Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated reporting practice in a developing country—Ghana: legitimacy or stakeholder oriented?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined the integrated reporting (IR) practices of listed firms in Ghana. Thirty-three (33) firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange from 2005 to 2018 were used for the study. A content analysis method was used to examine 412 annual reports of the firms. The level and trend of the IR practices of the firms were analysed according to a 5-point rating scale (average/mean). Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was also used to examine whether there was any significant difference in the level of IR across the years. The evidence showed that the firms made increased positive environmental and social disclosures, as opposed to providing balanced disclosures, suggesting that the firms used IR to manage their respective images. The firms tried to achieve their strategic objectives by reporting information that projected them favourably. Based on the evidence, the study concludes that the IR practices of the firms were strategies to improve their respective public images and to obtain public acceptance. The theoretical conclusion is that the IR practices of firms in Ghana are both legitimacy and stakeholder-oriented. This study provides a significant implication for the government, accounting professional bodies, the Ghana Stock Exchange and firms’ management of the need to provide a framework for the adoption and practice of integrated reporting in Ghana. These results contribute to the literature by providing evidence to show which aspects of IR received more attention and the theories that drive such practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACCA (2013). Understanding investors: Directions for corporate reporting. London: The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. Accessed on 17/108/2017 from https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/financial-reporting/pol-afb-ui02.pdf.

