Abstract
After outlining why it is important to analyse and address terrorism, corruption and organised crime together, the chapter briefly considers definitional and measurement problems involved in researching these phenomena. In the next section, the situation over the past 15 years in a number of EU and Asian (ASEAN plus China, India, Japan and South Korea) states is considered. This is followed by an analysis of the methods used by states and international organisations (IOs) in Europe and Asia to combat all three phenomena. It is argued in the conclusions that it is often inappropriate to talk of either ‘European’ or ‘Asian’ situations or approaches, given significant differences between countries in both continents. But there are some contexts in which generalisations can be made. One relates to levels of democratisation and attitudes towards civil rights, while another contrasts attitudes towards sovereignty and principles. The implications of these differences on the battle against terrorism, corruption and organised crime are considered, and it is argued that, on balance, Asia has more to learn from Europe than vice versa. But in both continents, for reasons explained, states and IOs will continue to fight an uphill battle to control these phenomena.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2010) Democracy Index 2010: Democracy in Retreat (EIU: London).
Holmes, L. (ed.) (2007) Terrorism, Organised Crime and Corruption: Networks and Linkages (Cheltenham: Elgar).
—. (ed.) (2010) Trafficking and Human Rights: European and Asia-Pacific Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar).
Kruisbergen, E., de Jong, D. and Kleemans, E. (2011) ‘Undercover Policing: Assumptions and Empirical Evidence’, British Journal of Criminology, 51/2: pp. 394–412.
Leader, E. (2012) ‘Does the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration Even Matter?’ Available at: http://blogs.cfr.org/asia/2012/09/28/does-the-asean-human-rights-declaration-even-matter/ (accessed 1 October 2012).
Riaño J., Hodess, R. and Evans, A. (2009) Global Corruption Barometer 2009 (Berlin: Transparency International).
Schwab K. (ed.) (2010) The Global Competitiveness Report 2010–2011 (Geneva: World Economic Forum).
Van Dijk, J. (2007a) ‘Mafia Markers: Assessing Organized Crime and its Impact Upon Societies’, Trends in Organized Crime, 10/4: pp. 39–56.
—. (2007b) ‘The International Crime Victims Survey and Complementary Measures of Corruption and Organised Crime’, in M. Hough and M. Maxfield, Surveying Crime in the 21st Century (Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 22) (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press): pp. 125–144.
Van Dijk, J., van Kesteren, J. and Smit, P. (2007) Criminal Victimisation in International Perspective: Key Findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS (Tilburg University, UNICRI & UNODC).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Leslie Holmes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holmes, L. (2013). Dealing with Terrorism, Corruption and Organised Crime: The EU and Asia. In: Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., Murray, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378704_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378704_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49454-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37870-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)