K. & Silverman, G. H. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 320, 264–265 (1986).
O'Toole, A. J. & Walker, C. L. On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: evidence from visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 59, 202–218 (1997).
He, Z. J. & Nakayama, K. Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature 359, 231–233 (1992).
Enns, J. T., Rensink, R. A. & Douglas, R. The influence of line relations on visual search. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (Suppl.) 31(4), 105 (1990).
Enns, J. T. & Rensink, R. A. in Visual Search 2 (eds Brogan, D., Gale, A. & Carr, K.) 73–89 (Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1993).
Sun, J. & Perona, P. Preattentive perception of elementary three dimensional shapes. Vision Res. 36, 2515–2529 (1996).
Tsal, Y., Meiran, N. & Lamy, D. Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. Vis. Cognit. 2, 313–330 (1995).
Wolfe, J. M. & Bennett, S. C. Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Res. 37, 25–43 (1997).
Kristjansson, A. & Tse, P. U. Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 390–403 (2001).
Chen, L. Toplogical structure in visual perception. Science 218, 699–700 (1982).
Chen, L. Holes and wholes: a reply to Rubin and Kanwisher. Percept. Psychophys. 47, 47–53 (1990).
Cheal, M. & Lyon, D. Attention in visual search: multiple search classes. Percept. Psychophys. 52, 113–138 (1992).
Pomerantz, J. R. & Pristach, E. A. Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 635–649 (1989).
Taylor, S. & Badcock, D. Processing feature density in preattentive perception. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 551–562 (1988).
Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G. W. & Riddoch, M. J. Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17, 561–570 (1991).
Elder, J. & Zucker, S. A measure of closure. Vision Res. 34, 3361–3369 (1994).
Kovacs, I. & Julesz, B. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7495–7497 (1993).
Williams, D. & Julesz, B. Perceptual asymmetry in texture perception. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6531–6534 (1992).
Chen, L. The topological approach to perceptual organization. Vis. Cognit. (in the press).
Rubin, J. M. & Kanwisher, N. Topological perception: holes in an experiment. Percept. Psychophys. 37, 179–180 (1985).
Wolfe, J. M., Yee, A. & Friedman-Hill, S. R. Curvature is a basic feature for visual search. Perception 21, 465–480 (1992).
Kleffner, D. A. & Ramachandran, V. S. On the perception of shape from shading. Percept. Psychophys. 52, 18–36 (1992).
Takeuchi, T. Visual search of expansion and contraction. Vision Res. 37, 2083–2090 (1997).
Braddick, O. J. & Holliday, I. E. Serial search for targets defined by divergence or deformation of optic flow. Perception 20, 345–354 (1991).
Frith, U. A curious effect with reversed letters explained by a theory of schema. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 113–116 (1974).
Kinchla, R. A. & Collyer, C. E. Detecting a target letter in briefly presented arrays: a confidence rating analysis in terms of a weighted additive effects model. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 117–122 (1974).
Shiffrin, R. M. & Gardner, G. T. Visual processing capacity and attentional control. J. Exp. Psychol. 93, 72–82 (1972).
Grice, G. R. & Canham, L. Redundancy phenomena are affected by response requirments. Percept. Psychophys. 48, 209–213 (1990).
Brand, J. Classification without identification in visual search. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 23, 178–186 (1971).
Jonides, J. & Gleitman, H. A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or digit. Percept. Psychophys. 12, 457–460 (1972).
Duncan, J. Category effects in visual search: a failure to replicate the 'oh–zero' phenomenon. Percept. Psychophys. 34, 221–232 (1983).
Krueger, L. E. The category effect in visual search depends on physical rather than conceptual differences. Percept. Psychophys. 35, 558–564 (1984).
Brown, J. M., Weisstein, N. & May, J. G. Visual search for simple volumetric shapes. Percept. Psychophys. 51, 40–48 (1992).
Pilon, D. & Friedman, A. Grouping and detecting vertices in 2-D, 3-D, and quasi-3-D objects. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 52, 114–127 (1998).
Nothdurft, H. C. Faces and facial expression do not pop-out. Perception 22, 1287–1298 (1993).
Suzuki, S. & Cavanagh, P. Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: an object inferiority effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 901–913 (1995).
Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L. & Skov, R. B. It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception 25, 1091–1108 (1996).
Hansen, C. H. & Hansen, R. D. Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 917–924 (1988).
von Grunau, M. & Anston, C. The detection of gaze direction: a stare-in-the-crowd effect. Perception 24, 1297–1313 (1995).
Tong, F. & Nakayama, K. Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 1016–1035 (1999).
Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D. & Merikle, P. M. Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1004–1013 (2001).
Bundesen, C., Kyllingsbaek, S., Houmann, K. J. & Jensen, R. M. Is visual attention automatically attracted by one's own name? Percept. Psychophys. 59, 714–720 (1997).
Tipples, J., Young, A., Quinlan, P., Broks, P. & Ellis, A. Searching for threat. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 55, 1007–1026 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolfe, J., Horowitz, T. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nat Rev Neurosci 5, 495–501 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411
This article is cited by
-
Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation
Argumentation (2024)
-
Framing the fallibility of Computer-Aided Detection aids cancer detection
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2023)
-
Influence of stimulus manipulation on conscious awareness of emotional facial expressions in the match-to-sample paradigm
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Assessing the allocation of attention during visual search using digit-tracking, a calibration-free alternative to eye tracking
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Color me calm: Grayscale phone setting reduces anxiety and problematic smartphone use
Current Psychology (2023)