Skip to main content

Here Comes the Revolution — the European Digital Agenda

  • Chapter

Abstract

The challenge of building an inclusive, equitable and sustainable European information society is at the heart of A Digital Agenda for Europe (European Commission, 2010a). These aspirations are not themselves very controversial. They become so, however, when the strategies aimed at achieving them are examined with respect to the emphasis that is given to supply-side and demand-side means of policy intervention. Should policy-makers privilege supply-side measures aimed at stimulating digital technology innovation and economic growth and competitiveness, or, alternatively, should they give at least as much, or greater, emphasis to demand-side measures tofoster citizen capabilities for taking advantage of ICT-based networks and services? The Digital Agenda is the latest in a series of strategic EU initiatives. The EC’s DG Communications Net-works, Content and Technology oversees it, perhaps signifying a rebalancing of policy priorities given the name change from information society and media in mid-2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berkman Center. (2010). Next Generation Connectivity: A Review of Broadband Internet Transitions and Policy from around the World. Boston, MA: Berkman Center for the Internet and Society, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. (2007). Path Dependence: A Foundational Concept. Cliometrica, 1(2), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, K. (2012). Public Service Media and Policy in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, W. H. (1999). Society on the Line: Information Politics in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1993, 5 December). Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways forward into the 21st Century, white paper. Brussels: European Commission, COM(93)700 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994a, 26 May). Europe and the Global Information Society: Recommendations to the European Council (Bangemann report). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994b, 19 July). Europe’s Way to the Information Society: An Action Plan. Brussels: European Commission, COM(94)347 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1997a, 15 April). Building the European Information Society for Us All: Final Policy Report of the High-Level Expert Group. Luxembourg: Directorate General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs, High-level Expert Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1997b, 10 November). Protocol on the System of Public Broad-casting in the Member States in the Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the treaty on European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Related acts: European Commission, OJ C340.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999, 8 December). Communication on a Commission Initiative for the Special European Council of Lisbon, 23–24 March 2000 — Europe — an Information Society for All. Brussels: European Commission COM(99) 0687 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000, 24 March). Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001, 23–24 March). eEurope: Impact and Priorities. Brussels: European Commission COM(2001)140 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002, 21–22 June). eEurope 2005: An Information Society For All — An Action Plan. Brussels: European Commission COM(2002) 263 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005a, 1 June). i2010 — A European Information Society for Growth and Employment, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission COM(2005)229.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005b). Preliminary Analysis of the Contribution of EU Information Society Policies and Programmes to the Lisbon and Sustainable Development Strategies: Final Report. Brussels: Report prepared by ECOTEC Research and Consulting Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005c, 23 March). Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008, 26 November). A European Economic Recovery Plan. Brussels: European Commission COM(2008)800 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009a, 30 March). Critical Information Infrastructure Protection. Brussels: European Commission, SEC(2009)399/400, COM(2009) 149 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009b, 18 December). Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 Amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communication networks and services, 2002/19/EC on Access to, and Interconnection of, Electronic Communication Networks and Associated Facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the Authorization of Electronic Communication Networks and Serivces. Brussels: European Commission, OJ L337/37.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009c, 4 August). Europe’s Digital Competitiveness Report: Main Achievements of the i2010 Strategy 2005–2009. Brussels: European Commission COM(2009)390.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009d, 13 March). A Strategy for ICT R&D and Innovation in Europe: Raising the Game, Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels: European Commission SEC(2009)289.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010a, 19 May). A Digital Agenda for Europe. Brussels: European Commission COM(2010)245 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010b, 19 May). Digital Agenda for Europe: Key Initiatives. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010c, 15 April). Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audio Visual Media Services (audiovisual media services directive) Brussels: European Commission, OJ L 95/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010d, 3 March). Europe 2020: a European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2010)2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010e, no date). Summary of Responses to the Public Consultation — Priorities for a New Strategy for European Information Society 2010–2015. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Foresight Platform. (2011). Digital Europe 2030: Scenarios for ICT in Future Governance and Policy Making. Seville: European Foresight Platform EFP Brief No. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Voice. (2004). Lisbon Agenda Reduces to ‘Nothing’, Declares Kok. European Voice, 10(36), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falch, M. (2007). Pentration of Broadband Services: The Role of Policies. Telematics and Informatics, 24(4), 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falch, M. & Henten, A. (2010). Public Private Partnerships as a Tool for Stimulating Investments in Broadband. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FCC. (2010). Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan. Washington DC: Federal Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Egui, G., Tian, Y. & Stewart, C. M. (2010). Framing the Information Society: A Comparison of Policy Approaches by the USA and the EU. In S. Papathanassopoulos and R. Negrine (Eds.), Communications policy: theories and issues (pp. 179–199). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, A. (1993). Remarks by Vice President Albert Gore at the National Press Club. Washington DC, 21 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, M. E. (2010). Towards a Closer Digital Alliance. SAIS Review, 30(2), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2012, June). Draft Communications Data Bill. London: Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Education. (2009). CIVICWEB — Young People, the Internet and Civic Participation. London: Institute of Education, University of London, D17 Report, Project No. 028357, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, H., Dutton, W. & Williams, R. (Eds.) (1998). The Social Shaping of In formation Superhighways: European and American Roads to the Information Society. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T. (1998). The Difficulties in Assessing the Impact of EU Framework Programmes. Research Policy, 27(6), 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R. (2012). Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R. & Raboy, M. (2011). Introduction: Foundations of the Theory and Practice of Global Media and Communication Policy. In R. Mansell and M. Raboy (Eds.), Handbook on Global Media and Communication Policy (pp. 1–20). New York: Blackwell-Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R. & Steinmueller, W. E. (2013a). Copyright Infringement Online: The Case of the Digital Economy Act Judicial Review in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1312–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R. & Steinmueller, W. E. (2013b). Digital Infrastructures, Economies, and Public Policies: Contending Rationales and Outcome Assessment Strategies. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 509–530). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melody, W. H. (2011). Liberalization in the Telecom Sector. In M. Finger and R. W. Kunneke (Eds.), International Handbook of Network Industries (pp. 103–122). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalis, M. (2010). EU Broadcasting Governance and PSB: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. In P. Iosifidis (Ed.), Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond (pp. 36–48). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2006). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Washington DC: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Broadband Growth and Policies in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Report for ministerial meeting on the future of the internet economy, Seoul, South Korea 17–18 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2012). Online infringement of Copyright: Implementation of the Online Infringement of Copyright (Initial Obligations) (Sharing of Costs) Order 2012. London: of Com Consultation, 26 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papathanassopoulos, S. & Negrine, R. (2010). Approaches to Communication Policy: an Introduction., In S. Papathanassopoulos and R. Negrine (Eds.), Communications policy: theories and issues (pp. 3–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, J. & Renda, A. (2011). Single e-comms Market? No Such thing.… CEPS Policy Brief, 231, 11 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y. & Siokas, E. (2010). Policy-Driven Collaborative Research Networks. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(4), 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppis, M. (2010). Media Governance: A New Concept for the Analysis of Media Policy and Regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(2), 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raboy, M., Landry, N. & Shtern, J. (2010). Digital Solidarities, Communication Policy and Multi-stakeholder Global Governance: The Legacy of the World Summit on the Information Society. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegen University. (2010). Study on the Social Impact of ICT (CPP No. 55A — SMART No 2007/0068) Final Version. Siegen: Fachbereich Wirtschaftsinformatik und Neue Medien and Others.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. M., Gil-Egui, G., Tian, Y. & Pileggi, M. I. (2006). Framing the Digital Divide: a Comparison of US and EU Policy Approaches. New Media & Society, 8(6), 731–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Government. (2010). Digital Economy Act 2010 (c.24). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Government. (2009). American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Washington DC: 111th Congress of the United States of America, Senate and House of Representatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Reenen, J., Bloom, N., Draca, M., Kretschmer, T. & Sadun, R. (2010). The Economic Impact of ICT SMART No. 2007/0020. London: Enterprise LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberpole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Robin Mansell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mansell, R. (2014). Here Comes the Revolution — the European Digital Agenda. In: Donders, K., Pauwels, C., Loisen, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032195_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics