Assessing error recognition in automated driving
Assessing error recognition in automated driving
- Author(s): W. Spiessl and H. Hussmann
- DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2010.0102
For access to this article, please select a purchase option:
Buy article PDF
Buy Knowledge Pack
IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library
Thank you
Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.
- Author(s): W. Spiessl 1 and H. Hussmann 2
-
-
View affiliations
-
Affiliations:
1: Human-Machine Interaction, BMW Group, Research and Technology, München, Germany
2: Institute for Media Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
-
Affiliations:
1: Human-Machine Interaction, BMW Group, Research and Technology, München, Germany
- Source:
Volume 5, Issue 2,
June 2011,
p.
103 – 111
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2010.0102 , Print ISSN 1751-956X, Online ISSN 1751-9578
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Published
Technical progress in automated driving research is about to alter the way of driving from manual control towards supervision of automated control. Even if there is still a long way to go, it is worth exploring the ramifications an automated driving task implies. A shift of attention towards secondary activities in the car is acceptable as long as the automation is guaranteed not to fail. An interesting question appears when automation fails only in rare cases. In this study, the authors are exploring drivers’ ability of error recognition in an automated driving scenario with a focus on simultaneously performing secondary tasks. The authors use a newly developed method for this, the autonomous lane change test. The authors find clear effects of secondary tasks on automation supervision, with tasks requiring strong engagement to be most noticeable.
Inspec keywords: transportation
Other keywords:
Subjects: Transportation; Transportation system control
References
-
-
1)
- E.L. Wiener , R.E. Curry . Flight deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics , 10 , 995 - 1011
-
2)
- C.D. Wickens , J.G. Hollands , C.D. Wickens , J.G. Hollands . (2000) Signal detection, information theory and absolute judgment, Engineering psychology and human performance.
-
3)
- Spiessl, W., Mangold, M.: `ALCT – a methodical approach toward evaluating the influence of secondary tasks during automated driving', Proc. European Conf. Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 2010, Berlin, Germany, p. 379–388.
-
4)
- R. Parasuraman , V. Riley . Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors , 2 , 230 - 253
-
5)
- L. Bainbridge . Ironies of automation. Automatica , 775 - 779
-
6)
- ISO 26022:2010: ‘Road vehicles – ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems –simulated lane change test to assess in-vehicle secondary task demand’, 2010.
-
7)
- Buld, S., Krüger, H.-P., Hoffmann, S., Kaussner, A., Tietze, H., Totzke, I.: `Wirkungen von Assistenz und Automation auf Fahrerzustand und Fahrsicherheit', Final Project Report EMPHASIS: Effort-Management und Performance-Handling in sicherheitsrelevanten Situationen, 2002.
-
8)
- W.R. Boot , A.F. Kramer , E. Becic , D.A. Wiegmann , T. Kubose . Detecting transient changes in dynamic displays: the more you look, the less you see. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. , 4 , 759 - 773
-
9)
- C. Spence , C. Ho , C. Castro . (2009) Crossmodal information processing in driving, Human factors of visual and cognitive performance in driving.
-
10)
- (2006) Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems.
-
11)
- M.R. Endsley , E.O. Kiris . The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors , 2 , 381 - 394
-
12)
- S. Mattes , A. Hallén , M.A. Regan , J.D. Lee , K.L. Young . (2009) Surrogate distraction measurement techniques: the lane change test, Driver distraction: theory, effects and mitigation.
-
13)
- D. de Waard , M. van der Hulst , M. Hoedemaeker , K. Brookhuis . Driver behaviour in an emergency situation in the automated highway system. Transp. Hum. Factors , 1 , 67 - 82
-
14)
- J.D. Lee , T.F. Sanquist , R. Parasuraman , M. Mouloua . (1996) Maritime automation, Automation and human performance.
-
15)
- Flemisch, F., Kelsch, J., Löper, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J., Heesen, M.: `Cooperative control and active interfaces for vehicle assistance and automation', Proc. FISITA Automotive World Congress, Munich, F2008-02-045, VDI-FVT, 2008.
-
16)
- P.A. Hancock , W.B. Verwey . Fatigue, workload and adaptive driver systems. Accident Anal. Prev. , 4 , 495 - 506
-
17)
- S.G. Hart , L.E. Staveland , P.A. Hancock , N. Meshkati . (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, Human mental workload.
-
18)
- M.S. Young , N.A. Stanton . Attention and automation: new perspectives on mental underload and performance. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. , 2 , 178 - 194
-
19)
- A. Pauzié , G. Pachiaudi , T. Rothengatter , E. Carbonell Vaya . (1997) Subjective evaluation of the mental workload in the driving context, Traffic & transport psychology: theory and application.
-
20)
- L.R. Young , D. Sheena . Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. , 5 , 397 - 429
-
21)
- T.B. Sheridan . (2002) Humans and automation: system design and research issues.
-
22)
- J.D. Lee , K.A. See . Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors , 50 - 80
-
23)
- E. Hollnagel . Looking for errors of omission and commission or the hunting of the snark revisited. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. , 135 - 145
-
24)
- C.D. Wickens . (1992) Attention, time-sharing, and workload, Engineering psychology and human performance.
-
25)
- Harbluk, J.L., Mitroi, J.S., Burns, P.C.: `Three navigation systems with three tasks: using the lane-change test (LCT) to assess distraction demand', Proc. Fifth Int. Driving Symp. Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, June 2009, Big Sky, MT, USA, p. 24–30.
-
26)
- C.D. Wickens , Y. Liu . Codes and modalities in multiple resources: a success and a qualification. Hum. Factors , 5 , 599 - 616
-
27)
- S. Mattes , H. Strasser , H. Bubb . (2003) The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation, Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future.
-
28)
- D.L. Strayer , W.A. Johnston . Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychol. Sci. , 462 - 466
-
1)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2010.0102
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2010.0102
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
