Abstract
Both in clinical practice and medical research, blood pressure is still largely measured by auscultation using a mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood pressure is the most important predictor of life expectancy. Treatment of high blood pressure reduces strokes, heart attack and heart failure. Accurate measurement is therefore essential. At a large London teaching hospital, just under 500 mercury sphygmomanometers and their associated cuffs were examined. More than half had serious problems that would have rendered them inaccurate in measuring blood pressure. At the same time, assessment of the technical knowledge needed to measure blood pressure by the ausculatory technique was also carried out amongst medical and nursing staff. This showed a considerable level of ignorance. These results inevitably lead to inaccurate measurement of blood pressure with serious consequences. In addition mercury is a non-degradable pollutant, eventually accumulating on the sea bed. The use of mercury in sphygmomanometers is already in the process of being eliminated in Scandinavia and Holland and other countries are likely to follow. Our results suggest that mercury sphygmomanometers are not adequately maintained and require expertise that is not available for accurate measurement of blood pressure. Their use should be dispensed with on these grounds before a ban for other and, perhaps less justifiable reasons. Validated automatic devices, which are less liable to measurement and observer error should be used instead. At the same time a concerted effort is needed to instruct health care professionals on the importance of more accurate measurement of blood pressure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markandu, N., Whitcher, F., Arnold, A. et al. The mercury sphygmomanometer should be abandoned before it is proscribed. J Hum Hypertens 14, 31–36 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000932
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000932
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
20 years on – the measurement of blood pressure and detection of hypertension in children and adolescents: a national descriptive survey
Journal of Human Hypertension (2023)
-
Brazilian health professionals’ perceptions and knowledge about automated blood pressure monitors
Journal of Human Hypertension (2022)
-
The mercury sphygmomanometer: soon a museum piece!
Journal of Human Hypertension (2021)
-
Blood pressure differences between a mercury sphygmomanometer and two automatic devices
Biomedical Engineering Letters (2015)
-
Assessing Blood Pressure Accuracy of an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer in a National Survey Environment
American Journal of Hypertension (2011)