Skip to main content
Log in

Insider ownership, human resource strategies and performance in a transition economy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers and potential investors in transition economies need to understand the Human Resource Management (HRM) strategies of target firms, since human resources are arguably their most valuable assets. Understanding is difficult, however, because HRM strategies help to determine firms' performance, but are in turn influenced by corporate governance, particularly insider ownership. This paper employs a structural equation modeling methodology to examine the relations between governance, HRM strategies and performance in the context of a novel dataset of Ukrainian industrial firms. It is found that insider ownership is positively associated with high-commitment HRM strategies and negatively with low-commitment, cost-cutting HRM strategies. Cost-cutting HRM strategies are in turn associated with weaker firm performance. These outcomes correspond broadly with theoretical expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There was a total of 1,093 joint stock enterprises (JSE) in the full sample. We compared the distribution of the full JSE sample and the reduced sample used in the analysis, using the sample variables as in the previous analysis and found close similarities in the distributions. These data are available from the authors on request.

  2. GFI and AGFI values above 0.9 represent a reasonably good fit. RMSEA below the level of 0.05 is considered to be a good fit.

References

  • Anderson, J., Lee, Y. and Murrell, P. (2000) ‘Competition and privatization amidst weak institutions: evidence from Mongolia’, Economic Inquiry 38(4): 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J.B. (1994) ‘Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover’, Academy of Management Journal 37(3): 670–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J. and Lawler, J.J. (2000) ‘Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: impact on firm performance in an emerging economy’, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.P. and Carroll, G.R. (1995) ‘Modeling internal organizational change’, American Review of Sociology 21: 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.P., Greve, H. and Park, D. (1994) ‘An evolutionary model of organizational performance’, Strategic Management Journal 15(1): 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J.N., Burton, M.D. and Hannan, M.T. (1996) ‘The road taken: origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies’, Industrial and Corporate Change 5(2): 239–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J.N., Hannan, M.T. and Burton, D.M. (1999) ‘Building the iron cage: determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations’, American Sociological Review 64(4): 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1956) Work and Authority in Industry – Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization, John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. and Zhu, Y. (1999) ‘Markets, firms and markets: the transformation of HRM in Chinese SOEs’, Human Resource Management Journal 9(4): 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, D.D. (1995) ‘Problems with repeated measure analysis: demonstration with a study of the diversification and performance relationship’, Academy of Management Journal 38(6): 1692–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I. and Xiucheng, F. (2002) ‘Human resource management and the performance of Western firms in China’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 13(6): 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, J.R. and Kruse, D. (1992) The New Owners., New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branine, M. (2001) ‘International HRM: Americanization or Japanization?’, in M.D. Hughes and J.H. Taggart (eds.) International Business: The European Dimension, Palgrave: London, pp: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Wright, M. and Zhukov, V. (1999) ‘Corporate governance and employee ownership in an economic crisis: enterprise strategies in the former Soviet Union’, Journal of Comparative Economics 27(3): 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camia, N. and Hollinshead, G. (2003) ‘Assessing the potential for effective cross-cultural working between ‘new’ Russian managers and Western expatriates’, Journal of World Business, in press.

  • Child, J. and Czegledy, A.P. (1996) ‘Managerial learning in the transformation of Eastern Europe: some key issues’, Organization Studies 17(2): 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix, J. and Swaminathan, A. (1991) ‘Cosmetic, speculative and adaptive change in the wine industry: a longitudinal study’, Administrative Science Quarterly 36(4): 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J.T. and Huselid, M.A. (1996) ‘The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance’, Academy of Management Journal 39(4): 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S. (1999) ‘Ownership structure and enterprise restructuring in six newly independent states’, Comparative Economic Studies 41(1): 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S. and Murrell, P. (2002) ‘Enterprise restructuring in transition: a quantitative survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 40(3): 739–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, L.V. and Sequeira, C.G. (1993) ‘Determinants of LDC exporters' performance: a cross-national study’, Journal of International Business Studies 24(1): 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R.P. (1992) ‘Japan's version of managerial capitalism’, in T.A. Kochan and M. Useem (eds.) Transforming Organizations, Oxford University Press: New York, pp: 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, J.S. and Estrin, S. (1996) ‘Employee ownership in transition’, in R. Frydman, C.W. Gray and A. Rapaczynski (eds.) Corporate governance in Russia: Vol 2, Insiders and the State, World Bank/CEU Press: London, pp: 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRD (2001) Transition Report, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development: London.

  • Elenkov, D.S. (1998) ‘Can American management concepts work in Russia: a cross-cultural comparative study’, California Management Review 40(4): 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and Rosevear, A. (1999) ‘Enterprise performance and corporate governance in Ukraine’, Journal of Comparative Economics 27(3): 442–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. and Wright, M. (1999) ‘Corporate governance in the former Soviet Union: an overview’, Journal of Comparative Economics 27(3): 398–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. and Rodrik, D. (1991) ‘Resistance to reform: status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty’, American Economic Review 81(5): 1146–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fey, C.F. and Björkman, I. (2001) ‘The effect of human resource management practices on MNE subsidiary performance in Russia’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(1): 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, C.F., Björkman, I. and Pavlovskaya, A. (2000) ‘The effect of human resource management practices in firm performance in Russia’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Buck, T. and Zhukov, V. (2000) ‘Downsizing in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus’, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Dyomina, N., Wright, M. and Buck, T. (2001) ‘Effects of post-privatization governance and strategies on export intensity in the Former Soviet Union’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(4): 853–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I. and Toms, S. (2003) ‘Corporate governance, strategy and survival in a declining industry: a study of UK cotton textile companies’, Journal of Management Studies 40(4): 895–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Wright, M. and Bleaney, M. (1999) ‘Privatization, insider control and managerial entrenchment in Russia’, Economics of Transition 7(2): 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friebel, G. and Guriev, S. (2000) ‘Should I stay or Should I go? Worker attachment in Russia. Working paper w0002, Center for Economic and Financial Research: Moscow.

  • Frydman, R., Gray, C., Hessel, M. and Rapaczynski, A. (1999) ‘When does privatization work? The impact of private ownership on corporate performance in the transition economies’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4): 1153–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P.N., Nordhaug, O. and Ringdal, K. (1999) ‘Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: human resource management in European firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly 44(3): 507–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. (1999) ‘Human resource management: the workers' verdict’, Human Resource Management Journal 9(3): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., Burton, M.D. and Baron, J.N. (1996) ‘Inertia and change in the early years: employment relations in young, high technology firms’, Industrial and Corporate Change 5(2): 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J.H. (1984) ‘Structural inertia and organizational change’, American Sociological Review 49: 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H.A. (1992) ‘Between a rock and a hard place: organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 37(1): 48–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Johnson, R.A. and Moesel, D.D. (1996) ‘The market for corporate control and innovation’, Academy of Management Review 39(5): 1084–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.-M. and Wright, M. (2000) ‘Strategy in emerging markets’, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E. and Hitt, M.A. (1994) Downscoping: How to Tame the Diversified Firm, Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M.A. (1995) ‘The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal 38(3): 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.A. 1996 ‘Antecedents and outcomes of corporate restructuring’, Journal of Management 22(3): 439–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1998) ‘The economic effects of privatization: evidence from a Russian panel’, Comparative Economic Studies 40(2): 75–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G. (1979) ‘Structural equation models in the social sciences: specification, estimation and testing’, in K.G. Joreskog and D. Sorbom (eds.) Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, Abt Books: Cambridge, MA, pp: 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1999) LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software International: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M.J. and McGrath, R.G. (1996) ‘Improving labor productivity: human resource management policies do matter’, Strategic Management Journal 17(5): 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Spicer, A. (2002) ‘Capital market development and mass privatization are logical contradictions? Lessons from Russia and the Czech Republic’, Industrial and Corporate Change 11(1): 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (2000) ‘What the change of system from socialism to capitalism does and does not mean’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1): 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, K.S., Tse, D.K. and Zhou, N. (2003) ‘Does human resource management matter in a transitional economy? China as an example’, Journal of International Business Studies 34(2): 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, S. and Kreuger, G. (1998) ‘Enterprise restructuring in russia's transition economy: formal and informal mechanisms’, Comparative Economic Studies 40(2): 5–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., Welsh, D. and Rosenkrantz, S. (1993) ‘What do Russian managers really do? An observational study with comparisons to US managers’, Journal of International Business Studies 24(4): 741–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, J.P. (1995) ‘Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems on the world auto industry’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48(2): 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchington, M. and Grugulis, I. (2000) ‘‘Best Practice’ human resource management: perfect opportunity or dangerous illusion?’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(4): 1104–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (1999) Securing Prosperity. The American Labor Market: How It has Changed and What to do about It, Century Foundation: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (2000) ‘Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare’, Industrial and Labor Relations Journal 53(2): 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. (2000) Business Strategies in Transition Economies, Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. and Bae, R. (2003) ‘HR development in South Korea’, Journal of World Business, in press.

