Abstract
Marx posited that labour is ‘disciplined, united, organised by the very mechanism of the process of capitalist production’ (1906: 836–37). The regimented nature of factory work and life in an industrial community provided the material basis for collective action and for the shared identity required to support it. But is this still true of the mechanisms of twenty-first century informational capitalism? Castells notes that in informational capitalism, ‘[t]he work process is globally integrated, but labour tends to be locally fragmented’ (Castells 2000: 18). The exploitation of global wage, skill, and regulatory differentials means that workers are often physically, temporally, and administratively detached and desynchronised from each other (Ashford et al. 2007). In the extreme case, coordination of workers’ efforts is achieved algorithmically, that is, by automated data and rule based decision making (O’Reilly 2013), leaving no opportunity for human-to-human communication. Under such dispersal and disconnection, it would seem difficult for a common identity, let alone effective organisation, to arise among workers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
I am indebted to Jörg Flecker for this observation.
References
Allan, P., & Sienko, S. (1998). Job motivations of professional and technical contingent workers: Are they different from permanent workers? Journal of Employment Counseling, 35, 169–178.
Ashford, S. J., George, E., & Blatt, R. (2007). Old assumptions, new work: The opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 65–117.
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2006). Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in a knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.
Cherry, M. (2010). The global dimensions of virtual work. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 54, 471–496.
Davis-Blake, A., & Broschak, J. P. (2009). Outsourcing and the changing nature of work. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 321–340.
Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
Flecker, J., & Meil, P. (2010). Organisational restructuring and emerging service value chains: Implications for work and employment. Work, Employment & Society, 24(4), 680–698.
Graham, M. (2013). Geography/internet: Ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities? The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 177–182.
Harris, M. (2014) Amazon's mechanical Turk workers protest: ‘I am a human being not an algorithm. The Guardian. December 3. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/03/amazon-mechanical-turk-workers-protest-jeff-bezos
Ho, K. C., & Zaheer, B. (2002). ‘Sites’ of resistance: Alternative websites and state-society relations. British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 127–148.
Huws, U., & Dahlmann, S. (2010). New forms of work: New occupational identities. In N. Pupo & M. Thomas (Eds.), Interrogating the ‘new economy’: Restructuring work in the 21st century (pp. 65–92). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Huws, U., Dahlmann, S., Flecker, J., Holtgrewe, U., Schönauer, A., Ramioul, M., et al. (2009). Value chain restructuring in Europe in a global economy. Leuven: HIVA.
Ipeirotis, P. (2010) Demographics of mechanical Turk. NYU Center for Digital Economy Research Working Papers CeDER-10-01. http://hdl.handle.net/2451/29585
Irani, L. (2013) The cultural work of microwork. New Media and Society. Published online before print, doi: 10.1177/1461444813511926.
Irani, L. and Silberman, M. S. (2013) Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk . Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI). New York: ACM.
Karpf, D. (2010). Online political mobilization from the advocacy group’s perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 7–41.
Kingsley, S. C., Gray, M. L. and Suri, S. (2014) Monopsony and the crowd: Labor for lemons? Paper Presented at Internet, Politics, & Policy 2014 Conference, Oxford, UK, September 18–19. http://ipp.oii.ox.ac.uk/sites/ipp/files/documents/Monopsony_and_theCrowd_SCK_MLG_SS.pdf
Kittur, A., Nickerson, J., Bernstein, M. S., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., and Horton, J. J. (2013) The Future of Crowd Work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2013 (1301–1318). New York: ACM.
Kunda, G., Barley, S. R., & Evans, J. A. (2002). Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55, 234–261.
Lehdonvirta, V., & Ernkvist, M. (2011). Knowledge map of the virtual economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lehdonvirta, V., & Räsänen, P. (2011). How do young people identify with online and offline peer groups? A comparison between UK, Spain and Japan. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(1), 91–108.
Marx, K. (1906). Capital. New York: Modern Library.
McLean Parks, J., Kidder, D. L., & Callagher, D. G. (1998). Fitting square pegs into round holes: Mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 697–730.
O’Reilly, T. (2013). Open data and algorithmic regulation. In B. Goldstein & L. Dyson (Eds.), Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation (pp. 289–300). San Francisco: Code for America Press.
Raja, S., Imaizumi, S., Kelly, T., Narimatsu, J., & Paradi-Guilford, C. (2013). Connecting to work: How information and communication technologies could help expand employment opportunities. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.
Riketta, M., & VAN Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 490–510.
Rock, K. W., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). Where do we go from here? Predicting identification among dispersed employees. In B. Moingeon & G. Soenen (Eds.), Corporate and organizational identities (pp. 51–71). London: Routledge.
Ross, J., Zaldivar, A., Irani, L., and Tomlinson, B. (2009) Who are the turkers? Worker demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Social code report 2009–01. http://www.international.ucla.edu/media/files/SocialCode-2009-01.pdf
Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., and Tomlinson, B. (2010) Who are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Mechanical Turk. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Issues in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), (New York: ACM), 2863-2872.
Scholz, T. (Ed.) (2013). Digital labor: The Internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.
Steinkuehler, C. and Williams, D. (2006) Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as ‘third places’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol111/issue4/steinkuehler.html
Streeck, W. (2005). The sociology of labor markets and trade unions. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 254–283). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284–297.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Thatcher, S. M. B., & Zhu, X. (2006). Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification and telecommuting. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1076–1088.
VAN Knippenberg, D., & VAN Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.
Wells, C. (2014). Civic identity and the question of organization in contemporary civic engagement. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 209–216.
Wiesenfeld, B. W., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10, 777–790.
World Bank (2012). Information and Communications for Development 2012: Maximizing Mobile. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank (2013). Feasibility study: Microwork for the palestinian territories. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lehdonvirta, V. (2016). Algorithms that Divide and Unite: Delocalisation, Identity and Collective Action in ‘Microwork’. In: Flecker, J. (eds) Space, Place and Global Digital Work. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48086-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48087-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)