Abstract
In this article the role of the state in the internationalization of national prominent universities in a catching-up country is analysed. Taking into account the changes in higher education in the last 60 years, including the changing relationship between the state and the universities, the article takes a longitudinal analytical approach on the importance of state-led science and higher education internationalization initiatives in the integration of Portuguese universities in the global higher education arena. It is found that the state played (and still plays) a critical role in the internationalization process of universities by supporting the build-up of institutional knowledge capacity and by rewarding internationally oriented scholarly activities. Although these public policies did not lead to the emergence of national prominent universities able to compete with global research universities, they allowed for the internationalization and integration of the Portuguese universities in the global higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
NAFSA: http://www.nafsa.org/ [accessed 3 August 2008].
Altbach argues that very few universities can achieve competitive and reputation levels that allow them to be considered as top-tier research universities in the world: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/News33/text003.htm [accessed 5 August 2008].
The Portuguese government is implementing a loan system that aims to financially support tertiary education students in Portugal and enlarging existing student support schemes in order to increase tertiary education participation and the qualifications of the labour force: http://www.mctes.pt/archive/doc/MCTES_emprestimos_1.1.pdf [accessed 26 May 2009].
Another very important event in terms of internationalization of Portuguese universities, which is closely associated to the adhesion of Portugal to the European Union is the participation of Portugal in the Erasmus programme. However, this international mobility programme focuses mainly on the cultural awareness and international life experience of students and not so much on the international knowledge capacity-building of universities. The introduction of the SOCRATES programme in 1995 had a much stronger impact on the internationalization and consolidation of international linkages of academic staff (Bracht et al., 2006).
Portugal is known for its intermediate function in the global system, namely, by bridging the relationship between the European Union core countries and former Portuguese colonies (see Santos, 1993), which represent the group of Portuguese language-spoken countries (e.g. Brazil, Angola and Mozambique among others). Although the Portuguese higher education system is still used as a privileged higher education system by the upper and middle classes in lusophone countries to attain tertiary education (Horta, 2009), the international relationship in terms of research collaboration is rather weak. For example, Brazil is only eighth in a list of 70 countries with which Portuguese scholars collaborate and publish on an international level. Mozambique is 46th and Angola 47th (GPEARI, 2007).
Source: FCT website: http://alfa.fct.mctes.pt/apoios/bolsas/estatisticas/index.phtml.pt [accessed 18 November 2008].
For example, the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation from 1956 to 1996 awarded 2,140 fellowships to be spent abroad, while the Portuguese state, through its science funding agency, attributed 831 scholarships to be spent abroad between 1990 and 1993, 700 of which were Ph.D. scholarships.
Academic ranking of World Universities 2007, http://www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ARWU2007FullListByRank.pdf [accessed 6 August 2008].
The contracts with the US universities have an initial duration of 5 years and an estimated budget of €141 million (see Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.° 132/2006. Diário da República, 1a Série, n° 198, 13 October 2006).
References
Alonso, S. and Maravall, J.M. (2003) ‘Democratizations in the European Periphery’, in J. Hayward and A. Menon (eds.) Governing Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 264–295.
Amaral, A. and Magalhães, A. (2008) ‘Market Competition, Social Accountability and Institutional Strategies’, in A. Vaccaro, H. Horta and P. Madsen (eds.) Transparency, Information and Communication Technology-Social Responsibility and Accountability in Business and Education, Philosophy Documentation Center, pp. 205–226.
Amaral, A. and Teixeira, P. (2000) ‘The rise and fall of the private sector in Portuguese higher education’, Higher Education Policy 13 (3): 245–266.
Banya, C. (2005) ‘Globalization and Higher Education Policy Changes’, in J. Zajda (ed.) International Handbook on Globalization, Education and Policy Research, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 147–164.
Barber, E.G. and Morgan, R.P. (1987) ‘The impact of foreign graduate students on engineering education in the United States’, Science 236 (4797): 33–37.
Barnett, R. (1992) Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care, London: The Open University Press.
Bracht, O., Engel, C., Janson, K., Over, A., Shomburg, H. and Teichler, U. (2006) ‘The professional value of ERASMUS mobility’, Final report presented to the European Commission — DG Education and Culture, November 2006.
Caraça, J. (1993) Do Saber ao Fazer: Porquê Organizar a Ciência, Lisboa: Gradiva.
Chellaraj, G., Maskus, K.E. and Mattoo, A. (2005) ‘The contribution of skilled immigration and international graduate students to US innovation’, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 3588, May 2005.
Cole, J.R. and Cole, S. (1973) Social Stratification in Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Conceição, P. and Heitor, M.V. (2004) Innovation for All? Learning from the Portuguese Path to Technical Change and the Dynamics of Innovation, Westport: Praeger.
Crespo, V. (1993) Uma Universidade para Os Anos 2000 — O Ensino Superior Numa Perspectiva de Futuro, Mem Martins: Editorial Inquérito.
Deem, R., Mok, K.H. and Lucas, L. (2008) ‘Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia’, Higher Education Policy 21 (1): 83–97.
Fairweather, J.S. (1996) Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
FCT. (2005) Evaluation of Research Units 2002–2004 — Overall Report, Lisboa: FCT.
Gago, J.M. (1990) Manifesto para a Ciência em Portugal — ensaio, Viseu: Gradiva.
Gallie, D. and Paugam, S. (2002) Social Precarity and Social Integration, Brussels: European Commission.
GPEARI. (2007) Produção Científica Portuguesa, 1981–2006: Indicadores Bibliométricos, Lisboa: GPEARI.
GPEARI. (2008a) Produção Científica Portuguesa, 1990–2006: Séries Estatísticas, Lisboa: GPEARI.
GPEARI. (2008b) Doutoramentos Realizados ou Reconhecidos por Universidades Portuguesas: 1970 a 2007, Lisboa: GPEARI.
Heitor, M. (2001) Relatório da Avaliação de Unidades de Investigação financiadas pelo programa plurianual — 1999/2000, Lisboa: MCT.
Heitor, M.V. and Horta, H. (2004) ‘Engenharia e desenvolvimento científico’, in J.M.B. Brito, M.V. Heitor and M.F. Rollo (eds.) Momentos de Inovação e Engenharia em Portugal no século XX, Lisboa: D. Quixote, pp. 331–378.
Heitor, M.V., Horta, H. and Conceição, P. (2004) ‘Do Ensino Técnico ao Ensino da Engenharia em Portugal’, in M.V. Heitor, J.M.B. Brito and M.F. Rollo (eds.) Momentos de Inovação e Engenharia em Portugal no século XX, Lisboa: D. Quixote, pp. 241–285.
Henkel, M. (2005) ‘Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment’, Higher Education 49: 155–176.
Horta, H. (2008) ‘On improving the research knowledge base: The Technical University of Lisbon case in perspective’, Higher Education Policy 21 (1): 123–146.
Horta, H. (2009) ‘Global and national prominent universities: Internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the state’, Higher Education 58: 387–409.
Horta, H. and Vaccaro, A. (2008) ‘ICT, Transparency and Proactivity: Finding a Way for Higher Education Institutions to Regain Public Trust’, in A. Vaccaro, H. Horta and P. Madsen (eds.) Transparency, Information and Communication Technology — Social Responsibility and Accountability in Business and Education, Philosophy Documentation Center, pp. 227–240.
Horta, H. and Veloso, F. (2007) ‘Opening the box: comparing EU and US scientific output by scientific field’, Technology Forecasting and Social Change 74 (8): 1334–1356.
Jobbins, D. (2005) ‘Moving to a global stage: a media view’, Higher Education in Europe 30 (2): 137–145.
Jones, P. (1998) ‘Globalization and internationalism: Democratic prospects for world education’, Comparative Education 34 (2): 143–155.
Jongbloed, B. and Koelman, J. (1996) Funding Mechanisms for Higher Education: A Five-country Based Survey with Special Reference to Performance-based Funding Approaches, Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
Kitagawa, F. (2004) ‘Universities and the learning regions: Creation of knowledge and social capital in the learning society’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 36 (1): 9–28.
Kwiek, M. (2005) ‘The university and the state in a global age: renegotiating the traditional social contract?’ European Educational Research Journal 4 (4): 324–342.
Leadbeater, C. (2000) Living on Thin Air: The New Economy, London: Penguin.
Litjens, J. (2005) ‘The Europeanization of higher education in the Netherlands’, European Educational Research Journal 4 (3): 208–218.
Lombardi, J.V., Craig, D.D., Capaldi, E.D., Gater, D.S. and Mendonça, S.L. (2001) ‘Quality engines: the competitive context for research universities’, Annual report from the Lombardi Programme on Measuring University Performance, July 2001.
