Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valuing Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This conceptual paper sheds light on some of the major intergovernmental benchmarks, guidelines and principles for corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate governance and sustainability reporting. It reports on several governments’ regulatory roles as their societal governance is intrinsically based on interdependent relationships. There are different actors and drivers who are shaping CSR communications and policies in relational frameworks. This paper mentions some of the countries that have already introduced intelligent substantive and reflexive regulations. It also shows how certain businesses are stepping in with their commitment for sustainability issues as they set their own policies and practices for laudable organisational behaviours. Very often, corporate businesses use non-governmental organisations’ regulatory tools such as process and performance-oriented standards. These regulatory instruments focus on issues such as labour standards, human rights, health and safety, environmental protection, corporate governance and the like. Afterwards, this paper discusses about the relationship between governance and sustainability. It makes reference to some of the relevant European Union Expert Group recommendations for non-financial reporting and CSR audits. Relevant academic contributions are indicating that customers are expecting greater disclosures, accountability and transparency in sustainability reports. This contribution contends that the way forward is to have more proactive governments that raise the profile of CSR. It maintains that CSR communications and stakeholder engagement may bring shared value to business and society. Ultimately, it is in the businesses’ interest to implement corporate sustainability and responsibility and to forge fruitful relationships with key stakeholders, including the regulatory ones, in order to address societal, environmental, governance and economic deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agenda 21 (1992) ‘United Nations sustainable development’, Conference in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 13 June, http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf, accessed 3 January, 2013.

  • Albareda, L., Arenas, D. and Lozano, J. (2009) ‘The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders’, Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (1), 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2009) ‘Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (1), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wagner, M. and Tyteca, D. (2008) ‘Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51 (2), 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R., Hall, A.D., Momentè, F. and Reggiani, F. (2007) ‘What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 76 (2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boll, J. (2005) ‘Corporate social responsibility and welfare state institutions’, http://philpapers.org/rec/BOLIAH, accessed 23 January, 2013.

  • Bondy, K., Moon, J. and Matten, D. (2012) ‘An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications’, Journal of Business Ethics 111(2), 281–299.

  • Carroll, A.B. (1991) ‘The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2004) Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L.J. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in Global Context, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D. (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford Publications, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS) (2013) ‘Corporate responsibility: A government update’, http://bis.ecgroup.net/Publications/BusinessLaw/CorporateGovernance/041112.aspx, accessed 3 February, 2013.

  • European Union (EU) (2007) National Public Policies in the European Union. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Enterprise Publications, Brussels.

  • European Union (EU) (2011) ‘A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility’, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/public-consultation/index_en.htm, accessed 3 February, 2013.

  • European Union (EU) (2012) ‘Sustainable and responsible business European Expert Group on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and SMEs’, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/sme/european-expert-group/index_en.htm, accessed 12 January, 2013.

  • European Union (EU) (2014) ‘Non financial reporting’, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/non-financial_reporting/index_en.htm, accessed 25 June, 2014.

  • Ernst Young (EY) (2013) ‘Corporate social responsibility in India potential to contribute towards inclusive social development Global CSR Summit 2013: An agenda for inclusive growth’, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Government-and-Public-Sector-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India/$File/EY-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India.pdf, accessed 5 May, 2014.

  • Fukukawa, K. and Moon, J. (2004) ‘A Japanese model of corporate social responsibility? A study of website reporting’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 16, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D.U. and Rasche, A. (2007) ‘Discourse ethics and social accountability – The ethics of SA 8000’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 17 (2), 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W.J., Nielsen, A.E., Thomsen, C. and Schultz, F. (2013) ‘CSR communication: Quo vadis?’ Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18 (2), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A. and Moon, J. (2006) ‘Social capital and corporate social responsibility’, The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, 5, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. (2001) ‘Regulating corporate social performance: A new look at corporate social accounting, auditing, and reporting’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 11 (2), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indian Business (IB) (2014) ‘Weekly Economic Bulletin’ – (1 April–7 April) ITP, Division Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, http://indiainbusiness.nic.in/newdesign/upload/Publications/Weekly/April/ITP-Weekly-Economic-Bulletin-1st_April_07_April_2014.pdf, accessed 10 May, 2014.

  • India Companies Act (2013) Insight series – Volume IV corporate social responsibility, https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/taxnewsflash/Documents/india-sept20-2013no4companies.pdf, accessed 12 September, 2013.

  • Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2011) ‘The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting’. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11-100.

  • Jamali, D., Safieddine, A.M. and Rabbath, M. (2008) ‘Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (5), 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesover, F. and Kirkpatrick, G. (2005) ‘The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to non-OECD countries’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13 (2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R.J. and Bansal, P. (2003) ‘Seeing the need for ISO 14001’, Journal of Management Studies, 40 (4), 1047–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjærgaard, A. and Morsing, M. (2012) A Case Study of How Social Media Guidelines are Used to Discipline Employee Behaviour. 5–7 July, European Group of Organizational Studies (EGOS), Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klettner, A., Clarke, T. and Boersma, M. (2014) ‘The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy’, Journal of Business Ethics, 122 (1), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002) ‘The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three europeanization mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research, 41 (2), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger, D. (2001) SA 8000: The Definitive Guide to the New Social Standard, FT Prentice-Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger, D. (2003) The Corporate Responsibility Code Book, Greenleaf, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, X. (1996) Las transformaciones del sector público en las sociedades avanzadas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional. Papers de Formació 23 Diputació de Barcelona.

  • Michelon, G. and Parbonetti, A. (2012) ‘The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure’, Journal of Management and Governance, 16 (3), 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A. (2005) ‘Policy making and the role of government. Realigning business, government and civil society. Emerging embedded relational governance beyond the (neo)liberal and welfare state models’, Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 5 (3), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. and Richardson, J.J. (1985) Unemployment in the UK: Politics and Policies, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. and Sochacki, R. (1996) ‘The social responsibility of business in job and enterprise creation: Motives, means and implications’, Australian Quarterly, 68 (1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M., Dos Santos, V. and Seuring, S. (2009) ‘The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89 (4), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2000) ‘Oceans apart? Comparing business responses to the environment in Europe and North America’, Environment, 42 (9), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2002) ‘Making Rights Real: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability’, From Responsibility to Citizenship: Corporate Accountability for Development, IDS Bulletin 33 (2), Brighton.

  • Nielsen, A.E. and Thomsen, C. (2007) ‘Reporting CSR – What and how to say it?’ Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12 (1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1999) ‘Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Basic Principles of Corporate Governance’, http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3343,en_2649_34813_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html, accessed 2 January, 2013.

  • Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011) ‘Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth’. Harvard Business Review, (January/February), pp. 62–77.

  • Rasche, A. (2007) The Paradoxical Foundation of Strategic Management, Physica/Springer, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2009) ‘Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards – The case of the UN global compact’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16 (4), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. (2010) ‘Collaborative governance 2.0’, Corporate Governance, 10 (4), 500–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A. and Esser, D.E. (2006) ‘From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability – Applying habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research’, Journal of Business Ethics, 65 (3), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., Baur, D., Van Huijstee, M., Ladek, S. and Naidu, J. (2008) ‘Corporations as political actors – A report on the first Swiss master class in corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 80 (2), 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. and Yuthas, K. (2008) ‘Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting’, Journal of Business Ethics, 78 (1–2), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneborn, D. and Trittin, H. (2013) ‘Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18 (2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D., Power, D. and Klassen, R. (2012) ‘When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards’, http://www.springerlink.com/content/gn4kg415544l2516/fulltext.pdf, accessed 3 May, 2013.

  • Stenzel, P.L. (2000) ‘Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulation?’ American Business Law Journal, 37 (2), 237–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005) The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Brookings Institute, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Corporate Communication, University of Malta, Msida, Malta

    Mark Anthony Camilleri

Authors
  1. Mark Anthony Camilleri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camilleri, M. Valuing Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting. Corp Reputation Rev 18, 210–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.9

Keywords

Search

Navigation