Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating Wal-Mart's Impacts in Maryland: A Test of Identification Strategies and Endogeneity Tests

  • Article
  • Published:
Eastern Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I estimate the impact of Wal-Mart on labor markets in Maryland. My goal is to compare estimation techniques that incorporate corrections for endogeneity of Wal-Mart's entrance and those that test for and fail to reject exogeneity in Wal-Mart's entrance decision. The instrumental variable approaches I test include those offered by Basker and Neumark et al., and a new test introduced in this paper. I also explain why differences in choice of sample time and location may lead to different findings as to the impact of Wal-Mart. I find that there is weak evidence of endogeneity in Wal-Mart's entrance decision, but that the bias is opposite of that anticipated by most researchers. Most interestingly, there are no significant differences across instrumental variable techniques employed in the literature. As for Wal-Mart in Maryland, that exposure to Wal-Mart leads to lower retail employment (from zero to 414 retail jobs), but significantly higher retail wages (as much as $1.95 per hour) at the county level. I also find that exposure to Wal-Mart has no effect on aggregate labor markets, though aggregate wages are positively affected, although the impact is very small (roughly $160 per year). I recommend that Maryland adopt a policy neutral approach to Wal-Mart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For non-econometric studies see Artz [1999], Artz and McConnon [2001], Barnes and Connell [1996], Franz and Robb [1989], Hornbeck [1994], Ketchum and Hughes [1997], McGee and Gresham [1995], Stone [1988, 1995, 1997], and Stone et al. [1992].

  2. The real estate research literature describes this as demand externalities. See Eppli and Benjamin [1994]. This is also highly consistent with the findings of Hicks and Wilburn [2001] and Basker [2005a, 2005b].

  3. Basker painstakingly reproduced data on Wal-Mart from commercial maps that suffered unanticipated errors; these errors were not identified until Neumark, Zhang, and Cicarella (NZC) [2005]. Dube and Jacobs [2005] employed NZC's instrument on Basker's data and found similar results to those of NZC. Hicks [2005, 2007a] employed an instrument similar to Basker's on Ohio counties and found similar (though not directly comparable) results to Basker. Hicks’ paper could be viewed as suffering the same identification critique as those leveled at Basker by, among others, Neumark et al. [2005].

  4. Generalizability of these results to large regions may also not be possible given the heterogeneity in local fiscal structure as noted by Wassmer [2002].

  5. In a December 6, 2005, radio broadcast on WUNC, the North Carolina Public Broadcasting show, ‘The State of Things,’ Glen Wilkins, community affairs manager for the southeast region of Wal-Mart, identified market size as a location choice consideration. Graff [1998] suggests that location decisions for Supercenters are expressly linked to mid-sized towns in less densely populated areas proximal to other Wal-Mart stores (where the firm is already known).

  6. The November 4, 2005 conference, hosted by Global Insight, was memorable for the opportunity several of the paper presenters had to explain endogeneity to the national media representatives.

  7. Several discussions with local developers over the past few years lad me to believe that two important facets of Wal-Mart entrance bear into the choice of instrumentation. First, Wal-Mart is not choosing locations, but rather choosing developers to choose locations. There are many different developers, even within the same geographic regions. Second, the intra-county location choices seem to matter more to the developers than the inter-county choices.

  8. These results are available from the author.

  9. Interestingly, this corresponds to my observations when first speaking publicly about my Wal-Mart at a Richmond FRB conference in rural West Virginia, I was told that a new Wal-Mart hired workers in town by offering Kmart workers $1 more an hour in the parking lot during shift change. This range is somewhat larger than my estimates of new hire wages in selected Pennsylvania counties 2001–2004 [see Hicks 2007b].

  10. The rather high adjusted goodness of fit in these models is most likely due to the very high intertemporal correlation captured by the autoregressive component.

  11. Many studies, particularly those provided to local governments, estimate local fiscal effects of a new Wal-Mart (or other similar retail outlet) focusing on a very small region. These studies are designed to answer very specific questions and so any criticism of them should be viewed within this light.

References

  • Artz, G.M . 1999. The Impact of Wal-Mart on Retail Market Structure in Maine, Thesis, University of Maine, Orono, Maine.

  • Artz, G.M., and J.C. McConnon . 2001. The Impact of Wal-Mart on Host Towns and Surrounding Communities in Maine, Mimeo: 1–26.

  • Barnes, N.G., and A. Connell . 1996. Regional Differences in the Economic Impact of Wal-Mart. Business Horizons, 39 (4): 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basker, Emek . 2005a. Job Creation or Destruction? Labor Market Effects of Wal-Mart Expansion. Review of Economics and Statistics February, 87 (1): 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basker, Emek . 2005b. Selling a Cheaper Mousetrap: Wal-Mart's Effect on Retail Prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 52 (13): 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curs, Bradley, Mark State, and Michael Visser . 2004. How Much Will Sam Pay For Land? The Locations of Big-Box Retailers and Local Land Values, Mimeo.

  • Dube, Arindrajit, and Ken Jacobs . 2004. Hidden Cost of Wal-Mart Jobs Use of Safety Net Programs by Wal-Mart Workers in California, Berkeley: Center for Labor Research and Education, Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California.

