Skip to main content
Log in

How personal pronouns influence brand name preference

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I and my brand names, as in iPhone and MySpace, are popular but poorly understood. Although there is an intuitive appeal to using pronouns to reference the consumer, little is known about why the naming tactic works and, in turn, the conditions under which each pronoun should be used. We propose a framework for consumer processing of such brand names, predicting that both I and my influence consumer preference under divergent conditions and psychological mechanisms. In referencing the self as an actor, I should induce narrative self-referencing, wherein one imagines oneself actively using the product. By contrast, my references the self as an owner, so we expect it to give rise to the more inert feeling of subjective ownership. These hypotheses were tested in an online experiment using a representative sample of US consumers. Findings indicate that I produces favorable consumer response via narrative self-referencing, but only when the root word of the brand is a verb (for example, iRead). Meanwhile, my produces favorable consumer response via feelings of subjective ownership, but only when the brand root word is a noun (for example, myReader). Mediation analyses support the proposed divergent psychological processes. Practical implications for branding are discussed, as are theoretical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J.L. (1999) The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (1): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. and Simonson, I. (2003) Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (1): 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggan, J.K. (1992) On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere-ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (2): 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R.W. (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brendl, C.M., Chattopadhyay, A., Pelham, B.W. and Carvallo, M. (2005) Name letter branding: Valence transfers when product specific neeeds are active. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (3): 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D.A. and Wyer, R.S. (2002) The effect of group membership salience on the avoidance of negative outcomes: Implications for social and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (3): 400–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnkrant, R.E. and Unnava, H.R. (1995) Effects of self-referencing on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 22 (1): 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K. and Zeelenberg, M. (2003) Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research 30 (1): 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gaynesford, M. (2006) I: The Meaning of the First Person Term. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, M. and Hofstede, G. (2010) The hofstede model: Applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research. International Journal of Advertising 29 (1): 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debevec, K. and Romeo, J.B. (1992) Self-referent processing in perceptions of verbal and visual commercial information. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 (1): 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J.E. (2004) Imagine yourself in the product: Mental stimulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. Journal of Advertising 33 (2): 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J.E. (2007) Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (4): 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E. and Schreier, M. (2010) The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of Marketing 74 (1): 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourville, J.T. and Soman, D. (2011) The consumer psychology of mail-in rebates. Journal of Product and Brand Management 20 (2): 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.E. and Brock, T.C. (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5): 701–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, I.W. and Wyer, R.S. (2011) Shaping consumer imaginations: The role of self-focused attention in product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 48 (2): 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. (n.d) In Oxford English Dictionary online, http://www.oed.com, accessed 1 December 2010.

  • Jones, D. (2005) iPod, Therefore I Am. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachersky, L. (2011) Do moniker maladies afflict name letter brands? A dual process theory of name letter branding and avoidance effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (3): 642–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • My. (n.d) In Oxford English Dictionary online, http://www.oed.com, accessed 1 December 2010.

  • Peck, J. and Shu, S.B. (2009) The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research 36 (3): 434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. and Dirks, K.T. (2001) Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. and Dirks, K.T. (2003) The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 7 (1): 84–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D. and Hayes, A.F. (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 42 (1): 185–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. and Shaw, R. (1988) Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns. Journal of Personality 56 (2): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reb, J. and Connolly, T. (2007) Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making 2 (2): 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2004) Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (4): 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and Johnson, E.J. (1997) Mere-possession effects without possession in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (1): 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavitt, S. and Brock, T.C. (1986) Self-relevant responses in commercial persuasion. In: K. Sentis and J. Olson (eds.) Advertising and Consumer Psychology. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z., Zhou, A., Han, W. and Liu, P. (2011) Effects of ownership expressed by the first person possessive pronoun. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3): 951–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shomer, R.W. and Centers, R. (1970) Differences in attitudinal responses under conditions of implicitly manipulated group salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15 (2): 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, S.B. and Peck, J. (2011) Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21 (4): 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The First iMac Introduction [video file]. (1998) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BHPtoTctDY, accessed 15 August 2011.

  • Twenge, J.M. and Campbell, W.K. (2009) The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in an Age of Entitlement. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M. (2006) iPod, therefore I am. Vanity Fair April: 146.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Kachersky.

Additional information

Correction

In the original published article the number of participants in Study 2 was incorrectly reported as 243 by the author. This has been corrected to 240 in this final version.

Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Appendix

Appendix

STIMULI – STUDY 1

This product concept was employed for each of the four conditions:

  1. 1

    iRead

  2. 2

    iReader

  3. 3

    myRead

  4. 4

    myReader

iRead

The iRead is a lightweight e-book reader with a full color e-ink display that allows users to easily carry and enjoy their media library. The iRead can store up to 3500 reading materials including magazines, books, newspapers PDFs and blogs. It is complete with built-in wireless capabilities, a large, clear display and touch-screen capabilities to maximize your enjoyment. The iRead includes a voice system, which reads all material aloud - perfect for long trips. Using the iRead is simple and fun!

STIMULI – STUDY 2

This product concept had 3 versions:

  1. 1

    iGame

  2. 2

    myGame

  3. 3

    theGame

iGame

iGame is a revolutionary cross-platform tablet that allows users to play all of their favorite games in one device. iGame features 4G and Wi-Fi connectivity to seamlessly integrate your favorite electronic board games, popular apps and console video games in one sleek device. iGame is built with an organic LED touch screen to provide an extremely realistic gaming experience. iGame is an engaging travel companion. iGame will bring you immersive experiences wherever you go. iGame makes interactive entertainment simple and fun!

This product concept had 3 versions:

  1. 1

    iRun

  2. 2

    myRun

  3. 3

    theRun

iRun

iRun is a lightweight running sneaker with a nano-rubber outsole for steady and swift acceleration. iRun features a lightly padded mesh upper and secure lacing system. iRun is built to speed up your running or walking while providing a safer footstrike than stiffer sneakers. With a supportive honeycomb insole and fine thread construction, iRun is a trustworthy travel companion. iRun will keep you fleet-footed through urban landscapes, across flat plains or hiking up mountains. iRun makes fitness simple and fun!

MEASURES

Subjective ownership*

I feel I have a right to possess iRead.

iRead feels like it should belong to me.

While reading about the product concept, I felt a sense of ownership over the iRead.

Narrative self-referencing**

While reading about the iRead I could easily picture it in use.

I could picture myself using the iRead.

I was mentally involved when reading about the iRead.

While reading the product concept, I had an image of myself reading with the iRead.

* Reb and Connolly (2007); (Cronbach's α=0.80, M=4.28)

** Burnkrant and Unnava (1995); (Cronbach's α=0.88, M=4.36)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kachersky, L., Palermo, N. How personal pronouns influence brand name preference. J Brand Manag 20, 558–570 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.61

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.61

Keywords

Navigation