Skip to main content
Log in

Normalizing the exception: prejudice and discriminations in detention and extraordinary reception centres in Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The human security of both migrants and refugees is at risk at several steps in the process of migration. This work considers that migrants’ human security is not automatically guaranteed once they reach a safe country in Europe either. This article explores how, with the evident will to bypass Italian anti-discriminatory law, derogatory legal instruments, such as law decrees, have been used to increasingly normalize the state of exception with indefinite detention and further extraordinary measures in the system of reception. The analysis of Italian laws, legislative decrees and reports in the field of migration proves that, in Italy, the state of exception has been normalized particularly from 2018 onwards through Salvini’s Security Decrees, to evidently both create additional insecurities for migrants and self-fulfill the initial prejudicial assumption that framed migration as a threat to the nation. The normalization of the exception does not stop at the borders but continues also throughout migrants’ stays, with the consequent increasing entanglement of citizens’ stereotypes and migrants’ discriminations, mainly through a self-fulfillment of prejudice, which further endanger the life of refugees, whose insecurity is left to persist across the entire Italian territory, when instead it should supposedly be a safe country for those in need of a shelter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This list is not exhaustive, but, due to length limits of the article, only the literature that is most relevant to the scope of this work has been included.

  2. This emerged from an interview of 2017 with reception centres’ managers (Bello 2020b).

  3. For the sake of precision, it is necessary to stress that from different interviews and ethnographies conducted for other research, it became clear that indeed there are many managers of extraordinary reception centres that have provided far more than what the reception decree requested them (Bello 2020b).

  4. And not only, but also persons identified as migrants even if they have never crossed any international border (see Bello 2017).

References

  • Aas, K.F., and M. Bosworth, eds. 2013. The borders of punishment: migration, citizenship, and social exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. 2003. Lo stato di eccezione Torino: Bollati Boringhieri 2003 english translation state of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, M. 2018. Irregular immigration in Southern Europe. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, V. 2017. International migration and internbational security. why prejudice is a global security threat. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, V. 2020a. The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU: From the management of a crisis to a governance of human mobility? In Special Issue edited by Valeria Bello and Sarah Léonard. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Online First.

  • Bello, V. 2020b. The role of non-state actors’ cognitions in the spiralling of the securitisation of migration: prejudice, narratives and Italian CAS reception centres. In V. Bello and S. Léonard, eds. “The spiralling of the securitisation of Migration in the EU: From the Management of a crisis to a governance of human mobility?” Special Issue in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Online First.

  • Bonewit, A. 2016. Reception of female refugees and asylum seekers in the EU. Brussels: Policy Department of the European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M. (ed.). 2014a. Borders, Gender and Punishment. Special Issue in Punishment and Society 16 (2): 131–224.

  • Bosworth, M. 2014b. Inside immigration detention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann, et al. 2016. The effect of flexible cognitive–behavioural therapy and medical treatment, including antidepressants on post-traumatic stress disorder and depression in traumatised refugees: Pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry 208 (3): 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervi, L, Tejedor, S (2020) Framing The gypsy problem: Populist electoral use of Romaphobia in Italy (2014–2019). Social Science Online First June 2020.

  • D’Agostino, M. 2017. Beyond the perimeter of depoliticization. The evolution of the global governance of refugees and its territorialisation in Calabria. Partecipazione e Conflitto 10 (2): 544–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dines, N., N. Montagna, and V. Ruggiero. 2015. Thinking Lampedusa: border construction, the spectacle of bare life and the productivity of migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (3): 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R.L. 2011. Bare life: border-crossing deaths and spaces of Moral Alibi. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (4): 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J.F. 2001. On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues 57 (4): 829–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRONTEX. 2017 “Risk Analysis for 2017” FRONTEX Annual Risk Analysis. Online at: https://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Risk_Analysis/Annual_Risk_Analysis_2017.pdf (last retrieved March, 1, 2021).

  • Huysmans, J. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity. Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. Routledge: London and New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I., D. Martin, and C. Minc. 2014. Camps revisited: multifaceted spatialities of a modern political technology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keygnaert, I., N. Vettenburg, K. Roelens, and M. Temmerman. 2014. Sexual health is dead in my body: Participatory assessment of sexual health determinants by refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 14: 416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Repubblica (14 June 2019) “Immigrati. La protezione umanitaria resiste al Decreto Salvini”. Online Available at: <https://www.repubblica.it/solidarieta/immigrazione/2019/06/14/news/immigrati-228752131/?refresh_ce> (last retrieved on 11 November 2019).

  • Lazaridis, G. and Wadia, K. (2015) The Securitisation of Migration in the EU: Debates Since 9/11 (eds). Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke and New York.

  • Mahler, S.J., and P.R. Pessar. 2006. Gender matters: Ethnographers bring gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. International Migration Review 40 (1): 27–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzara, F. 2015. Spaces of visibility for the migrants of Lampedusa: The counter narrative of the aesthetic discourse. Italian Studies 70 (4): 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minca, C. 2017. Space of Exception. In International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth environment and technology, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M.F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R.A. Marston. Blackwell: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudouros, N. 2020. The state of exception in the mediterranean. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norredam, M., A. Mygind, and A. Krasnil. 2006. Access to health care for asylum seekers in the European Union—a comparative study of country policies. The European Journal of Public Health 16 (3): 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T., and R.W. Meertens. 1995. Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology 25: 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puthoopparambil, S.J., and M. Bjerneld. 2016. Detainees, staff, and health care services in immigration detention centres: a descriptive comparison of detention systems in Sweden and in the Benelux countries. Global Health Action 9: 30358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M.B. 2008. When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies 12 (4): 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, D. 2015. Memory and complicity: Migration of holocaust remembrance. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shishehgar, S., L. Gholizadeh, M. DiGiacomo, A. Green, and P.M. Davidson. 2017. Health and socio-cultural experiences of refugee women: An integrative review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 19 (4): 959–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA (2019) “International Migration Report 2019”, Economics and Social Affairs, UN Press, New York. Online at: UNDESA (2015) “International Migration Report 2015”, Economics and Social Affairs, UN Press, New York. Online at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/InternationalMigration2019_Report.pdf (Last retrieved 28 January 2021).

  • Vaughan, C., A. Murdolo, L. Murray, E. Davis, J. Chen, K. Block, R. Quiazon, and D. Warr. 2015. ASPIRE: A multi-site community-based participatory research project to increase understanding of the dynamics of violence against immigrant and refugee women in Australia. BMC Public Health 15: 1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventriglio, A., A. Bellomo, G. Vitrani, E. Stella, A. Gentile, and D. Bhugra. 2017. Migration, violence, and the role of psychiatry in Italy. International Review of Psychiatry 29 (4): 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadia, K (2015) Regimes of Insecurity: Women and Immigration Detention in France and Britain. In Lazaridis, G. and Wadia, K (2015) The Securitisation of Migration in the EU Debates Since (eds). Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke and New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Bello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bello, V. Normalizing the exception: prejudice and discriminations in detention and extraordinary reception centres in Italy. Int Polit 59, 449–464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00290-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00290-8

Keywords

Navigation