Abstract
Students of ‘conventional’ academic disciplines can struggle to determine the extent of their employability. Work-based modules offer a potential solution to this issue. That these type of modules give students the opportunity to apply their knowledge and realise the scope of possible employment opportunities afforded by their degree is commonly accepted, but real issues arise in tackling the assessment of ‘on the job’ experiential learning, particularly in the area of politics. This article outlines an integrated and iterative approach to assessment, starting with the design of the component parts of the module, moving on consider the role played by simple tools such as the framing of key narratives, the development of placement diaries incorporating SWOT analysis and the use of the Politics and International Relations Subject Benchmark Statement. The importance of integrating the module design with the final assessment processes is described, and some examples are offered of how students have described the ways in which the module has enabled them to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and scholarship and employability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashe, F. (2012) ‘Harnessing political theory to facilitate students’ engagement with graduate ‘employability’: A critical pyramid approach’, Politics 32(3): 129–137.
Belton, V., Gould, H.T. and Scott, J.L. (2006) ‘Developing the reflective practitioner–Designing an undergraduate class’, Interfaces 36(2): 150–164.
Conboy, H. and Goldsmith, C. (nd) ‘Narrative and social collaboration in the integration of games in the curriculum’, available at: http://www.teachsos.com/download/game/16_07.pdf, accessed 12 December 2014.
Helms, M. and Nixon, J. (2010) ‘Exploring S.W.O.T. analysis – where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade’, Journal of Strategy and Management 3(3): 215–251.
Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A. (2009) ‘The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning’, Simulation and Gaming 40(3): 297–327.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moon, J.A. (2004) A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice, Abingdon: Routledge.
Reed, J. and Stoltz, P. (2011) Put your Mind-Set to Work. The One Asset you Really Need to Win and Keep the Job you Love, London: Portfolio Penguin.
Sasley, B.E. (2010) ‘Teaching students how to fail: Simulations as tools of explanation’, International Studies Perspectives 11(1): 61–74.
Schon, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2007a) ‘Politics and international relations benchmark’, available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Polictics-and-international-relations.pdf, accessed 12 December 2014.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) ([2007b] 2014) ‘Benchmarking statement for politics and international relations’, available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Politics-and-international-relations.pdf, (original document); http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/SBS-consultation-politics.pdf, (draft document), accessed 12 December 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
statham, a., scullion, j. assessing students’ reflections on work-placed modules. Eur Polit Sci 16, 148–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.103
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.103