  • Ackah, P., and L.L. Lamptey. 2017. Corporate social responsibility reporting by the banking industry in a developing economy. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 2 (3): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C.A., B. Potter, P.J. Singh, and J. York. 2016. Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review 48: 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, A. 2012. Environmental accounting and reporting practices: Significance and issues: A case from Bangladeshi Companies. Global Journal of Management and Business Research 12 (14): 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae Choi, B., D. Lee, and J. Psaros. 2013. An analysis of Australian company carbon emission disclosures. Pacific Accounting Review 25 (1): 58–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beretta, V., C. Demartini, and S. Trucco. 2019. State of the art of IR disclosure in Europe. A research agenda. Economia Aziendale Online 10 (2): 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, M.A. 2018. Theoretical insights on integrated reporting: The inclusion of non- financial capitals in corporate disclosures. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 23 (4): 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campopiano, G., and A. De Massis. 2015. Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms. Journal of Business Ethics 129 (3): 511–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral anagement of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4): 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casonato, F., F. Farneti, and J. Dumay. 2019. Social capital and integrated reporting: Losing legitimacy when reporting talk is not supported by actions. Journal of Intellectual Capital 20 (1): 144–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagiliene, L. 2010. The research of corporate social responsibility disclosures in annual reports. Engineering Economics 21 (2): 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Raadt, A., M.J. Warrens, R.J. Bosker, and H.A. Kiers. 2019. Kappa coefficients for missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79 (3): 558–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, C., P.C.K. Hsiao, and W. Maroun. 2017. Developing a conceptual model of influences around integrated reporting, new insights and directions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research 25: 450–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C.M. 2019. Legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 32 (8): 2307–2329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., and M. Rankin. 1996. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal 9: 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit, E., R. van Zyl, and G. Schütte. 2017. Integrated reporting by South African companies: a case study. Meditari Accountancy Research 25: 654–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R.G., M.P. Krzus, and S. Ribot. 2015. Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 27: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einwiller, S., C. Ruppel, and A. Schnauber. 2016. Harmonization and differences in CSR reporting of US and German companies: Analyzing the role of global reporting standards and country-of-origin. Corporate Communications: International Journal 21 (2): 230–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasan, M., and C. Mio. 2017. Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in Integrated Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment 26: 288–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J.R. 1990. After virtue? Accounting as a moral and discursive practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 3 (3): 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, M. 2014. Corporate environmental accounting: The issue, its practices and challenges; a study on Indian corporate accounting practices. IOSR Journal of Business and Management 16 (5): 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W.J., and M.M. Cheng. 2019. Materiality judgments in an integrated reporting setting: The effect of strategic relevance and strategy map. Accounting, Organizations and Society 73: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, M.B., and K. Nishitani. 2020. Views of corporate managers on assurance of sustainability reporting: Evidence from Japan. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 17: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haji, A.A., and N.A.M. Ghazali. 2012. The influence of the financial crisis on corporate voluntary disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 9 (2): 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfaya, A., and T. Moussa. 2017. Do board’s corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (8): 1061–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., A. Hecimovic, and A. Choudhury Lema. 2015. Corporate social and environmental responsibility reporting practices from an emerging mobile telecommunications market. Australian Accounting Review 25 (4): 389–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioana, D., and T.T. Adriana. 2014. Research agenda on integrated reporting: New emergent theory and practice. Procedia Economics and Finance 15 (1): 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, A., G. Melloni, and R. Stacchezzini. 2018. Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: The role of preparers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31 (5): 1381–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, S.M. 2002. The discourse of the middle ground: Citizen Shell commits to sustainable development. Management Communication Quarterly 15 (3): 313–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maama, H., and K.O. Appiah. 2019. Green accounting practices: Lesson from an emerging economy. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets 11: 456–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maama, H., M. Mkhize, and A. Kimea. 2019. Institutional investors, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from emerging economy. African Journal of Business and Economic Research 14 (3): 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensah, E., K. Frimpong, and H. Maama. 2017. Environmental reporting practices by listed manufacturing firms: The perspective of an emerging economy. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 2 (3): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mervelskemper, L., and D. Streit. 2017. Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: Is integrated reporting keeping its promise? Business Strategy and the Environment 26: 536–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, D., H. Warsame, and K. Pedwell. 1998. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (3): 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson, M., and C. Deegan. 2002. Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting 37 (2): 183–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, S. 2019. Evaluation of integrated reporting adoption in the financial sector of Kenya. African Journal of Business and Economic Research 14 (3): 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumlee, M., D. Brown, R.M. Hayes, and R.S. Marshall. 2015. Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 34 (4): 336–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramdhony, D. 2015. Corporate social reporting by Mauritian banks. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting 5 (2): 56–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee, Z., and L. Tuo. 2019. Are the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosures associated with the innate and discretionary earnings quality? Journal of Business Ethics 155 (3): 763–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santis, S., M. Bianchi, A. Incollingo, and M. Bisogno. 2019. Disclosure of intellectual capital components in integrated reporting: An empirical analysis. Sustainability 11 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahab, Y., and C. Ye. 2018. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: Empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 15 (2): 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shauki, E. 2011. Perceptions on corporate social responsibility: A study in capturing public confidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (3): 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacchezzini, R., C. Florio, A.F. Sproviero, and S. Corbella. 2019. An intellectual capital ontology in an integrated reporting context. Journal of Intellectual Capital 20 (1): 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M.R., W. Lyles, and P.R. Berke. 2014. Measuring and reporting intercoder reliability in plan quality evaluation research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 34 (1): 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) (2013). The International Integrated Reporting Framework. United Kingdom.

  • Tilt, C.A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility research: The importance of context. International journal of corporate social responsibility 1 (2): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, A., R. Mount, P. Gibbons, M. Vardon, and P. Canadell. 2014. Environmental reporting and accounting in Australia: Progress, prospects and research priorities. Science of the Total Environment 473: 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zyl, A.S. 2013. Sustainability and integrated reporting in the South African corporate sector. International Business & Economics Research Journal 12 (8): 903–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., and J. Sarkis. 2017. Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 162: 1607–1616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R. 2011. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A user perspective. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath School of Management.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Accounting and Informatics: Management Accounting Department, Durban University of Technology (DUT), Durban, South Africa

    Haruna Maama

  2. College of Law and Management Studies: School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of KwaZulu Natal (UKZN), Durban, South Africa

    Msizi Mkhize

Authors
  1. Haruna Maama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Msizi Mkhize
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haruna Maama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maama, H., Mkhize, M. Integrated reporting practice in a developing country—Ghana: legitimacy or stakeholder oriented?. Int J Discl Gov 17, 230–244 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00092-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00092-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation