Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining Variation in the Use of NTBs in Developed Countries: The Role of Political Institutions

  • Trade and Political Institutions
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the much-touted celebration of the successes of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization in liberalizing free trade, these successes have been limited due to the increasing use of non-tariff barriers (NTBs) as a form of ‘protectionism in disguise.’ Among advanced industrial economies, the use of NTBs varies considerably. The purpose of this paper is to explain what accounts for this variation. We locate the issue of international trade in its appropriate theoretical context — as a two-level game in which politicians simultaneously face pressure at the international level to fulfill commitments to international free trade agreements, and domestic pressures for protectionist relief. We conduct a statistical analysis using a simple, multivariate regression model examining data at three points in time, 1988, 1993, and1996, to highlight the causes of the rise in NTBs and variation in their usage. We hypothesize that PR-based systems are associated with lower rather than higher levels of NTBs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term ‘non-tariff barriers’ to trade include measures other than tariffs that may be used by countries to restrict imports. For the purposes of this study, we use the definition of NTBs employed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) database (OECD, 1996, 63).

References

  • Bergsten, C.F. and Cline, W.R. (1983) Trade Policy in the 1980s, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, M.L. and Reinhardt, E. (1999) ‘Industrial Location and Protection: The Political and Economic Geography of U.S. Non Tariff Barriers’, American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1028–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowhey, P.F. (1993) ‘Domestic Institutions and the Credibility of International Commitments: Japan and the United States’, International Organization 47 (2): 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crepaz, M. (1992) ‘Corporatism in Decline? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Corporatism on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes in 18 Industrialized Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 25: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorf, A.V. and Stern, R.M. (1998) Measurement of Nontariff Barriers, Michigan, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P., Jacobson, H. and Putnam, R. (1993) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D. (1980) Protectionism Again…?: Causes and Consequences of a Retreat from Freer Trade to Economic Nationalism, London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, A. (1998) Political Ideologies, London: Macmillan Press Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, E., Ragin, C. and Stephens, J.D. (1997) ‘The Welfare State in Comparative Perspective: Determinants, Program Characteristics and Outcome’, Comparative Welfare Dataset. Northwestern University and University of North Carolina.

  • Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1978) Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, Wisconsin: Wisconsin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. and Milner, H. (eds.) (1996) Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leaner, E.E. (1990) ‘The Structure and Effects of Tariff and Non-tariff Barriers in 1983’, in Ronald W. Jones and Anne O. Krueger (eds.) The Political Economy of International Trade, New York: Basil Blackwell, pp. 224–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. and Crepaz, M. (1991) ‘Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in 18 Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages’, British Journal of Political Science 21: 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E.D. and Busch, M.L. (1995) ‘The Political Economy of Nontariff Barriers: A Cross Sectional Analysis’, International Organization 49 (4): 723–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. (1997) Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1996) Indicators of Tariff and Non-tariff Barriers, Paris: OECD.

  • Putnam, R.D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The logic of Two-level Games’, International Organization 42: 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, E.J. (1981) ‘The Determinants of Tariff and Nontariff Trade Restriction in the US’, The Journal of Political Economy 89 (1): 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, R. (1987) ‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’, International Organization 41: 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaperlanda, A. (1973) Prospects for Eliminating Non-tariff distortions, Nevada: A.W Sijthoff International Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siaroff, A. (1999) ‘Corporatism in Twenty-Four Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement’, European Journal of Political Research 36: 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takacs, W. (1981) ‘Pressure for Protectionism: An Empirical Analysis’, Economic Inquiry 19: 687–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winham, G.R. (1986) International Trade and Tokyo Round Negotiations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyotika Saksena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saksena, J., Anderson, L. Explaining Variation in the Use of NTBs in Developed Countries: The Role of Political Institutions. Int Polit 45, 475–496 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.20

Keywords

Navigation