Skip to main content

Robust Control

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Robust control is an approach for confronting model uncertainty in decision making, aiming at finding decision rules which perform well across a range of alternative models. This typically leads to a minimax approach, where the robust decision rule minimizes the worst-case outcome from the possible set. This article discusses the rationale for robust decisions, the background literature in control theory, and different approaches which have been used in economics, including the most prominent approach due to Hansen and Sargent.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, E., L.P. Hansen, and T. Sargent. 2003. A quartet of semi-groups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection. Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 68–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, D.K., B.R. Routledge, and S.E. Zin. 2005. Exotic preferences for macroeconomists. In NBER macroeconomics annual 2004, ed. M. Gertler and K. Rogoff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaÅŸar, T., and P. Bernhard. 1995. H ∞ -optimal control and related minimax design problems. Boston: Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, W. 1967. Uncertainty and the effectiveness of policy. American Economic Review 57: 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., and S.N. Durlauf. 2005. Local robustness analysis: Theory and application. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29: 2067–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., S.N. Durlauf, and K.D. West. 2003. Policy evaluation in uncertain economic environments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2003(1): 235–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burl, J.B. 1999. Linear optimal control: H 2 and H ∞ methods. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagetti, M., L.P. Hansen, T.J. Sargent, and N. Williams. 2002. Robustness and pricing with uncertain growth. Review of Financial Studies 15: 363–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. 2000. Econometric applications of maxmin expected utility theory. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 625–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogley, T., and T.J. Sargent. 2005. The conquest of U.S. inflation: Learning and robustness to model uncertainty. Review of Economic Dynamics 8: 528–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J.C. 1978. Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 23: 756–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J.C., K. Glover, P.P. Khargonekar, and B.A. Francis. 1989. State-space solutions to standard H2 and H∞ control problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 34: 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D., and L.G. Epstein. 1992. Stochastic differential utility. Econometrica 60: 353–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L., and M. Schneider. 2003. Recursive multiple-priors. Journal of Economic Theory 113: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L., and S. Zin. 1989. Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica 57: 937–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannoni, M. 2002. Does model uncertainty justify caution? Robust optimal monetary policy in a forward-looking model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 6: 111–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 1989. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2001. Acknowledging misspecification in macroeconomic theory. Review of Economic Dynamics 4: 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2005a. Robust estimation and control under commitment. Journal of Economic Theory 124: 258–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2005b. Robust estimation and control without commitment, Working paper. Chicago: Department of Economics, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2006. Fragile beliefs and the price of model uncertainty. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., and T.J. Sargent. 2008. Robustness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., T. Sargent, and T. Tallarini. 1999. Robust permanent income and pricing. Review of Economic Studies 66: 873–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L.P., T.J. Sargent, G.A. Turmuhambetova, and N. Williams. 2006. Robust control and model misspecification. Journal of Economic Theory 128: 45–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, D.H. 1973. Optimal stochastic linear systems with exponential performance criteria and their relation to deterministic differential games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC 18: 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M., and E.L. Porteus. 1978. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice. Econometrica 46: 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A.T., and J. Williams. 2003. Robust monetary policy with competing reference models. Journal of Monetary Economics 50: 945–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limebeer, D.J.N., B.D.O. Anderson, and B. Hendel. 1994. A Nash game approach to mixed H 2 /H ∞ control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 39: 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccheroni, F., M. Marinacci, and A. Rustichini. 2006. Dynamic variational preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 128: 4–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maenhout, P.J. 2004. Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Review of Financial Studies 17: 951–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onatski, A., and J.H. Stock. 2002. Robust monetary policy under model uncertainty in a small model of the US economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 6: 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onatski, A., and N. Williams. 2003. Modeling model uncertainty. Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 1087–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, I.R., M.R. James, and P. Dupuis. 2000. Minimax optimal control of stochastic uncertain systems with relative entropy constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 45: 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C.A. 2001. Pitfalls of a minimax approach to model uncertainty. American Economic Review 91: 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiadas, C. 2003. Robust control and recursive utility. Finance and Stochastics 7: 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E. 2001. Robust control made simple. Working paper, Department of Economics, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E.O., and N. Williams. 2006. Monetary policy with model uncertainty: Distribution forecast targeting. Working paper, Department of Economics, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A. 2003. Exchange rate anomalies under model misspecification: A mixed optimal/robust approach. Working paper, Department of Economics, UCLA

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, P. 1981. Risk sensitive linear quadratic Gaussian control. Advances in Applied Probability 13: 764–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zames, G. 1981. Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformations, multiplicative seminorms, and approximate inverses. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26: 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K., J. Doyle, and K. Glover. 1996. Robust and optimal control. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Williams, N. (2008). Robust Control. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2761-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2761-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics