Skip to main content

2016 | Buch

The New International Division of Labour

Global Transformation and Uneven Development

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

This book revisits the debate over the new international division of labour (NIDL) that dominated discussions in international political economy and development studies until the early 1990s. It submits that a revised NIDL thesis can shed light on the specificities of capitalist development in various parts of the world today. Taken together, the contributions amount to a novel value-theoretical approach to understanding the NIDL. This rests upon the distinction between the global economic content that determines the constitution and dynamics of the NIDL and the evolving national political forms that mediate its development. More specifically, the authors argue that uneven development is an expression of the underlying essential unity of the production of relative surplus-value on a world scale. They substantiate and illustrate this argument through several international case studies, including Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Ireland, South Korea, Spain and Venezuela.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Chapter 1. Introduction: The New International Division of Labour and the Critique of Political Economy Today
Abstract
In a recent anthology of his essays on Global Capitalism (2015) Hugo Radice recounts how in the 1960s and early 1970s progressive, broadly Marxist, scholarship fell short of providing a satisfactory means of understanding what was by then a rapidly changing world. The debates back then, he summarises, ‘had little to say directly about the transformations of production and work within firms, or about the political relations between organised economic interests and the state, while international economic relations between states were understood firmly in nineteenth century terms of autonomous and mutually antagonistic powers, great or small’ (Radice 2015: 9). Yet profound and lightning-paced transformations in worldwide production and trade were indeed palpable to any observer back then, and by the mid-1970s Marxist scholars in the UK and beyond were beginning to engage in highly productive—and still influential—debates on the labour process, state theory, and alternative political strategies in the context of deep world recession and heightened social and political tensions across much of the West. Radice recalls, in particular, his participation in a 1974 workshop in Starnberg, Germany, ‘at which Otto Kreye and his colleagues presented the first results of their project on the new international division of labour’. This work, he confirms, was to become ‘very influential for progressive scholarship on global capitalism’.
Greig Charnock, Guido Starosta

Capital and the International Division of Labour

Frontmatter
Chapter 2. The General Rate of Profit and Its Realisation in the Differentiation of Industrial Capitals
Abstract
In this foundational chapter, Iñigo Carrera unfolds his theory of capital accumulation as a global process within which distinct national processes of accumulation emerge as specific concrete forms of that same global process. He argues there is an objective determination relating to the formation of a general rate of profit as the regulator of the unity of this global process, and which engenders a qualitative difference between those capitals that are able to contribute to that formation and those which cannot. The latter sections of the chapter integrate these two arguments so as to present an innovative methodological basis for the re-examination of the ‘classic’ and ‘new’ variants of the international division of labour—one that sharply contrasts with orthodox interpretations of development and underdevelopment.
Juan Iñigo Carrera
Chapter 3. The Global Accumulation of Capital and Ground-Rent in ‘Resource Rich’ Countries
Abstract
The chapter provides fresh insight into the ‘old’ international division of labour and especially into the countries whose long-standing historical role has been to produce ground‐rent‐bearing, primary, commodities. Building upon the notion of capital accumulation as being global in content and national in form, Caligaris challenges the dominant perspective that explains the specific characteristics of those countries as the result of domestic politics, foreign influence and domination, or unequal exchange. He instead advances an original approach based on the recognition that ground‐rent is essentially constituted by the surplus‐value resulting from the valorisation of industrial capitals abroad and which flows into the countries supplying the raw materials. The latter section uses empirical evidence from the case of Argentina to illustrate the core argument.
Gastón Caligaris
Chapter 4. Revisiting the New International Division of Labour Thesis
Abstract
Starosta outlines a thoroughly revised ‘new international division of labour (NIDL) thesis that explains global transformation and uneven development on the basis of the progress of the automation of capitalist large-scale industry, and its impact on the individual and collective productive subjectivity of the working class. Today, in an ever more complex constellation of the NIDL, capital searches worldwide for the most profitable combinations of relative cost and qualities/disciplines resulting from the variegated past histories of the different national fragments of the working class. Each country therefore tends to concentrate a certain type of labour-power of distinctive ‘material and moral’ productive attributes of a determinate complexity, which are spatially dispersed but collectively exploited by capital as a whole in the least costly possible manner.
Guido Starosta

Country Case Studies

Frontmatter
Chapter 5. ‘Post-neoliberalism’ in the International Division of Labour: The Divergent Cases of Ecuador and Venezuela
Abstract
The global rise in primary commodity prices in recent years has put the question of the use of income from natural resources for developmental goals back on the political agenda across Latin America. Purcell examines the distinction between agricultural and mining landownership, in the context of global transformation associated with the international division labour, so as to explain the developmental trajectories of Ecuador and Venezuela. He argues that dual landlordism in Ecuador—in the form of an agro-export elite and a state-controlled oil sector—contrasts with the singular dominance of the state-controlled oil sector in Venezuela, and this, for Purcell, explains the manner in which the two national forms of insertion into the international division of labour have determined different national variants of ‘post-neoliberalism’.
Thomas F. Purcell
Chapter 6. The New International Division of Labour in ‘High-Tech Production’: The Genesis of Ireland’s Boom in the 1990s
Abstract
Friedenthal and Starosta question the debate over the nature of Ireland’s boom in the 1990s, insofar as most commentaries explain the trajectory of the Irish developmental process on the basis of the successful implementation of ‘correct’ nation-state policies. By contrast, they argue that the Irish experience is yet another concrete expression of the further development of the essentially global dynamics of the new international division of labour (NIDL). More specifically, the continuous ‘skill-replacing’ technical change characteristic of the production of relative surplus-value across the globe has allowed capital to integrate national working classes with more ‘skilled’ but still relatively cheaper labour-power into the NIDL, and the peculiar state policies and institutions prevailing in Ireland are grounded in this specific form of integration into the NIDL.
Tomás Friedenthal, Guido Starosta
Chapter 7. New International Division of Labour and Differentiated Integration in Europe: The Case of Spain
Abstract
Charnock, Purcell and Ribera-Fumaz argue that it is of crucial importance to understand the longer-term historical role played within the new international division of labour (NIDL) by relatively late industrialising countries that are today bearing the brunt of crisis and ‘internal devaluation’ in a ‘unified’ Europe. Focusing on Spain, they argue that it is precisely on the material basis of its full integration within the NIDL from the mid-1970s that the conditions of the reproduction of the working class were re-shaped, and it is this ‘historical component’ in the reproduction of the Spanish accumulation process that has prefigured the process of the differentiation of the conditions of the reproduction of the working class within and across its borders ever since.
Greig Charnock, Thomas F. Purcell, Ramon Ribera-Fumaz

Sectoral Case Studies

Frontmatter
Chapter 8. Transnational Corporations and the ‘Restructuring’ of the Argentine Automotive Industry: Change or Continuity?
Abstract
Revisiting the historical development of the Argentine automotive industry from the mid-1950s to the present, Fitzsimons and Guevara challenge the dominant point of view that the development of the new international division of labour led to its qualitative restructuration during the 1990s. Instead, they show that low scales of production, obsolete technology and a resulting low global competitiveness characterised the local auto industry throughout the period. Based on empirical analysis and the international comparison of wages and prices, they argue that transnational automotive-manufacturers compensated for their ‘backwardness’ with the appropriation of a portion of the relatively abundant ground-rent available in Argentina. The NIDL therefore did not replace the old form of industrialisation related to the ‘classic’ international division of labour.
Alejandro Fitzsimons, Sebastián Guevara
Chapter 9. Patterns of ‘State-Led Development’ in Brazil and South Korea: The Steel Manufacturing Industries
Abstract
Grinberg analyses the processes of ‘state-led’ industrialisation in South Korea and Brazil. Challenging mainstream institutionalist accounts, he argues that these have been concrete forms of realisation of the production of relative surplus-value on a world scale. Following Iñigo Carrera, Grinberg claims that this global process has determined capitalist development in Brazil and Korea in specifically different forms. While the process of capital accumulation in Brazil revolves around the production of primary commodities for world markets and the recovery of ground-rent by industrial capital, in South Korea, it centres on the production of industrial commodities for the world market with a highly disciplined and relatively cheap labour-force performing automation-driven simplified functions. Grinberg uses the experience of the steel industries to further explain the bases for ‘state-led industrialisation’.
Nicolas Grinberg
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
The New International Division of Labour
herausgegeben von
Greig Charnock
Guido Starosta
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Electronic ISBN
978-1-137-53872-7
Print ISBN
978-1-137-53871-0
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53872-7