Skip to main content

From Rhetoric to Practice: The Legitimacy of Global Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter critically examines the democratic potential of global public-private partnerships (PPPs) promoting sustainable development and combating climate change. Since the 1990s the multi-stakeholder partnership model has gained ground in environmental, health, and development governance as a complement to intergovernmental environmental agreements. “‘Partnerships’ as a term is rapidly becoming the new mantra shaping the UN discourse on global politics” (Martens, 2007: 4). Multilateral institutions are increasingly outsourcing governance functions to PPPs. Global environmental governance experiments with what has been branded “new” modes of horizontal governance involving multi-stakeholder deliberation between government, market, and civil society actors, where PPPs can be seen as a prime example. These novel forms of public-private collaboration in environmental politics are associated with the “deliberative turn” and a revitalized interest in deliberative democracy (Bäckstrand et al., 2010). Global environmental PPPs are frequently advanced as innovations that can potentially reduce the three deficits of global governance, namely the implementation, governance, and legitimacy deficits (Haas, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andonova, L. and M. Levy (2003) “Franchising Global Governance: Making Sense of the Johannesburg Type II Partnerships,” in O.S. Stocke and Ø.B. Thomessen (eds.) Yearbook of International Cooperation on Environment and Development 2003/04 (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, T., C. Streck, and J.M. Witte (eds.) (2003) Progress or Peril? Networks and Partnerships in Global Environmental Governance: The Post-Johannesburg Agenda (Berlin and Washington, DC: Global Public Policy Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., M. Chan, A. Mert, and P. Pattberg (2007) “Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Does the Promise Hold?” in P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann and A.P.J. Mol (eds.) Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, B. and D. McNeill (2007) Development Issues in Global Governance: Public-Private Partnerships and Market Multilateralism (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. (2006a) “Democratising Global Environmental Governance: Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development,” European Journal of International Relations, 12: 467–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. (2006b) “Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness,” European Environment, 16: 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., J. Khan, A. Kronsell, and E. Lövbrand (2010) Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K. (2007) The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J., H. Winkler, J. Corfee-Morlot, and F. Gagnon-Lebrun (2007) “CDM: Taking Stock and Looking Forward,” Energy Policy, 35 (1): 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Ruth and Robert O. Keohane (2005) “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,” American Political Science Review, 99 (1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. (2008) “Delegation and Accountability in the Clean Development Mechanism: The New Authority of Non-State Actors,” Journal of International Law and International Relations, 4: 21–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2005) “The Effectiveness of Non-State Governance Schemes: A Comparative Study of Forest Certification in Norway and Sweden,” International Environmental Agreements, 5: 125–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (2004) “Addressing the Global Governance Deficit,” Global Environmental Politics, 4 (4): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T. and D. Mauzerall (2004) “Thinking Globally and Acting Locally: Can the Johannesburg Partnerships Coordinate Action on Sustainable Development?” Journal of Environment and Development, 13: 220–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Olsen K. (2007) “The Clean Development Mechanism’s Contribution to Sustainable Development: A Review of the Literature,” Climatic Change, 84: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq, F. and P. Ambrosi (2007) “The Clean Development Mechanism: History, Status, and Prospects,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1: 134–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, L. (ed.) (2006) Special Issue. “Carbon Trading: A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatisation and Power,” Development Dialogue, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövbrand, E., J. Nordquist, and T. Rindefjäll (2009) “Closing the Legitimacy Gap in Global Environmental Governance: Lessons from the Emerging CDM Market,” Global Environmental Politics, 9 (2): 74–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. (2007) “Multistakeholder Partnerships — Future Models of Multilateralism?” Occasional Papers, 29 (Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mert, A. (2009) “Partnerships for Sustainable Development as Discursive Practice: Shifts in Discourses on Environment and Democracy,” Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (2): 109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson, E. (2009a) “A Review of the CDM Literature: From Fine-Tuning to Critical Scrutiny?” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9: 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson, E. (2009b) “Dysfunctional Delegation: Why the Design of the Clean Development Mechanism’s Supervisory System is Fundamentally Flawed,” Paper Presented at the International Studies Association’s 50th Annual Convention (New York City) (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2004) “Global Governance and Communicative Action,” Government and Opposition, 39: 288–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (2006) Problem Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the European Union (Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L. (2008) “A Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) with Atmospheric Benefits for a Post-2012 Climate Regime,” Discussion Paper, 25 (Berlin: Öko-Institut).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäferhoff, M., S. Campe, and C. Kaan (2009) “Transnational Public-Private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks and Results,” International Studies Review, 11: 451–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2003) Deliberative Democracy and the Environment (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streck, C. (2004) “New Partnerships in Global Environmental Policy: The Clean Development Mechanism,” The Journal of Environment Development, 13: 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streck, C. and J. Lin (2008) “Making Markets Work: A Review of CDM Performance and the Need for Reform,” The European Journal of International Law, 19: 409–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008) Partnerships for Sustainable Development — Report of the Secretary General, E/CN.17/2008/1, Commission on Sustainable Development, Sixteenth Session (May 5–16) (New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2008) Meeting Report of the Forty-Fourth Meeting of the Executive Board of the Clean Development Mechanism, CDM-EB-44 (November 28, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D.G., K. Raustilia, and E. Skolnikoff (1998) The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Treaties: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wara, V. (2007) “Is the Global Carbon Market Working?” Nature, 445: 595–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss Brown, E. and H. Jacobson (2000) Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. (1999) The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Karin Bäckstrand

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bäckstrand, K. (2010). From Rhetoric to Practice: The Legitimacy of Global Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development. In: Bexell, M., Mörth, U. (eds) Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283237_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics