Skip to main content

Magali Sarfatti Larson and Anne Witz: Professional Projects, Class and Gender

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine

Abstract

One of the key problematics in the sociological study of health and healthcare is the stratification of the healthcare division of labour, with the profession of medicine holding a dominant position: a feature particularly notable in Anglo/American societies. How this was achieved historically and what have been and continue to be the consequences of these dynamics has been the focus of many sociological treatises and scholars from Talcott Parsons (1951) to Everett Hughes (1958) to Eliot Freidson (1970) and others. Two key theorists who address this problematic in a particularly novel way are Magali Sarfatti Larson and Anne Witz. They do so by drawing on the neighbouring literature of the sociology of professions and advancing the concept of professional projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, T. (2000) A Dentist and a Gentleman: Gender and the Rise of Dentistry in Ontario. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, T. and Bourgeault, I.L. (2003) ‘Feminism and Women’s Health Professions in Ontario’ Women and Health 38(4):73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeault, I.L. (2000) ‘Delivering the “new” Canadian Midwifery: The Impact on Midwifery of Integration into the Ontario Healthcare System’ Sociology of Health and Illness 22(2): 172–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeault, I.L. (2005) ‘Gendered Professionalization Strategies and the Rationalization of Healthcare: Midwifery, Nurse Practitioners, and Hospital Nurse Staffing in Ontario, Canada’ Knowledge, Work and Society 3(l):25–

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeault, I.L. and Fynes, M.T. (1997) ‘The Integration of Nurse-and Lay Midwives in the U.S. and Canada’ Social Science and Medicine 44(7): 1051–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, JA. (1993) Book Reviews: Professions and Patriarchy. Anne Witz. Routledge: London, 1992 Journal of Sociology 1993 29:141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. (1987) ‘Gender, Status and Professionalism’ Sociology 21:413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (Ed.) (1969) The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, and Social Workers. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1970) Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. Atherton: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heagerty, B.V. (1990) Class, Gender and Professionalization: The Struggle for British Midwifery, 1900–1936. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E.C. (1958) Men and their Work. The Free Press: Glencoe, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T.J. (1972) Professions and Power. Macmillan: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T.J. (1977) ‘The Professions in the Class Structure’ in Scase, R. (ed.) Industrial Society, Class Cleavage and Control. George Allen and Unwin: London, pp. 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M.S. (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M.S. (1979) ‘Professionalism: Rise and Fall’ International Journal of Health Services 9: 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, V. (1976) Medicine Under Capitalism. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, F. (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. Tavistock: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. The Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimlinger, G. (1979) ‘Review of: The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis by Magali Sarfatti Larson’ The Journal of Economic History 39(3):858–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushing, B. (1993) ‘Ideology in the Reemergence of North American Midwifery’ Work and Occupations 20:46–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (2007) ‘Obituary: Anne Marie Witz’ Gender, Work and Organization 14(5):498–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R.L. and Simpson, LH. (1969) ‘Women and Bureaucracy in the Semi — Professions’ in Etzioni, A (ed.) The Semi-Professions and Their Organization Free Press: New York. pp. 196–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowitz, D.J. (1993) ‘Professions and Patriarchy by Anne Witz’ The Business History Review 67(1): 186–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witz, A. (1990) ‘Patriarchy and Professions: The Gendered Politics of Occupational Closure’ Sociology 24(4):675–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witz, A. (1992) Professions and Patriarchy. Routledge: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Ivy Lynn Bourgeault

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bourgeault, I.L. (2015). Magali Sarfatti Larson and Anne Witz: Professional Projects, Class and Gender. In: Collyer, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137355621_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics