Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of brand communities for rival brands: Negative brand ratings, negative stereotyping of their consumers and negative word-of-mouth

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of understanding competitive influences in the marketplace is well understood, but most prior brand community research has focused on the positive ramifications for the focal brand rather than on the negative repercussions for competing brands. This research introduces a conceptual model that uses Social Identity Theory and the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) as theoretical frameworks for investigating negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) about out-group brands, negative ratings of out-group brands and negative stereotyping of out-group brand consumers by brand community members. Using a Macintosh User Group (MUG) as the research context, the results of the study demonstrate that as MUG members more strongly identify with the community they perceive themselves to be more prototypical members. Higher levels of prototypicality are then shown to lead to lower out-group brand ratings that, in turn, lead to increased negative stereotyping of out-group brand consumers along both dimensions of the SCM (warmth and competence) and to increased NWOM about out-group brands. Based on the support found for the conceptual model, theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J., Vohs, K.D. and Mogilner, C. (2010) Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research 37 (2): 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, D. and Hogg, M.A. (1988) Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (4): 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U.M. and Hermann, A. (2005) The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing 69 (3): 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple User Group Resources. (2012) User groups FAQ, http://appleusergroupresources.com/?page_id=203, accessed 1 May 2012.

  • Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y. and Phillips, L.W. (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3): 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, J. and Hoogendam, K. (2011) The role of social identity and attitudes toward sustainability brands in buying behaviors for organic products. Journal of Brand Management 18 (9): 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D.J., Ruscher, J.B. and Schnake, S.B. (2001) No benefit of the doubt: Intergroup bias in understanding causal explanation. British Journal of Social Psychology 40 (4): 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, L. and Bech-Larsen, T. (2010) Two studies of consequences and actionable antecedents of brand love. Journal of Brand Management 17 (7): 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B. (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (5): 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.P. (1995) The moderating effects of insupplier/outsupplier status on organizational buyer attitudes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (3): 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 136–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E.G. and McIver, J.P. (1981) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. In: G.W. Bohrnstedt and E.F. Borgatta (eds.) Social Measurement: Current Issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 63–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T. and Glick, P. (2007) The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (4): 631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A.J.C. et al (2009) Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology 48 (1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donavan, D.T., Janda, S. and Suh, J. (2006) Environmental influences in corporate brand identification and outcomes. Journal of Brand Management 14 (1/2): 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., DeVries, N. and Wilke, H. (1988) Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (6): 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C. and Glick, P. (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science 11 (2): 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P. and Xu, J. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (6): 878–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, J.R. (2009) ‘Local People’ a critical dimension for place brands. Journal of Brand Management 16 (7): 420–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. and Ferguson, J.M. (1994) Using membership as a marketing tool: Issues and applications. In: J.N. Sheth and A. Parvatoyar (eds.) Relationship Marketing: Theory, Methods and Applications. Atlanta, GA: Center for Relationship Marketing, Roberto C. Goizueta Business School, pp. 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop, L.A., Lu, I.R.R. and Cray, D. (2009) Australian consumers’ attitudes toward France a decade after nuclear testing: Evidence of forgiveness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 8 (4): 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A. and Abrams, D. (2003) Intergroup behavior and social identity. In: M.A. Hogg and J. Cooper (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 407–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A. and Hardie, E.A. (1991) Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (2): 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Wieseke, J. and Hoyer, W.D. (2009) Social identity and the service-profit chain. Journal of Marketing 73 (2): 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A.M. (2006) Strategic Database Marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D. (2010) Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1): 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahney, L. (2004) The Cult of Mac. San Francisco: No Starch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D.A. (2010) Measuring model fit, http://www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm, accessed 20 June 2011.

  • Kozinets, R.V. and Handelman, J.M. (2004) Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (3): 691–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R.V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A.C. and Wilner, S.J.S. (2010) Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing 74 (2): 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loken, B. and John, D.R. (1993) Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? Journal of Marketing 57 (3): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loken, B. and Ward, J. (1990) Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality. Journal of Consumer Research 17 (2): 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlexander, J.H., Schouten, J.W. and Koening, H.F. (2002) Building brand community. Journal of Marketing 66 (1): 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz Jr, A.M. and O'Guinn, T.C. (2001) Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research 27 (4): 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz Jr, A.M. and Schau, H.J. (2005) Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (4): 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz Jr, A.M. and Schau, H.J. (2007) Vigilante marketing and consumer-created communications. Journal of Advertising 36 (3): 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, J.G., Wann, D.L. and Branscombe, N.R. (1995) Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity towards outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (1): 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M.S. (2005) The symbolic servicescape: Your kind is welcomed here. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 4 (4): 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscher, J.B. (2001) Prejudiced Communication: A Social Psychological Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruscher, J.B., Hammer, E.Y. and Hammer, E.D. (1996) Forming shared impressions through conversation: An adaptation of the continuum model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (7): 705–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H.J. and Muñiz Jr, A.M. (2006) A tale of tales: Apple Newton narratives. Journal of Strategic Marketing 14 (1): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H.J., Muñiz Jr, A.M. and Arnould, E.J. (2009) How brand communities practices create value. Journal of Marketing 73 (5): 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J.W. and McAlexander, J.H. (1995) Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B. and Hamilton, D.L. (1994) Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (4): 699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokburger-Sauer, N.E. and Hoyer, W.D. (2009) Consumer advisors revisited: What drives those with market mavenism and opinion leadership tendencies and why? Journal of Consumer Behaviour 8 (2/3): 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1974) Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.A. and Sinha, R.K. (2008) Brand communities and new product adoption: The influence and limits of oppositional loyalty. Journal of Marketing 72 (6): 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, G.A., Steinel, W., van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M.A. and Svensson, A. (2007) Group member prototypicality and intergroup negotiation: How one's standing in the group affects negotiation behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology 46 (1): 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, B. and van Knippenberg, D. (2005) Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N. and Wilke, H. (1994) In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology 33 (3): 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varman, R. and Belk, R.W. (2009) Nationalism and ideology in an anticonsumption movement. Journal of Consumer Research 36 (4): 686–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.J., Butt, O.J. and Wei, J. (2011) My identity is my membership: A longitudinal explanation of online brand community members’ behavioral characteristics. Journal of Brand Management 19 (1): 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.C. and Ostrom, A.L. (2006) Complaining to the masses: The role of protest framing in customer-created complaint web sites. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2): 220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1996) The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing 60 (2): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M Hickman.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

Survey instrument

Social Identification Scale (Ellemers et al, 1988) – Seven-point scale: ‘Strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’

  1. 1

    I identify with this group.

  2. 2

    I am glad to belong to this group.

  3. 3

    I feel strong ties to this group.

Prototypicality (Loken and Ward, 1990; Loken and John, 1993) – Seven-point scale: ‘Strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’

  1. 1

    I believe I am very similar as compared to other members of this group.

  2. 2

    I believe I am very typical of other members of this group.

  3. 3

    I believe I am very representative of members of this group.

Stereotype Content Model (Fiske et al, 2002) – Seven-point scale: ‘Not very’ to ‘very’

Competent

  1. 1

    How competent are PC users?

  2. 2

    How confident are PC users?

  3. 3

    How independent are PC users?

Warm

  1. 1

    How warm are PC users?

  2. 2

    How good-natured are PC users?

  3. 3

    How sincere are PC users?

Out-group brand (Brown, 1995) – Seven-point scale: ‘Strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’

  1. 1

    Compared to all companies in the computer industry, I believe PCs are the very best.

  2. 2

    Compared to all companies in the computer industry, I believe PCs are the most reliable.

  3. 3

    Compared to all companies in the computer industry, I believe PCs are the most reputable.

Negative word-of-mouth (Zeithaml et al, 1996) – Seven-point scale: ‘Not very likely’ to ‘very likely’

  1. 1

    How likely are you to say negative things about PCs to people outside of this group?

  2. 2

    How likely are you to recommend avoiding PCs to someone who seeks your advice?

  3. 3

    How likely are you to discourage friends and family from buying a computer from a PC manufacturer?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hickman, T., Ward, J. Implications of brand communities for rival brands: Negative brand ratings, negative stereotyping of their consumers and negative word-of-mouth. J Brand Manag 20, 501–517 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.57

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.57

Keywords

Navigation