Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Parameter estimation of an induction machine using advanced particle swarm optimisation algorithms

Parameter estimation of an induction machine using advanced particle swarm optimisation algorithms

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Electric Power Applications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes a new application of two advanced particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithms for parameter estimation of an induction machine (IM). The inertia weight, cognitive and social parameters and two independent random sequences are the main parameters of the standard PSO algorithm which affect the search characteristics, convergence capability and solution quality in a particular application. Two advanced PSO algorithms, known as the dynamic particle swarm optimisation (dynamic PSO) and chaos PSO algorithms modify those parameters to improve the performance of the standard PSO algorithm. The algorithms use the measurements of the three-phase stator currents, voltages and the speed of the IM as the inputs to the parameter estimator. The experimental results obtained compare the estimated parameters with the IM parameters achieved using traditional tests such as the dc, no-load and locked-rotor tests. There is also a comparison of the solution quality between a genetic algorithm (GA), standard PSO, dynamic PSO and chaos PSO algorithms. The results show that the dynamic PSO and chaos PSO algorithms are better than the standard PSO algorithm and GA for parameter estimation of the IM.

References

    1. 1)
      • A. Ratnaweera , S.K. Halgamuge , H.C. Watson . Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. , 240 - 255
    2. 2)
      • Sag, T., Cunkas, M.: `Multiobjective genetic estimation to induction motor parameters', Proc. Int. Aegean Conf. Elect. Mach. and Power Electron., ACEMP ’07 & Electromotion ’07, 10–12 September 2007, Bodrum, Turkey, p. 628–631.
    3. 3)
      • K.S. Huang , Q.H. Wu . Effective identification of induction motor parameters based on fewer measurements. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. , 55 - 60
    4. 4)
      • Arumugam, M.S., Chandramohan, A., Rao, M.V.C.: `Competitive approaches to PSO algorithms via new acceleration co-efficient variant with mutation operators', Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Computational Intelligent and Multimedia Application, ICCIMA ’05, 16–18 August 2005, p. 225–230.
    5. 5)
      • Meng, H.J., Zheng, P., Wu, R.Y., Hao, X.J., Xie, Z.: `A hybrid particle swarm algorithm with embedded chaotic search', Proc. 2004 IEEE Conf. Cybernate and Intelligent System, 1–3 December 2004, Singapore, p. 367–371.
    6. 6)
      • Feng, Y., Yao, Y.M., Wang, A.X.: `Comparing with chaotic inertia weights in particle swarm optimization', Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 19–22 August 2007, Hong Kong, p. 329–333.
    7. 7)
      • Picardi, C., Rogano, N.: `Parameter identification of induction motor based on particle swarm optimization', Int. Symp. Power Electronic, Electrical Drives, Automation, and Motion, SPEEDAM 2006, 2006, p. 32–37.
    8. 8)
      • Feng, Y., Teng, G.F., Wang, A.X., Yao, Y.M.: `Chaotic inertia weight in particle swarm optimization', Second Int. Conf. Innovative Computing, Information and Control, ICICIC ’07, 5–7 September 2007, p. 475–478.
    9. 9)
      • Karimi, A., Choudhry, M.A., Feliachi, A.: `PSO-based evolutionary optimization for parameter identification of an induction motor', 39thNorth American Power Symp., NAPS 2007, 2007, p. 659–664.
    10. 10)
      • Bishop, R.R., Richards, G.G.: `Identifying induction machine parameters using a genetic optimization algorithm', Proc. IEEE, Southeastcon ’90, 1990, p. 476–479.
    11. 11)
      • B. Alatas , E. Akin , A.B. Ozer . Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms. J. Chaos, Solitons Fractals , 4 , 1715 - 1734
    12. 12)
      • Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.: `A modified particle swarm optimizer', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Evolution Computation, 4–9 May 1998, Piscataway, New Jersey, p. 69–73.
    13. 13)
      • Guangyi, C., Wei, G., Kaisheng, H.: `On line parameter identification of an induction motor using improved particle swarm optimization', Proc. 26th Chinese Control Conf., CCC 2007, July 2007, Zhangjiajie, Hunan, China, p. 745–749.
    14. 14)
      • Bergh, F.V.D.: `An analysis of particle swarm optimizers', 2001, PhD, Pretoria University, South Africa.
    15. 15)
      • S. Ayasun , C.O. Nwankpa . Induction motor tests using MATLAB/Simulink and their integration into undergraduate electric machinery courses. IEEE Trans. Educ. , 37 - 46
    16. 16)
      • Proco, A.B., Keyhani, A.: `Induction motor parameter identification from operating data electric drive applications', Proc. 18th Digital Avionics System Conf., 1999, 24–29 October 1999, p. 1–6.
    17. 17)
      • B. Liu , L. Wang , Y.H. Jin , F. Tang , D.X. Huang . Improved particle swarm optimization combined with chaos. J. Chaos, Solitons Fractals , 5 , 1261 - 1271
    18. 18)
      • B.K. Bose . (2002) AC machines for drives, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives.
    19. 19)
      • R.K. Ursem , P. Vadstrup . Parameter identification of induction motors using stochastic optimization algorithms. J. Appl. Soft Comput. , 1 , 49 - 64
    20. 20)
      • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: `Particle swarm optimization', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 1995, p. 1942–1948.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-epa.2009.0296
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-epa.2009.0296
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address