Maassen, P. and Olsen, J.P. (eds.) (2007) University Dynamics and European Integration, Dordrecht: Springer.
Magone, J.M. (2003) The Politics of Southern Europe. Integration into the European Union, Westport: Praeger.
Marginson, S. (1997) ‘Steering from a distance: Power relations in Australian higher education’, Higher Education 34: 63–80.
Marginson, S. (2006) ‘Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education’, Higher Education 52: 1–39.
McGuiness, A.C. (2002) Linking Strategic Planning and Budgeting and Organizing for Change, Boulder: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
Merton, R.K. (1968) ‘The Matthew effect in science’, Science 159: 56–63.
Mok, K.-H. and Tan, J. (2004) Globalization and Marketization in Education: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong and Singapore, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Mowery, D.C. and Rosenberg, N. (1998) Paths of Innovation — Technological Change in 20th Century America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neave, G. (1996) ‘Homogeneization, Integration and Convergence: The Cheshire Cats of Higher Education Analysis’, in V.L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen and R. Rinne (eds.) The Mockers and the Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education, London: Pergamon Press, pp. 26–41.
Niklasson, L. (1996) ‘Quasi-markets in higher education — a comparative analysis’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 18 (1): 7–22.
Oba, J. (2007) ‘Incorporation of national universities in Japan’, Asia Pacific Journal of Education 27 (3): 291–303.
OCES. (2003) Bolsas atribuídas ao abrigo do Programa CIENCIA (1990–1993), Lisboa: OCES.
Price, D. (1963) Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
Reskin, B.F. (1977) ‘Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science’, American Sociological Review 42 (3): 491–504.
Rondinelli, D.A. (2003) ‘Promoting National Competitiveness in a Globalizing Economy: The State's Changing Roles’, in D.A. Rondinelli and G.S. Cheema (eds.) Reinventing Government for the Twenty-first Century, State Capacity in a Globalizing Society, Bloomfield: Kumarian Press, pp. 33–59.
Rosenberg, N. (2002) ‘Knowledge and Innovation for Economic Development: Should Universities be Economic Institutions?’, in P. Conceição, D.V. Gibson, M.V. Heitor, G. Sirilli and F. Veloso (eds.) Knowledge for Inclusive Development, Westport: Quorum, pp. 35–48.
Rosovsky, H. (1990) The University — An Owner's Manual, London: W.W.Norton.
Ruivo, B. (1995) As Políticas de Ciência e Tecnologia e o Sistema de Investigacão, Lisboa: INCM.
Santos, B.S. (1993) Portugal: Um Retrato Singular, Porto: Afrontamento.
Santos, B.S. and Nunes, J.A. (2004) ‘Introduction: democracy, participation and grassroots movement in contemporary Portugal’, Southern European Society and Politics 9 (2): 1–15.
Shattock, M. (2003) Managing Successful Universities, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Teixeira, P., Rosa, M.J. and Amaral, A. (2004) ‘Is There a Higher Education Market in Portugal?’, in P. Teixeira, D. Dill, A. Amaral and B. Jongbloed (eds.) Markets in Higher Education, Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 291–310.
Tiits, M. (2003) ‘Towards modern STI policy-marking in Estonia’, TRAMES 7 (57/52): 53–62.
Trow, M. (1999) ‘From mass higher education to universal access: the American advantage’, Minerva 37: 303–328.
Vaira, M. (2004) ‘Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis’, Higher Education 48: 483–510.
van Dijk, J. (1999) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
van Raan, A.F.J. (2005) ‘Fatal attraction: Ranking of universities by bibliometric methods’, Scientometrics 62 (1): 133–143.
van Vught, F. (ed.) (1989) Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Veiga, A. and Amaral, A. (2008) ‘How Does the Bologna Process Challenge the National Traditions of Higher Education Institutions?’, in J. Valimaa and O.-H. Ylojoki (eds.) Cultural Perspectives on Higher Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 238–256.
Yonezawa, A. (2007) ‘Japanese flagship universities at a crossroads’, Higher Education 54 (4): 483–499.
Zaharia, S. and Gibert, E. (2005) ‘The entrepreneurial university in the knowledge society’, Higher Education in Europe 30 (1): 31–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horta, H. The Role of the State in the Internationalization of Universities in Catching-up Countries: An Analysis of the Portuguese Higher Education System. High Educ Policy 23, 63–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.20
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.20