  • Sivasubramaniam, N. and Venkata Ratnam, C. (1998) ‘Human resource management and firm performance: the Indian experience’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego.

  • Spenner, K.I., Suhomlinova, O., Tore, S.A., Land, K.C. and Jones, D.C. (1998) ‘Strong legacies and weak markets: Bulgarian state-owned enterprises during early transition’, American Sociological Review 63(4): 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. and Zsoldos, L. (2000) Worker Insecurities in Ukrainian Industry: the 1999 Ukrainian Labour Force Survey, International Labour Office: Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. 2001 ‘Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: hierarchies in post-socialist firms’, in P. DiMaggio (ed.) The Twenty-First Century Firm: Changing Economic Organizations in International Perspective, Princeton University Press: Princeton, pp: 69–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. and Bruszt, L. (1998) Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas III, L.G. and Waring, G. (1999) ‘Competing capitalisms: capital investment in American, German and Japanese firms’, Strategic Management Journal 20(8): 729–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg, R.M., Drenth, P.J.D., Koopman, P.L., van Muijen, J.J. and Wang, Z.-M. (1999) ‘Managing human resources across cultures: a comparative analysis of practices in industrial enterprises in China and the Netherlands’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 10(3): 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (1997) ‘Management-labor relations in the chinese economy’, Human Resource Management Journal 7(4): 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (1998) ‘China's HRM in transition: towards relative convergence?’, in C. Rowley (ed.) Human Resource Management in the Asia Pacific Region, Frank Cass: London, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2000) ‘The future of China's human resource management in its Asia Pacific context: a critical perspective’, Working Paper 29/2000, Judge Institute of Management Studies Cambridge University: Cambridge.

  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T. and Bishop, K. (2002) ‘Foreign partners in the former Soviet Union’, Journal of World Business 37(4): 1765–1179.

  • Wright, P., Dunford, B.B. and Snell, S.A. (2001) ‘Human resources and the resource based view of the firm’, Journal of Management 27(6): 701–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the International Labor Office in making available results from their Ukrainian Labor Force Survey. They thank Guy Standing, Azfar Khan and Laszlo Zsoldos for their personal support and participants at the ILO conference on Ukrainian Labor Market Flexibility in Kiev, April 2001, and the Academy of International Business, Monterrey, USA, July 2003, for their comments. Of course, the authors are responsible for remaining errors and omissions, but we would like to thank our JIBS Departmental Editor, Professor Anand Swaminathan and four anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms and ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Buck.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Sample and population comparisons (see Table 6).

Table a1 Distribution of work force (number of employed) over industrial sectors, %

Appendix 2

Sample description (see Table 7).

Table a2 Industrial sectors and ownership form (%)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Demina, N. et al. Insider ownership, human resource strategies and performance in a transition economy. J Int Bus Stud 34, 530–549 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400065

Keywords

Navigation