Skip to main content
Log in

Improving in-training evaluation programs

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL, Sachs LS. Nurses as evaluators of the humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents. J Med Educ. 1987;62:842–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dauphinée WD. Assessing clinical performance: where do we stand and what might we expect? JAMA. 1995;274(9):741–3. Editorial.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nash DB, Markson LE, Howell S, Hildreth EA. Evaluating the competence of physicians in practice: from peer review to performance assessment. Acad Med. 1993;68(2):S19–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hull AL, Hodder S, Berger B, et al. Validity of three clinical performance assessments of internal medicine clerks. Acad Med. 1995;70(6):517–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jansen JJM, Tan LHC, van der Vleuten CPM, van Luijk SJ, Rethans JJ, Grol RPTM. Assessment of competence in technical clinical skills of general practitioners. Med Educ. 1995;29:247–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kane MT. The assessment of professional competence. Evaluating Health Professionals. 1992;15:163–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Littlefield JH, DaRosa DA, Anderson KD, Bell RM, Nicholas GG, Wolfson PJ. Assessing performance in clerkships: accuracy of surgery clerkship performance raters. Acad Med. 1991;66(9):S16–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller GR. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:S63–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Phelan S. Evaluation of the non-cognitive professional traits of medical students. Acad Med. 1993;68(10):799–803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray JD. Primer on resident evaluation. Ann R Coll Phys Surg. 1996;29(2):91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parenti CM, Harris I. Faculty evaluation of student performance: a step towards improving the process. Med Teacher. 1992;14(2/3):185–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnick R, Taylor B, Maudsley R, et al. In-training evaluation—it’s more than just a form! Ann R Coll Phys Surg Can. 1991;24:415–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butterfield PS, Mazzaferri EL. New rating form for use by nurses in assessing residents humanistic behavior. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan CB, Centor RM. The use of nurses to evaluate house officers’ humanistic behavior. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:410–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Henkin Y, Friedman M, Bouskila D, Kushnir D, Glick S. The use of patients as student evaluators. Med Teacher. 1990;12(3/4):279–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tamblyn R, Benaroya S, Snell L, McLeod P, Schnarch B, Abrahamowicz M. The feasibility and value of using patient satisfaction ratings to evaluate internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:146–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weaver MJ, Ow C, Walker DJ, Degenhardt EF. A questionnaire for patients’ evaluations of their physicians’ humanistic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:135–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramsay PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer rating to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993;269(13):1655–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon MJ. Cutting the Gordian knot: a two part approach to the evaluation and professional development of residents. Acad Med. 1997;72:876–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gray JD. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad Med. 1996;71(1 suppl):S55–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill DA, Guinea AI, McCarthy WH. Formative assessment: a student perspective. Med Educ. 1994;28:394–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunt DD. Functional and dysfunctional characteristics of the prevailing model of clinical evaluation systems in North American medical schools. Acad Med. 1992;67(4):254–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Newble DI. Assessing clinical competence at the undergraduate level. Med Educ. 1992;26:504–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, de Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Med Educ. 1991;25:119–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van der Vleuten CPM, Norman GR, de Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ. 1991;25:110–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maxim BR, Dielman TE. Dimensionality, internal consistency and inter rater reliability of clinical performance ratings. Med Educ. 1987;27:130–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Phillips SE. Legal issues in performance assessment. West’s Educ Law Q. 1993;2(2):329–58.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stillman PL. Positive effects of a clinical performance assessment program. Acad Med. 1991;66(8):481–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rolfe IE, Andren JM, Pearson S, Hensley MS, Gordon JJ. Clinical competence of interns. Med Educ. 1995;29:225–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Neufeld V, Maudsley R, Pickering R, et al. Demand-side medical education: educating future physicians for Ontario. Can Med Assoc J. 1993;148:1471–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCrae HM, Vu NV, Graham B, Word-Sims M, Colliver JA. Robbs RS. Comparing checklists and databases with physicians ratings as measures of students’ history and physical-examination skills. Acad Med. 1995;70(4):313–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Haber RJ, Avins AL. Do ratings on the American Board of Internal Medicine resident evaluation form detect differences in clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:140–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith RM. The triple-jump examination of an assessment tool in the problem-based medical curriculum at the University of Hawaii. Acad Med. 1993;68(5):366–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McGuire C. Perspectives in assessment. Acad Med. 1993;68(2):S3–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McLeod PJ. Assessing the value of student case write-ups and write-up evaluations. Acad Med. 1989;64:273–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

As part of the In-Training project, this work was supported by the Educating Future Physicians of Ontario (EFPO) project and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turnbull, J., Gray, J. & MacFadyen, J. Improving in-training evaluation programs. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 317–323 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00097.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00097.x

Keywords

Navigation