Skip to main content
Log in

McKitterick's Conundrum

  • Opinion Piece
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Call for Papers of this Special Issue introduced its theme by saying that: ‘Increasing consumer power, accelerated by the meteoric rise of social media, threatens the foundations of branding’. This article examines the intellectual and operational conditions that created modern theories of marketing and branding to show that developments such as increasing consumer empowerment are not a threat to the foundations of branding. They are a threat to the foundations of an outdated and incoherent theory of branding: the persuasion paradigm, defined broadly here as the quest for the skills needed to ‘make the customer do what suits the interests of the business’. The article shows how, far from helping build brands, the persuasion paradigm has led marketers to misallocate resources, undermine customer trust and fail to recognise far-reaching changes in the marketing environment – especially the rise of a new and separate market for decision-support services; the market for ‘better decisions’ as well as ‘better products and services’. By discarding the persuasion paradigm and reorienting brands as information services, marketers can regain the high ground of consumer trust and value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ariely, D. (2010) Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.S. (2010) Persuasive Advertising: Evidence-based Principles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cziko, G. (2000) The Things We Do: Using the Lessons of Bernard and Darwin to Understand the What, How, and Why of Our Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman, D. (2011) Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. Edinburgh, UK: Canongate Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A.S.C., Goodhart, G.J. and Barwise, T.P. (1990) Double jeopardy revisited. Journal of Marketing 54 (3): 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, W. (2008) Powers of Persuasion: The Inside Story of British Advertising. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, T., LaBerge, L. and Magill, P. (2011) We’re all marketers now. McKinsey Quarterly. July, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Marketing/Strategy/Were_all_marketers_now_2834, accessed 5 July 2012.

  • Gleick, J. (1997) Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. (2012) Seducing the Subconscious: The Psychology of Emotional Influence in Advertising. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. (1996) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1972) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1999) Kotler on Marketing: How to Create, Win and Dominate Markets. New York: The Free Press, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (1996) The Principles of Marketing, 7th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laran, J., Dalton, A.N. and Adrade, E.B. (2011) Why consumers rebel against slogans. Harvard Business Review, November, p. 34.

  • Lefroy, T. (2011) The unhidden persuaders. RSA Journal. Autumn, http://www.thersa.org/large-text/fellowship/journal/archive/autumn-2011/features/the-unhidden-persuaders, accessed 5 July 2012.

  • Li, C. and Bernoff, J. (2008) Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Market Research Bulletin., 10 September 2009.

  • Mauboussin, M.J. (2011) Embracing complexity. Harvard Business Review, September.

  • McKinsey Global Institute. (2011) Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity, http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/technology_and_innovation/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation, accessed 5 July 2012.

  • Metzinger, T. (2009) The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C.R. (1946) The Process of Persuasion. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norretranders, T. (1991) The User Illusion. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, V. (1957, 1981) The Hidden Persuaders, 2nd edn. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2002) The Blank Slate. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B.F. (1950) Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review 57 (4): 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, S. (1992) Irrationality. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Michigan: Caravan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsh, D. (2006) Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations: A Story of Discovery. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B. (1919) Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviourist. Philadelphia, PA and London: J.B. Lippincott Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F.E. (1994) Market-Driven Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, R. (2009) Speech: ‘can advertising survive’, at the battle of the big thinking, http://robinwight.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/robin-wight-battle-of-big-thinking-26112009.pdf.

  • Zuboff, S. and Maxmin, J. (2002) The Support Economy: Why Corporations Are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Mitchell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, A. McKitterick's Conundrum. J Brand Manag 20, 80–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.52

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.52

Keywords

Navigation