Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:12:24.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Cary Coglianese  and
David Lazer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze a little-studied regulatory approach that we call management-based regulation. Management-based regulation directs regulated organizations to engage in a planning process that aims toward the achievement of public goals, offering firms flexibility in how they achieve public goals. In this article, we develop a framework for assessing conditions for using management-based regulation as opposed to the more traditional technology-based or performance-based regulation. Drawing on case studies of management-based regulation in the areas of food safety, industrial safety, and environmental protection, we show how management-based regulation can be an effective strategy when regulated entities are heterogeneous and regulatory outputs are relatively difficult to monitor. In addition to analyzing conditions for the use of management-based regulation, we assess the range of choices regulators confront in designing management-based regulations. We conclude that management-based regulation requires a far more complex intertwining of the public and private sectors than is typical of other forms of regulation, owing to regulators’ need to intervene at multiple stages of the production process as well as to the degree of ambiguity over what constitutes “good management.”

Type
Of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 691 - 730
Copyright
© 2003 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Ash Fund for Research on Democratic Governance at the Kennedy School, as well as helpful comments received on earlier versions of this article from participants in meetings of the Law and Society Association, the Association of Public Policy and Management, the Visions of Governance in the Twenty-First Century Project, and the Kennedy School's faculty research seminar. We would especially like to thank Jack Donahue, Neil Gunningham, Robert Hahn, Jay Hamilton, Bridget Hutter, Paul Kleindorfer, Howard Kunreuther, Ted Marmor, Jennifer Nash, Todd Olmstead, Eric Orts, Peter Schmeidler, Jeff Smoller, Peter Strauss, Ulku Oktem, David Weil, and the anonymous reviewers from this journal for their thoughtful and constructive feedback on earlier versions of this article.

References

References

Ackerman, Bruce, & Stewart, Richard (1985) “Reforming Environmental Law,” 37 Stanford Law Rev. 1333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian, & Braithwaite, John (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene, & Kagan, Robert (1982) Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1968) “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” 76 J. of Political Economy 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Monica, & Gieser, Ken (1997) Evaluating Progress: A Report on the Findings of the Massachusetts Toxic Use Reduction Program Evaluation. Lowell, MA: Toxic Use Reduction Institute.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (1982) “Enforced Self Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control,” 80 Michigan Law Rev. 1466–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, Stephen (1982) Regulation and Its Reform. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) “Preliminary FoodNet Data on the Incidence of Foodborne Illnesses—Selected Sites, United States, 2001,” 51 Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report 325–29.Google Scholar
Chinander, Karen R., Kleindorfer, Paul R., & Kunreuther, Howard C. (1998) “Compliance Strategies and Regulatory Effectiveness of Performance-Based Regulation of Chemical Accident Risks,” 18 Risk Analysis 135–44. pmid/9637074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coase, Ronald (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost,” 3 J. of Law and Economics 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, Cary (2001) “Policies to Promote Systematic Environmental Management,” in Coglianese, C. & Nash, J., eds., Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
(2002) “Empirical Analysis and Administrative Law,” 2002 Univ. of Illinois Law Rev. 1111–37.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, & Nash, Jennifer (2001) “Environmental Management Systems and the New Policy Agenda,” in Coglianese, C. & Nash, J., eds., Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary, Nash, Jennifer, & Olmstead, Todd (2002) “Performance-Based Regulation: Prospects and Limitations in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation,” John F. Kennedy School of Government Working Paper No. RWP02-050.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2001) Ten Years of Toxics Use Reduction. Boston: Department of Environmental Protection.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard, & March, James (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gall, Ken (2000) “Seafood Technology: National Seafood Industry HACCP Implementation Survey Report,” National Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education, April.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (2001) “Federal Oversight of Seafood Does Not Sufficiently Protect Consumers,” Report to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate (GAO-01-204).Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (2002) “Meat and Poultry: Better USDA Oversight and Enforcement of Safety Rules Needed to Reduce Risk of Foodborne Illnesses,” Report to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate (GAO-02-902).Google Scholar
Graham, Mary (2002) Democracy by Disclosure: The Rise of Technopopulism. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil (1996) “From Compliance to Best Practice in OHS: The Role of Specification, Performance, and Systems-Based Standards,” 9 Australian J. of Labor Law 221–46.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, & Grabosky, Peter (1998) Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, & Johnstone, Richard (1999) Regulating Workplace Safety: Systems and Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, & Rees, Joseph (1997) “Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective,” 19 Law & Policy 363–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. Richard (1990) Groups that Work (And Those That Don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. (1989) A Primer on Environmental Policy Design. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. (1996) Risks, Costs, and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation. Washington, DC: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W., & Hester, Gordon L. (1989) “Marketable Permits: Lessons for Theory and Practice,” 16 Ecology Law Q. 361–406.Google Scholar
Hutter, Bridget (2001) Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, William (1997) “Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Plans Under the Clean Air Act Section 112(r),” 3 Environmental Lawyer 515.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, Gunningham, Neil, & Thornton, Dorothy (2002) “Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter? 37 Law & Society Rev. 51–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karkkainen, Bradley (2001) “Information as Environmental Regulation: TRI, Performance Benchmarking, Precursors to a New Paradigm? 89 Georgetown Law J. 257–370.Google Scholar
Kleindorfer, Paul (1999) “Understanding Individuals’ Environmental Decisions: A Decision Science Approach,” in Sexton, K., Marcus, A. A., William, E. K., & Burkhardt, T. B., eds., Better Environmental Decisions: Strategies for Government, Businesses and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Kleindorfer, Paul, & Orts, Eric (1998) “Informational Regulation of Environmental Risks,” 18 Risk Analysis 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komesar, Neil (1994) Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics, and Public Policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, Howard, McNulty, Patrick J., & Kang, Yong (2002) “Third Party Inspection as an Alternative to Command and Control Regulation,” 22 Risk Analysis 309–18. pmid/12022678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassiter, Sharlene W. (1997) “From Hoof to Hamburger: The Fiction of a Safe Meat Supply,” 33 Willamette Law Rev. 411–65.Google Scholar
Lazer, David (2001) “Regulatory Interdependence and International Governance,” 8 J. of European Public Policy 474–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, David G. (1997) Large Property Damage Losses in the Hydrocarbon-Chemical Industries: A Thirty-Year Review, 17th ed. New York: Marsh & McLennan Protection Consultants.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (2002) “Toxics Use Reduction Planning Guidance,” http://www.state.ma.us/dep/bwp/dhm/tura/files/turplg02.doc.Google Scholar
McNamara, Stephen H. (1997) “A Legal Assessment of FDA's New HACCP Regulations,” 52 Food Drug Law J. 39–47. pmid/10346708Google ScholarPubMed
Mead, Paul S., Slutsker, Laurence, Dietz, Vance, McCaig, Linda F., Bresee, Joseph S., Shapiro, Craig, Griffin, Patricia M., & Tauxe, Robert V. (1999) “Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States,” 5 Emerging Infectious Diseases 607–25. pmid/10511517Google ScholarPubMed
National Academy of Sciences (1985) An Evaluation of the Role of Microbiological Criteria for Foods and Food Ingredients. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1998) Ensuring Safe Food: From Production to Consumption. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1990) “Proposed Rule for Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals,” 55 Federal Register 29150.Google Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1992) “Final Rule for Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals,” 57 Federal Register 6356.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (1995) Environmental Policy Tools: A User's Guide, OTA-ENV-634. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Orts, Eric (1995) “Reflexive Environmental Law,” 89 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 1227–90.Google Scholar
Palmer, Karen, Oates, Wallace E., & Portney, Paul R. (1995) “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?,” 9 J. of Economic Perspectives 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parson, Edward, Zeckhauser, Richard, & Coglianese, Cary (2003) “Collective Silence and Individual Voice: The Logic of Information Games,” in Heckelman, J. & Coates, D., eds., Collective Choice: Essays in Honor of Mancur Olson. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., & Sunstein, Cass R. (1995) “Reinventing the Regulatory State,” 62 Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 1–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A. Mitchell, & Shavell, Steven (1984) “The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment,” 24 J. Public Economics 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, John, & Zeckhauser, Richard (1985) “Principals and Agents: An Overview,” in Pratt, J. & Zeckhauser, R., eds., Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Rakoff, Todd D. (2000) “The Choice Between Formal and Informal Modes of Administrative Regulation,” 52 Administrative Law Rev. 159–74.Google Scholar
Rees, Joseph V. (1988) Reforming the Workplace: A Study of Self-Regulation in Occupational Safety. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Forest L. (2000) Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Kenneth (2000) “Framing Environmental Policy Instrument Choice,” 10 Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 221–85.Google Scholar
Shavell, Steven (1984) “Liability for Harm Versus Regulation of Safety,” 13 J. of Legal Studies 357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, Robert N. (1989) “Harnessing Market Forces to Protect the Environment,” 31 Environment 28–35.Google Scholar
(2002) “Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments,” in Mäler, K.-G. & Vincent, J., eds., Handbook of Environmental Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard (2001) “A New Generation of Environmental Regulation?,” 29 Capital Univ. Law Rev. 21–182.Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. (1992) “The Rulemaking Continuum,” 41 Duke Law J. 1463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1999) “Informational Regulation and Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond,” 147 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 613–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Michael R. (1997) “Preparing America's Food Safety System for the Twenty-First Century,” 52 Food and Drug Law J. 13–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Tietenberg, Thomas (1990) “Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation,” 6 Oxford Rev. of Economic Policy 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1995) “Proposed Rule on Pathogen Reduction and HACCP Systems,” 60 Federal Register 6774.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1996) “Final Rule on Pathogen Reduction and HACCP Systems,” 61 Federal Register 38806.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2001) “Proposed Performance Standards for the Production of Processed Meat and Poultry Products,” 66 Federal Register 12590.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2002) Progress Report on Salmonella Testing of Raw Meat and Poultry Products, 1998-2001. Washington, DC: Food Safety and Inspection Service.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996) “Risk Management Programs Under Clean Air Act Section 112(r)(7),” 61 Federal Register 31668–31730.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Latest Findings on National Air Quality: 1999 Status and Trends, EPA-454/F-00-002. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2001) Third Party Audit Pilot Project in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1995) “HACCP Procedures for Seafood Processing,” 60 Federal Register 65095–65202.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2001a) “HACCP Procedures for Juice Processing,” 66 Federal Register 6137–6202.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2001b) Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards and Controls Guidance, 3d ed. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/haccp4.html.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (1983) Risk by Choice: Regulating Health and Safety in the Workplace. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip, Vernon, John M., & Harrington, Joseph E. Jr. (2000) Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver (1981) “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,” 87 American J. of Sociology 548–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases, Statutes, and Regulations Cited

American Federation of Government Employees v. Veneman, 284 F.3d 125 (2002)Google Scholar
Canadian Fish Inspection Regulations, 802 C.R.C. §§ 14(1) & 15(6) (2003)Google Scholar
Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions—Operating Procedures, 40 C.F.R. § 68.52 (2002)Google Scholar
Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions—Training, 40 C.F.R. § 68.54 (2002)Google Scholar
Clean Air Act Amendments, Pub. L. 101-549, Title III, § 304, 104 Stat. 2576 (November 15, 1990)Google Scholar
Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-97 (2000)Google Scholar
Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1907, 21 U.S.C. §§ 601-95 (2000)Google Scholar
General Plan Requirements, 310 C.M.R. § 50.42(11) (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HACCP Training, 21 C.F.R. § 123.10 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inadequate HACCP Systems, 9 C.F.R. § 417.6 (2003)Google Scholar
Poultry Products Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. § 451 (2000)Google Scholar
Supreme Beef Processors v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 275 F.3d 432 (5th Circuit, 2001)Google Scholar
Toxic Use Reduction Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 21I (1994 & Supp., 2000)Google Scholar