Abstract
Current visions of human enhancement are rooted in visions of the future that were developed in Great Britain in the late 19th century and in the first third of the 20th century by a number of leading scientists and science-savvy authors, such as John Desmond Bernal and Herbert George Wells. The visions are thereby rooted in a historical situation in Britain which was marked by a conflict between the defenders of Christianity, traditional society and its values on the one hand, and socialist or technocratic, post-Darwinian progressives on the other. The latter group developed a worldview with strong similarities to traditional religious worldviews, in particular with regard to their eschatological elements. This new worldview — which can be termed an ideology of extreme progress — has proved to be remarkably successful, above all in recent years, and is most often known today as ‘transhumanism’. It certainly serves different functions today than in the early 20th century, and its political context has changed significantly. However, the technoscientific imaginaries, which appear to be consistent, have remained more or less the same, with the exception of some updates regarding the relevant technologies and sciences. Visions of human enhancement are still a core element of this persistent ideology of extreme progress and perform an important function within it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anders G. (1956) Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution ( München: Beck, 2002 ).
Bernal J.D. (1929) The World, the Flesh and the Devil. An Inquiry into the Future of the Three Enemies of the Rational Soul ( London: Jonathan Cape, 1970 ).
Blumenberg H. (1966) The Legitimacy of the Modern Age ( Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press, 1983 ).
Butler S. (1872) Erewhon: or Over the Range ( London: Trubner and Co.).
Coenen C. (2009) ‘Zauberwort Konvergenz’, Technikfolgenabschätzung — Theorie und Praxis ( TATuP) , 18(2), 44–50.
Coenen C. (2010) ‘Immagini di società potenziate dalla nanotecnologia. L’ascesa dell’ideologia postumanista del progresso estremo’, Amistani F. and Arnaldi S. (transl.), in Arnaldi S. and Lorenzet A. (eds) Innovazione in corso. Il dibattito sulle nanotecnologie fra diritto, etica e società ( Bologna: Il Mulino ), pp. 225–58.
Coenen C., Schuijff M., Smits M., Pim K., Hennen L., Rader M., Wolbring G. (2009) Human Enhancement (Brussels: European Parliament), IP/A/STOA/ FWC/2005–28/SC32 & 39, www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/publications/studies/stoa2007–13_En.pdf.
Darwin C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: John Murray), Vol. 2, first edn, scanned by John van Wyhe, http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID003DF937.2&viewtype003Dtext&pageseq003D1 Accessed September 9, 2013.
Gauchet M. (1985) The Disenchantment of the World. A Political History of Religion ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997 ).
Haldane J.B.S. (1923) Daedalus or Science and the Future ( a paper read to the heretics, Cambridge, 4 February 1923) (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1925 ).
Haldane J.B.S. (1927a) The Last Judgment. A Scientist’s Vision of the Future of Man ( New York and London: Harper and Brothers).
Haldane J.B.S. (1927b) ‘Man’s destiny’, in Haldane J.B.S., The Inequality of Man (Harmondsworth: Pelican Books, 1932, 2nd edn 1937 ), pp. 140–5.
Haldane J.B.S. (1932) ‘Possibilities of human evolution’, in Haldane J.B.S., The Inequality of Man (Harmondsworth: Pelican Books, 1932, 2nd edn 1937 ), pp. 82–99.
Hillegas M. (1967) The Future as Nightmare. H. G. Wells and the Anti-Utopians ( New York: Oxford University Press).
Hogan D. and Clarfield M. (2007) ‘Venerable or vulnerable: ageing and old age in JRR Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings ’, Medical Humanities 33, 5–10.
Huxley A. (1932) Brave New World ( London: Chatto & Windus).
Khushf G. (2005) ‘The use of emergent technologies for enhancing human performance: are we prepared to address the ethical and political issues?’, Public Policy & Practice (e-journal), 4(2), n.p., http://www.ipspr.sc.edu/ejournal/Archives0805.asp.
Kurzweil R. (2005) The Singularity Is Near ( New York: Viking Penguin).
Löwith K. (1949) Meaning in History ( Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press )
Meadows J. (2004) The Victorian Scientist. The Growth of a Profession ( London: The British Library).
Nordmann A. (2008a) ‘Ignorance at the heart of science’, in Ach J.S. and Lüttenberg B. (eds) Nanobiotechnology, Nanomedicine and Human Enhancement ( Berlin: LIT Verlag ), pp. 113–32.
Nordmann A. (2008b) ‘No future for nanotechnology? Historical development vs global expansion’ in Jotterand F. (ed.) Emerging Conceptual, Ethical and Policy Issues in Nanobiotechnology ( Netherlands: Springer ), pp. 43–63.
Parrinder P. (1995) Shadows of the Future. H.G. Wells, Science Fiction and Prophecy ( Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).
Pope A. (1733) An Essay on Man. Addressed to a Friend. Part 1 ( London: J. Wilford ).
Reade W.W. (1872) The Martyrdom of Man ( Chestnut Hill: Adamant Media Corporation, 2005 ).
Saunders M. and Hurwitz B. (2009) ‘The To-day and To-morrow Series and the popularization of science: an introduction’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews , 34(1), 3–8.
Schneider S. (2009) ‘Future minds: transhumanism, cognitive enhancement, and the nature of persons’, in Ravitsky V., Fiester A. and Caplan A. L. (eds) The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics ( New York: Springer ), pp. 95–110.
Slusser G. (2009) ‘Dimorphs and doubles: J. D. Bernal’s “Two cultures” and the transhuman promise’, in Westfahl G. and Slusser G. (eds) Science Fiction and the Two Cultures. Essays on Bridging the Gap between the Sciences and the Humanities ( Jefferson: McFarland & Co. ), pp. 96–130.
Stableford B. (1985) Scientific Romance in Britain 1890–1950 ( London: Fourth Estate ).
Taylor C. (2007) A Secular Age ( Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Wells H.G. (1902) The Discovery of the Future (A discourse delivered to the Royal Institution on 24 January 1902 ) ( London: T. Fisher Unwin ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Christopher Coenen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coenen, C. (2015). The Earth as Our Footstool: Visions of Human Enhancement in 19th and 20th Century Britain. In: Bateman, S., Gayon, J., Allouche, S., Goffette, J., Marzano, M. (eds) Inquiring into Human Enhancement. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530073_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530073_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56354-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53007-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)