Abstract
This article highlights some of the problems pertaining to the relationship between globalization and labour in Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Indonesia. The experience of workers and organized labour during the Asian Crisis is used to gauge the position of workers and their organizations in relation to the state and other social forces in this ‘era’ of globalization. Thus, much attention is paid to the domestic power structures which organized labour confronts. It is contended that the position of organized labour in all four Southeast Asian countries considered had been uniformly less than strong prior to the crisis, and this greatly influenced the degree to which labour organizations had the capacity to affect state policy during the debacle of 1997–98. However, the relative position of organized labour in each country was not exactly the same and, it is argued, the capacity of labour to respond to the crisis was an indicator of its standing in relation to the wider constellation of state and society forces. The analysis is informed by the theoretical position that policy-making is not a matter of arriving objectively and neutrally at ‘rational’ decisions, but involves contests between competing interests, and is therefore affected by the nature of the distribution and use of power in society.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is a significantly revised version of a paper originally presented at a Conference on Globalization and Labour, 5 and 6 September 2000, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. The conference was organized by the Jabatan Sains Politik UKM and the Malaysian Trade Union Congress.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadiz, V. Globalization, Labour, and Economic Crisis: Insights from Southeast Asia. Asian Bus Manage 1, 249–266 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200015
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200015