  • Dube, Arindrajit, Barry Eidlin, and Bill Lester . 2005. Impact of Wal-Mart Growth on Earnings Throughout the Retail Sector in Urban and Rural Counties. Berkely: Institute of Industrial Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppli, Mark J., and John D. Benjamin . 1994. The Evolution of Shopping Center Research. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 9 (1): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Andrew W . 2001. The Impact of Wal-Mart Supercenters on Supermakret Concentration in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Agribusiness, 17 (1): 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, L., and E. Robb . 1989. Effect of Wal-Mart Stores on the Economic Environment of Rural Communities, Mimeo, University of Missouri.

  • Global, Insight . 2005. The Economic Impact of Wal-Mart, pp. 1–62.

  • Goetz, Stephan J., and Hema Swaminathan . 2004. Wal-Mart and County-Wide Poverty. Social Sciences Quarterly, 87 (2): 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, Thomas O . 1998. The Locations of Wal-Mart and Kmart Supercenters: Contrasting Corporate Strategy. Professional Geographer, 50 (1): 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Michael J., and Kristy Wilburn . 2001. The Regional Impact of Wal-Mart Entrance: A Panel Study of the Retail Trade Sector in West Virginia. Review of Regional Studies, 31 (3): 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Michael J., and Kristy Wilburn . 2005. Does Wal-Mart Cause an Increase in Anti-Poverty Program Expenditures?, mimeo.

  • Hicks, Michael J., and Kristy Wilburn . 2007a. Wal-Mart's Impact on Local Revenue and Expenditure Instruments in Ohio, 1988–2003. Atlantic Economic Journal, 35 (1): 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Michael J., and Kristy Wilburn . 2007b. Job Turnover and Wages in the Retail Sector: The Influence of Wal-Mart. Journal of Private Enterprise, XXIII (3): 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J., and E. Leibtag . 2005. Consumer Benefits from Increased Competition in Shopping Outlets: Measuring the Effect of Wal-Mart’, MIT mimeo, revised May 2005.

  • Hornbeck, J.F . 1994. The Discount Retail Industry and Its Effect on Small Towns and Rural Communities, CRS Report for Congress, The Library of Congress, January 18, 1994.

  • Keil, Stanley R., and Lee C. Spector . 2007. The Impact of Wal-Mart on Employment Andwage Differentials in Alabama. Review of Regional Studies, 35: 336–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum, B.A., and J.W. Hughes . 1997. Wal-Mart and Maine: The Effect on Employment and Wages, mimeo, University of Maine.

  • McGee, Jeffrey E., and George G. Gresham . 1995. When Wal-mart comes to town: a look at how local merchants respond to the retailing giant's arrival. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 8 (1): 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, David, Junfu Zhang, and Stephen Ciccarella . 2005. The Effects of Wal-Mart on Local Labor Markets, mimeo.

  • Reynolds, Alan . 2005. Should Wal-Mart Raise Prices. Wall Street Journal, November 10.

  • Sobel, Russell S., and Andrea Dean . 2005. Has Wal-Mart Buried Mom & Pop?: The Impact of Wal-Mart on Self Employment and Small Establishments in the United States, Entrepreneurship Center, West Virginia University.

  • Stone, K.E . 1988. The Effects of Wal-Mart Stores on Businesses in Host Towns and Surrounding Towns in Iowa, Unpublished paper, Iowa State University, Ames.

  • Stone, K.E . 1995. Competing With the Retail Giants. New York: John Wiley and Sons, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, K.E . 1997. Impact of the Wal-Mart Phenomenon on Rural Communities. Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies.

  • Stone, K.E ., S.C. Deller, and J.C. McConnon, Jr. . 1992. The New Retail Environment in Maine, The Maine Business Research Report 3: 1 September, 1992.

  • Villareal, Pam . 2005. Thinking Outside the “Big Box”. Brief Analysis no. 501, National Center for Policy Analysis, February 21, 2005.

  • Waddoup, C.Jeffrey . 2004. Health Care Subsidies in Construction: Does the Public Sector Subsidize Low Wage Contractors, in The Economics of Prevailing Wage Laws, edited by Hamid Azari-Rad and Mark J. Prus Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Halbert . 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48 (4): 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, Robert W . 2002. Fiscalization of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries, and Non-Central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States. Urban Studies, 39 (July): 1307–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank three anonymous referees and the editor of this journal. I also thank Wal-Mart for making these data available. Any errors are, of course, my own. I also want to make clear that I have no financial relationship with Wal-Mart other than as an occasional consumer (primarily of diapers).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table A1, Table A2

Table a1 Coefficient values in models with time-state dummy (Coefficients for Wal-Mart exposure only, t-statistics in parentheses)
Table a2 Coefficient values in retail employment urban/rural models (Coefficients for Wal-Mart exposure only, t-statistics in parentheses)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hicks, M. Estimating Wal-Mart's Impacts in Maryland: A Test of Identification Strategies and Endogeneity Tests. Eastern Econ J 34, 56–73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050002

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation