Skip to main content
Log in

Fabrications, Time-Consuming Bureaucracy and Moral Dilemmas — Finnish University Employees’ Experiences on the Governance of University Work

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores how the university workers of two Finnish universities experienced the range of neoliberal policymaking and governance reforms implemented in the 2000s. These reforms include quality assurance, system of defined annual working hours, outcome-based salary system and work time allocation system. Our point of view regarding these practices is based on the ideas of the governmentality research tradition, which means that they can be seen as technologies through which the ideology, values and aims of the neoliberal policy are carried out in every day work at university. This article draws on a survey that is based on open-ended questions concerning those managerial techniques. These experiences can be summarised into three themes from the perspective of performativity culture: techniques that confirm a culture of fabrication, moral dilemmas and increase in the new type of bureaucracy in their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I.R. and Elander, C. (2009) ‘Brave new world: Higher education reform in Finland’, Higher Education Management and Policy 21 (2): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (2006) ‘Carving out time and space in the managerial university’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 19 (5): 578–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (2003) ‘The teachers’ soul and terrors of performativity’, Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (2006) ‘Performativity and Fabrications in the Education Economy: Towards the Performativity Society’, in H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.-A. Dillabough and A.H. Halsey (eds.) Education, Globalisation & Social Change, Oxford: University Press, pp. 692–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (2012) Global Education. New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansel, P. and Davies, B. (2010) ‘Through a Love of What Neoliberalism Puts at Risk’, in J. Blackmore, M. Brennan and L. Zipin (eds.) Re-Positioning University Governance and Academic Work, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennich-Björkman, L. (2007) ‘Has academic freedom survived? — An interview study of the conditions for researchers in an era of paradigmatic change’, Higher Education Quarterly 61 (3): 334–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., Brennan, M. and Zipin, L. (eds.) (2010) ‘Repositioning University Governance and Academic Work: On Overview’, in Re-Positioning University Governance and Academic Work, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L. (2012) ‘Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: Quantitative performance measures in the Australian research quality framework’, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (January): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J., Barry, J. and Clark, H. (2002) ‘Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management’, Human Relations 55 (9): 1051–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2003) ‘Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of “evidence based practice”’, Gender and Education 15 (1): 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. and Bansel, P. (2010) ‘Governmentality and academic work. Shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers’, Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 26 (3): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn, Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001) ‘Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important?’ Comparative Education 37 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2009) ‘“Managing” Academic Research in Universities or Cat-Herding for Beginners?’ in M. Simons, M. Olssen and M. Peters (eds.) Re-Reading Education Polices. A Handbook Studying in Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, C. and Morris, J. (2003) ‘The “neo-bureaucratic” state: Professionals, managers and professional managers in schools, general practices and social work’, Organization 10 (1): 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000) ‘The Subject of Power’, in J.D. Faubion (ed.) Michel Foucault. Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. 3 London: Penguin Books, pp. 326–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, D. (2008) ‘Developing governmentality: Conduct and education policy’, Journal of Education Policy 23 (4): 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2002) ‘The end of quality?’ Quality in Higher Education 8 (1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2005) ‘Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment’, Higher Education 49 (1–2): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, V. (2004) ‘Perverse pleasures — Identity work and the paradoxes of greedy institutions’, Journal of International Women’s Studies 5 (3): 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoecht, A. (2006) ‘Quality assurance in UK higher education: Issues of trust, control, professional autonomy and accountability’, Higher Education 51 (4): 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höpfl, H. (2006) ‘Post-bureaucracy and Weber’s “modern” bureaucrat’, Journal of Organizational Change Management 19 (1): 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornibrook, S. (2012) ‘Policy implementation and academic workload planning in the managerial university: Understanding unintended consequences’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (1): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhiainen, A., Jauhiainen, A. and Laiho, A. (2009) ‘The dilemmas of the “efficiency university” policy and the everyday life of university teachers’, Teaching in Higher Education 14 (4): 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekäle, J. (2008) ‘The negotiation process toward the new salary system in the Finnish university sector’, Higher Education Management and Policy 20 (3): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivistö, J. (2005) ‘The government-higher education institution relationship: Theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory’, Tertiary Education and Management 11 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, H.-M. (2009) ‘Understanding relationships between academic staff and administrators: An organisational culture perspective’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laiho, A. and Jauhiainen, A. (2012) ‘Kohti post-Humboldtilaista yliopistoa — opetus-tutkimus yhteys uusliberalistisessa yliopistossa. [Towards Post-Humboldtian University — Teaching-research Relationship in Neoliberal University]’, in J. Kivirauma, A. Jauhiainen, P. Seppänen and T. Kaunisto (eds.) Koulutuksen yhteiskunnallinen ymmärrys [Social Understanding of the Education]. Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura, Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 59, Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in educational sciences, pp. 62–88.

  • Larner, W. (2000) ‘Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality’, Studies in Political Economy 63 (Autumn): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntylä, H. (2007) ‘On “good” academic work. Practicing respect at close range’, Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics.

  • Morley, L. (2003) Quality and Power in Higher Education, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J., Marks, A., Rowland, S. and Walker, M. (2001) ‘Towards a new academic professionalism: A manifesto of hope’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (2): 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. and Peters, M.A. (2005) ‘Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism’, Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opetus — ja kulttuuriministeriö [Ministry of Education and Culture] (2012) Yliopistolakiuudistuksen vaikutusten arviointi [Evaluation of the Effects of the New Universities Act], Helsinki: Opetus — ja kulttuuriministeriö, Opetus — ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja.

  • Power, M. (2000) ‘The audit society — Second thoughts’, International Journal of Auditing 4 (1): 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2003) ‘Evaluating the audit explosion’, Law and Policy 25 (3): 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, K. (2008) ‘Meaningful academic work as praxis in emergence’, Journal of Research Practice 4(1), ArticleP1, http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/78/102, accessed 27 August 2012.

  • Rinne, R. (2010) ‘The Nordic University Model from a Comparative and Historical Perspective’, in J. Kauko, R. Rinne and H. Kynkäänniemi (eds.) Restructuring the Truth of Schooling — Essays on Discursive Practices in Sociology and the Politics of Education, Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in educational sciences, pp. 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R. and Jauhiainen, A. (2012) ‘In the Shifting Sands of Policy — University Academics‘ and Employees’ Views and Experiences of Finnish New Higher Education Policy’, in S. Ahola and D.M. Hoffman (eds.) Higher Education Research in Finland. Emerging Structures and Contemporary Issues, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Finnish Institute for Educational Research, pp. 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R., Jauhiainen, A., Simola, H., Lehto, R., Jauhiainen, A. and Laiho, A. (2012) Valta, uusi yliopistopolitiikka ja yliopistotyö Suomessa. Managerialistinen hallintapolitiikka yliopistolaisten kokemana [Power, New Higher Education Policy and University Work in Finland. Managerial Governmentality Experienced by University Workers], Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association, Research in educational sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R., Kallo, J. and Hokka, S. (2004) ‘Too eager to comply? OECD education policies ant thee Finnish response’, European Educational Research Journal 3 (2): 454–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F. and Lingard, B. (2010) Globalizing Education Policy, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1991) ‘Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy’, Accounting Organizations and Society 16 (7): 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, A. (2003) ‘New Public Management and Finnish Public Sector Organisations: The Case of Universities’, in A. Amaral, V. Meek and I. Larsen (eds.) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business, pp. 55–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simola, H. (2009) ‘Trans-national technologies, national techniques and local mechanisms in finnish university governance: A journey through the layers’, Nordic Educational Research 29 (1): 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieteentekijöiden liitto ja professoriliitto [The Finnish Union of University Researchers and Teachers and The Finnish Union of University Professors] (2010) Yliopistouudistusta koskeva kysely [Inquiry concerning the university reform], http://www.tieteentekijoidenliitto.fi/news/578, accessed 6 June 2013.

  • Tjeldvoll, A. (2011) ‘Change leadership in universities: The Confucian dimension’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33 (3): 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Universities Act (1997) 27 March 1997/645.

  • Universities Act (2009) 24 July 2009/558.

  • Vanttaja, M. (2010) Yliopiston villit vuodet. Suomalaisen yliopistolaitoksen muutoksia ja uudistuksia 1990-luvulta 2000-luvun alkuun [The Wild Years of the University. Changes and Reforms of the Finnish University Institution from 1990’s to Beginning of the 2000’s], Turku: Turun yliopiston kasvatustieteiden tiedekunnan julkaisuja.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (2010) ‘Academic manager or managed academics? Academic identity schisms in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31 (3): 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O.-H. and Mäntylä, H. (2003) ‘Conflicting time perspectives in academic work’, Time & Society 12 (1): 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O.-H. and Ursin, J. (2013) ‘The construction of academic identity in the changes of finnish higher education’, Studies in Higher Education 38 (8): 1145–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jauhiainen, A., Jauhiainen, A., Laiho, A. et al. Fabrications, Time-Consuming Bureaucracy and Moral Dilemmas — Finnish University Employees’ Experiences on the Governance of University Work. High Educ Policy 28, 393–410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.18

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.18

Keywords

Navigation