Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring perceived brand luxury: An evaluation of the BLI scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the psychometric properties of Vigneron and Johnson's Brand Luxury Index scale. The authors developed the scale using data collected from a student sample in Australia. To validate the scale, the study reported in this paper uses data collected from Taiwanese luxury consumers. The scale was initially subjected to reliability analysis yielding low α values for two of its five proposed dimensions. Exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses were subsequently performed to examine the dimensionality of brand luxury. Discriminant and convergent validity tests highlight the need for further research into the dimensionality of the construct. Although the scale represents a good initial contribution to understanding brand luxury, in view of consumers' emerging shopping patterns, further investigation is warranted to establish the psychometric properties of the scale and its equivalence across cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Note

  • Chadha, R. and Husband, P. (2006) The Cult of the Luxury Brand: Inside Asia's Love Affair with Luxury. London: Nicholas Brealy International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2007) Luxury market growth seen at 8% next 3yrs study, 17 October. Available from http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL1775672020071017, accessed 6 November 2007.

  • BCG. (2004) Trading Up: Update On Trends, Brands, and Practices – 2004 Research Update, Report.

  • Vigneron, F. and Johnson, L. W. (2004) Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management 11 (6): 484–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, R. W., Madden, C. S. and Dunn, M. G. (2000) Conducting marketing science: The role of replication in the research process. Journal of Business Research 48: 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. and Armstrong, J. S. (1994) Replication and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary. International Journal of Research in Marketing 11: 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocak, A., Abimbola, T. and Ozer, A. (2007) Consumer brand equity in a cross-cultural replication: An evaluation of a scale. Journal of Marketing Management 23 (1): 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E. (2001) The desperate need for replications. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987) The college sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the record straight. The Academy of Management Review 12 (1): 157–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, L. R. and Pearcy, D. (2001) Four subtle sins in scale development: Some suggestions for strengthening the current paradigm. International Journal of Market Research 43 (4): 409–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G. and Zeller, R. A. (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage: Beverly Hills, California.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1986) Psychological testing, 5th edn., Macmillan: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, B., Czellar, S. and Laurent, G. (2005) Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury: Empirical evidence from twenty countries. Marketing Letters 16 (2): 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (1998) Perceiving luxury and necessity. Journal of Economic Psychology 19 (5): 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alleres, D. (1990) Luxe…. Strategies Marketing. Economica: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. S. and Renand, F. (2003) The marketing of luxury goods: An exploratory study. The Marketing Review 3: 459–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nueno, J. L. and Quelch, J. A. (1998) The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, November–December, pp. 61–68.

  • Dubois, B., Laurent, G. and Czellar, S. (2001) Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes. Working paper 736, HEC School of Management, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

  • Dubois, B. and Paternault, C. (1995) Understanding the world of international luxury brands: The dream formula. Journal of Advertising Research 35 (4): 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigneron, F. and Johnson, L. W. (1999) A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review 3 (1): 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (1984) Conspicuous consumption: A literature review. European Journal of Marketing 18 (3): 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. (1991) Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing 8 (1): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O. and Hunter, G. L. (2001) Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfein, R. T. (1989) Cross-cultural perspectives on the dynamics of prestige. Journal of Services Marketing 3 (Summer): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B. (1982) Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing 46 (Summer): 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2000) Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 37 (February): 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. J. (1994) The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988) Possessions and extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair et al, 1998 state that for a sample size >350 factor loadings of 0.30 are statistically significant.

  • Wells, W. D. (1993) Discovery-oriented consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (4): 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. L. and Sonner, B. S. (2001) Just say no to traditional student samples. Journal of Advertising Research 41 (5): 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J. J. and Dunne, P. M. (1986) An appraisal of the use of student subjects in marketing research. Journal of Business Research 14 (4): 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1986) College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn., Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (Spring): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V. and Garolera, J. (2001) Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (3): 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1986) Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J. and Maheswaran, D. (1997) The effect of cultural orientation of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (3): 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. and Markus, H. R. (1999) Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 785–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R. and Nisbett, R. E. (1998) The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., McGraw-Hill: San Francisco, pp. 915–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. Y. and Ahuvia, A. C. (1998) Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology & Marketing 15 (5): 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://www.geert-hofstede.com, accessed 4 September 2008.

  • Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences. Sage: Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984) The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review 9 (3): 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Christodoulides.

Additional information

3was a postgraduate student at the University of Birmingham in 2006–2007. She now works in Marketing for the Qisda Corporation in Taiwan.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

See Table A1.

Table a1 The brand luxury index

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christodoulides, G., Michaelidou, N. & Li, C. Measuring perceived brand luxury: An evaluation of the BLI scale. J Brand Manag 16, 395–405 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.49

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.49

Keywords

Navigation