Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Assessment of cardiovascular reactivity by fractal and recurrence quantification analysis of heart rate and pulse transit time

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 17, pages 111–118 (2003)Cite this article

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 22 July 2003

Abstract

Methods used for the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity are flawed by nonlinear dynamics of the cardiovascular responses to stimuli. In an attempt to address this issue, we utilized a short postural challenge, recorded beat-to-beat heart rate (HR) and pulse transit time (PTT), assessed the data by fractal and recurrence quantification analysis, and processed the obtained variables by multivariate statistics. A 10-min supine phase of the head-up tilt test was followed by recording 600 cardiac cycles on tilt, that is, 5–10 min. Three groups of patients were studied, each including 20 subjects matched for age and gender— healthy subjects, patients with essential hypertension (HT), and patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The latter group was studied on account of the well-known dysautonomia of CFS patients, which served as contrast against the cardiovascular reactivity of the healthy population. A total of 52 variables of the HR and PTT were determined in each subject. The multivariate model identified the best predictors for the assessment of reactivity of healthy subjects vs CFS. Based on these predictors, the ‘Fractal & Recurrence Analysis-based Score’ (FRAS) was calculated: FRAS=76.2+0.04*HR-supine-DET −12.9*HR-tilt-R/L −0.31*HR-tilt-s.d. −19.27*PTT-tilt-R/L −9.42*PTT-tilt-WAVE. The median values and IQR of FRAS in the groups were: healthy=−1.85 (IQR 1.89), hypertensives=+0.52 (IQR 5.78), and CFS=−24.2 (5.34) (HT vs healthy subjects: P=0.0036; HT vs CFS: P<0.0001). Since the FRAS differed significantly between the three groups, it appears likely that the FRAS may recognize phenotypes of cardiovascular reactivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenman RH . Does anxiety or cardiovascular reactivity have a causal role in hypertension? Integr Physiol Behav Sci 1991; 26: 296–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasagi F, Akahoshi M, Shimaoka K . Relation between cold pressor test and development of hypertension based on 28-year follow-up. Hypertension 1995; 25: 71–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lundbrook J, Mancia G, Ferrari A, Zanchetti A . The variable neck chamber method for studying the cardiac baroreflex in man. Clin Sci Mol Med 1977; 53: 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parati G, DiRienzo M, Omboni S, Mancia G . Computer analysis of blood pressure and heart rate variability in subjects with normal and abnormal autonomic cardiovascular control. In: Matias CJ, Bannister R (eds). Autonomic Failure. A Textbook of Clinical Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System, 4th edn. Oxford Univervity Press: Oxford, 1999: pp 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kingwell BA et al. Comparison of heart rate spectral analysis with cardiac noradrenaline spillover and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in human subjects. In: Rienzo MD, Mancia G, Parati G, Pedotti A, Zanchetti A (eds). Computer Analysis of Cardiovascular Signals, IOS Press: Amsterdam, 1995, pp 167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iyengar N et al. Age-related alterations of the fractal scaling of cardiac interbeat interval dynamics. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: R1078–R1084.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naschitz JE et al. The hemodynamic instability score (HIS) for assessment of cardiovascular reactivity in hypertensive and normotensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 177–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eckman JP, Kamphorts SO, Ruelle R . Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhys Lett 1987; 4: 973–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manetti C et al. Recurrence quantification analysis in molecular dynamics. Ann New York Acad Sci 1999; 879: 258–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gastaldelli A et al. Linear and nonlinear properties of heart rate variability: influence of obesity. Ann New York Acad Sci 1999; 879: 249–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Joint National Committee: . Report of the Sixth Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 153: 2413–2446.

  12. Fukuda K et al. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 953–959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Naschitz JE et al. The 10 min supine −30 min tilt test for the diagnosis of hypertension. Comparison with 24 h ambulatory blood pressure. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 366–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith RP, Argod J, Pepin J-L, Levy PA . Pulse transit time: an appraisal of potential clinical applications. Thorax 1999; 54: 452–457 (Review).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Naschitz JE et al. Fractal analysis and recurrence quantification analysis of heart rate and pulse transit time for diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Autonomic Res 2002; 12: 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasegawa M et al. Increased pulse wave velocity and shortened pulse wave transmission time in hypertension and aging. Cardiology 1997; 88: 147–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollack MH, Orbist PA . Aortic-radial pulse transit and ECG Q-wave to radial pulse wave interval as indices of beat-to-beat blood pressure change. Psychophysiology 1983; 20: 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Asmar RG et al. Converting enzyme inhibition: dissociation between antihypertensive and arterial effects. J Hum Hypertens 1992; 6: 381–385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rehman A, Rahman AR, Rasool AH, Naing NN . The effects of angiotensin II on pulse wave velocity in healthy humans. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 39: 423–430.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Braunwald E, Sonnenblick EH, Ross J . Mechanisms of cardiac contraction and relaxation. In: Braunwald E (ed). Heart Disease. A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 4th edn. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, 1992, p 364.

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Divitiis M et al. Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: impact of early surgery. Circulation 2001; 104 (Suppl 1): I165–I170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gokce N et al. Effects of race and hypertension on flow-mediated and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation of the brachial artery. Hypertension 2001; 38: 1: 1349–1354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitch RM, Vergona R, Sullivan ME, Wang YX . Nitric oxide synthase inhibition increases aortic stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity in rats. Cardiovasc Res 2001; 51: 351–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kingwell BA et al. Arterial compliance may influence baroreflex function in athletes and hypertensives. Am J Physiol 1995; 268 (1 Part 2): H411–H418.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Editorial. Fractals in medicine. Lancet 1991; 338: 1425–1425.

  26. Iyengar N et al. Age-related alterations of the fractal scaling of cardiac interbeat interval dynamics. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: 1078–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan D, Glass L . Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Naschitz JE et al. Hemodynamic instability in chronic fatigue syndrome: indices and diagnostic significance. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 31: 199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Naschitz JE et al. Cardiovascular response to upright tilt in fibromyalgia differs from that in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 1356–1360.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Naschitz JE et al. Hemodynamic instability score in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and non-CFS chronic fatigue. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 2002, in press.

  31. Yataco A et al. Comparison of heart rate variability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and controls. Clin Auton Res 1997; 7: 293–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pagani M, Liciani D . Chronic fatigue syndrome: a hypothesis focusing on the autonomic nervous system. Clin Sci (Colch) 1999; 96: 117–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. LaManca JJ et al. Cardiovascular response during head-up tilt in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Physiol 1999; 19: 111–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine A, Bnai-Zion Medical Center and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    J E Naschitz, N Shaviv, I Khorshidi, S Sundick, H Isseroff, M Fields, R M Priselac, D Yeshurun & E Sabo

  2. Rheumatology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    R Itzhak

Authors
  1. J E Naschitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Itzhak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Shaviv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I Khorshidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S Sundick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H Isseroff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M Fields
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R M Priselac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. D Yeshurun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. E Sabo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J E Naschitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naschitz, J., Itzhak, R., Shaviv, N. et al. Assessment of cardiovascular reactivity by fractal and recurrence quantification analysis of heart rate and pulse transit time. J Hum Hypertens 17, 111–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001517

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001517

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links