Skip to main content
Log in

Legitimacy Dynamics of Professional Support Staff at Higher Education Institutions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The aim of this study is to identify the expressions of legitimacy work available to professional support staff at contemporary higher education institutions (HEIs) and how these expressions can be understood as strategies in their work. Academics are the given audience for this legitimacy work. Professional support staff are commonly described as having blurred boundaries in relation to academics and as actors in a third space. The empirical data comprise 19 interviews with three categories of professional support staff at three HEIs of a technical orientation in Sweden. A finding, in relation to the educational and work experience of these support staff, is that techniques and procedures are at their fingertips in legitimacy work. This also touches upon the more intangible aspects of the categories and structures of the support staff that resemble those of academics. However, one of the main conclusions of this study concerns the strength of the expressions of professional and personal legitimacy in their legitimacy work. This conclusion coincides with the view that they are strong actors in a third space, who use their freedom to form their own roles and the pick and choose among alternative means in their strategies to gain and maintain legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, London: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossu, C., Brown, N. and Warren, V. (2018) ‘Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education: An Introduction’, in C. Bossu and N. Brown (eds). Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education, Singapore: Springer, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botterill, M. (2018) ‘Crossing Boundaries: Projects, Discourses, and Visibility in the Third Space’, in C. Bossu and N. Brown (eds). Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education, Singapore: Springer, pp. 91–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broucker, B., De Wit, K. and Verhoeven, J.C. (2017) ‘Higher Education Research: Looking Beyond New Public Management’, in J. Huisman and M. Tight (eds). Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 21–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., Bossu, C. and Denman, B. (2018) ‘Responding to a Changing Higher Education Sector: The Role of Professional and Support Staff’, in C. Bossu and N. Brown (eds). Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education, Singapore: Springer, pp. 129–138.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coaldrake, P. (2000) ‘Rethinking academic and university work’, Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education 12(3): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011) Research Methods in Education, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D.L. and Suchman, M. (2008) ‘Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism’, in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby and K. Sahlin (eds). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Thousand Okas, CA: Sage, pp. 49–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, L., Kekäle, J., Pinheiro, R. and Sørensen, M.P. (2019) ‘Responsible Universities in Context’, in M.P. Sørensen, L. Geschwind, J. Kekäle and R. Pinheiro (eds). The Responsible University, New York: Springer, pp. 3–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. and Larsen, I.M. (2004) ‘Towards professionalisation? Restructuring of administrative work force in universities’, Higher Education 47(4): 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2013) ‘Changing technologies, changing identities: A case study of professional staff and their contributions to learning and teaching’, Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education 17(2): 62–70.

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C.R. (2002) ‘Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields’, Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. and Andrews, J.A. (1986) ‘Administrators’ Response to Performance and Value Challenges: Stance, Symbols, and Behavior’, in T. Sergiovanni and J.E. Corbally (eds). Leadership and Organizational Culture: New Perspectives on Administrative Theory and Practice, Chicago: University of Illinois press, pp. 170–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons?’ Public Administration 69(1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallenberg, T. (2016) Interacting Spheres Revisited: Academics and Administrators between Dualism and Cooperation, in R.M.O. Pritchard, A. Pausits and J. Williams (eds). Positioning Higher Education Institutions: From Here to There, Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 177–197.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, S. and Ryttberg, M. (2016) ‘Those who walk the talk: The role of administrative professionals in transforming universities into strategic actors’, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. Published online 29 November. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.31537.

  • Kehm, B.M. (2006) ‘Professionalizing Management in Higher Education Institutions’, in J.L.N. Audy and M.C. Morosini (eds). Inovacao e Empreendedorismona Universidada/Innovation and Entrepreneurialism in the University, Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, pp. 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B.M. (2015) ‘The Influence of New Higher Education Professionals on Academic Work’, in U. Teichler and W.K. Cummings (eds). Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession, New York: Springer, pp. 101–111.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T.B. (1999) ‘Institutional strategy’, Journal of Management 25(2): 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linquist, S. (2017) ‘Academic Development: A Space, But Is It an Identity?’ in C. Bossu and N. Brown (eds). Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education, Singapore: Springer, pp. 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (2014) Designing Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (1998) ‘Academics and professional administrators in Australian universities: Dissolving boundaries and new tensions’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 20(2): 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padró, F.F. (2018) ‘Preface’ in C. Bossu and N. Brown (eds). Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education, Singapore: Springer, pp. v–xxii.

  • Rhoades, G.D. (2012) ‘Envisioning Invisible Workforces: Enhancing Intellectual Capital’, in G. Gordon and C. Whitchurch (eds). Academic and Professional Identities in Higher Education, New York: Routledge, pp. 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M. and Scott, W.R. (1998) ‘A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly: 877–904.

  • Ryttberg, M. and Geschwind, L. (2017) ‘Professional support staff at higher education institutions in Sweden: Roles and success factors for the job’, Tertiary Education and Management 23(4): 334–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryttberg, M. and Geschwind, L. (2019) ‘Professional support staff in higher education: Networks and associations as sense givers’, Higher Education 78(6): 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, K. and Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2016) ‘Collegiality in modern universities: The composition of governance ideals and practices’, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy: https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.33640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C. (2015) ‘Work Jurisdiction of New Higher Education Professionals’ in U. Teichler and W.K. Cummings (eds). Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession, New York: Springer, pp. 113–144.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C. and Merkator, N. (2013) ‘The New Higher Education Professionals’, in B.M. Kehm and U. Teichler (eds). The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges, New York: Springer, pp. 53–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1983) ‘Centralization and the Legitimacy Problems of Local Government’ in J.W.Meyer and W.R. Scott (eds). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Scott, W.R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, interests, and Identities, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M.C. (1995) ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szekeres, J. (2011) ‘Professional staff carve out a new space’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33(6): 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szekeres, J. (2004) ‘The invisible workers’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 26(1): 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. and Cummings, W.K. (eds). (2015) Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2007) ‘The changing roles and identities of professional managers in UK higher education’, Perspectives 11(2): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2008) ‘Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly 62(4): 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2015) ‘The Rise of Third Space Professionals: Paradoxes and Dilemmas’, in U. Teichler and W.K. Cummings (eds). Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession, New York: Springer, pp. 79–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malin Ryttberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryttberg, M. Legitimacy Dynamics of Professional Support Staff at Higher Education Institutions. High Educ Policy 35, 218–233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00206-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00206-w

Keywords

Navigation