Skip to main content
Log in

Are the log-returns of Italian open-end mutual funds normally distributed? A risk assessment perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we conduct an empirical analysis of daily log-returns of Italian open-end mutual funds and their respective benchmarks in the period from February 2007 to May 2015. First, we estimate the classical normal-based model on the log-returns of a large set of funds. Then we compare it with five models allowing for asymmetry and (or) heavy tails. We empirically assess that both the value at risk and the average value at risk are model-dependent and we show that the difference between models should be taken into consideration in the evaluation of risk measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Italy open-end mutual funds are established and managed by asset management companies supervised by the Bank of Italy in cooperation with the Companies and Stock Exchange Commission. In particular, the Bank of Italy receives supervisory and statistical reports regarding all the funds established by Italian management companies (for more detailed information on the characteristics of these data see Banca d’Italia, 2015b).

  2. The percentage difference %Δ of b with respect to a is defined as %Δ=1−b/a.

References

  • Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1974) Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banca d’Italia (2015a) Regolamento sulla gestione collettiva del risparmio, Circolari e regolamenti di vigilanza, http://www.bancaditalia.it/compiti/vigilanza/normativa/archivio-norme/regolamenti/20120508/REG-19GEN2015.pdf, accessed 3 September 2015.

  • Banca d’Italia (2015b) Manuale delle segnalazioni statistiche e di vigilanza per gli organismi di investimento collettivo del risparmio, Circolari e regolamenti di vigilanza, http://www.bancaditalia.it/compiti/vigilanza/normativa/archivio-norme/circolari/c189/CIRC189_integrale_16agg.pdf, accessed 3 September 2015.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Fundamental review of the trading book – consultative document, http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs219.htm, accessed 3 September 2015.

  • Bianchi, M.L. and Miele, M.G. (2011) I fondi comuni aperti in Italia: performance delle societá di gestione del risparmio. Rome, IT: Banca d’Italia. Working Paper no. 795.

  • Bianchi, M.L., Rachev, S.T., Kim, Y.S. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2010a) Tempered stable distributions and processes in finance: Numerical analysis. In: M. Corazza and C. Pizzi (eds.) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance, Milan, Italy: Springer-Verlag Italia, pp. 33–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, M.L., Rachev, S.T., Kim, Y.S. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2010b) Tempered infinitely divisible distributions and processes. SIAM Theory of Probability and Its Applications 55 (1): 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, M.L., Rachev, S.T. and Fabozzi, F.J. (forthcoming) Tempered stable Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes: A practical view. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation. in press, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03610918.2014.966834.

  • Bianchi, M.L., Tassinari, G.L. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2015b) Riding with the four horsemen and the multivariate normal tempered stable model. (mimeo).

  • Cesari, R. and Panetta, F. (2002) The performance of Italian equity funds. Journal of Banking and Finance 26 (1): 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P. (2010) Backtesting. In: R. Cont (ed.) Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltori, F. (2010) I fondi comuni italiani: imitazioni domestiche di modelli esteri alla prova della globalizzazione finanziaria. In: F. Boffa and G. Galeazzi (eds.) Evoluzione e discontinuità nel sistema finanziario internazionale, Milan, Italy: McGraw-Hill Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokov, S., Stoyanov, S.V. and Rachev, S.T. (2008) Computing VaR and AVaR of skewed-t distribution. Journal of Applied Functional Analysis 3: 189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Securities and Markets Authority (2010) CESR’s guidelines on risk measurement and the calculation of global exposure and counterparty risk for UCITS, http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/10_788.pdf, accessed 3 September 2015.

  • Gil, A., Segura, J. and Temme, N.M. (2007) Numerical Methods for Special Functions, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harmantzis, F.C., Miao, L. and Chien, Y. (2006) Empirical study of value-at-risk and expected shortfall models with heavy tails. The Journal of Risk Finance 7 (2): 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W. (2005) Calibration of multivariate generalized hyperbolic distributions using the EM algorithm, with applications in risk management, portfolio optimization and portfolio credit risk. PhD thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

  • Isogai, T. (2014) Benchmarking of Unconditional VaR and ES Calculation Methods: A Comparative Simulation Analysis with Truncated Stable Distribution, Tokyo, Japan: Bank of Japan, no. 14-E-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.S., Rachev, S.T., Bianchi, M.L. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2010) Computing VaR and AVaR in infinitely divisible distributions. Probability and Mathematical Statistics 30 (2): 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.S., Rachev, S.T., Bianchi, M.L., Mitov, I. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2011) Time series analysis for financial market meltdowns. Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (8): 1879–1891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.S., Giacometti, R., Rachev, S.T., Fabozzi, F.J. and Mignacca, D. (2012) Measuring financial risk and portfolio optimization with a non-Gaussian multivariate model. Annals of Operations Research 201 (1): 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinelli, C., D’Addona, S. and Rachev, S.T. (2007) A comparison of some univariate models for value-at-risk and expected shortfall. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 10 (6): 1043–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P. (2005) Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediobanca (2014) Indagine annuale su fondi e Sicav di diritto italiano. Ufficio studi, http://www.mbres.it/, accessed 3 September 2015.

  • Misiorek, A. and Weron, R. (2012) Heavy-tailed distributions in VaR calculations. In: J.E. Gentle, W.K. Härdle and Y. Mori (eds.) Handbook of Computational Statistics, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 1025–1059.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rachev, S.T., Stoyanov, S.V. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2008) Advanced Stochastic Models, Risk Assessment, and Portfolio Optimization: The Ideal Risk, Uncertainty, and Performance Measures, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachev, S.T., Kim, Y.S., Bianchi, M.L. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2011) Financial Models with Lévy Processes and Volatility Clustering, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosiński, J. (2007) Tempering stable processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 117 (6): 677–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, M., Rachev, S.T., Kim, Y.S. and Fabozzi, F.J. (2012) Approximation of skewed and leptokurtic return distributions. Applied Financial Economics 22 (16): 1305–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, S.V. and Racheva-Iotova, B. (2004) Numerical methods for stable modeling in financial risk management. In: S.T. Rachev (ed.) Handbook of Computational and Numerical Methods in Finance, Reinach, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, pp. 299–329.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to M. Carofiglio, D. Dichter, G. Ferrero, C. Gola, L.F. Signorini, L. Zucchelli for their comments and suggestions on a previous version of this article. The author also gratefully acknowledges two anonymous referees for their help in improving the article. The views expressed in the article are those of the author and do not involve the responsibility of the Bank of Italy. The author bears the sole responsibility for the contents of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

1has been working since 2008 at the Banca d’Italia and he is currently a researcher/supervisor in the Macroprudential Analysis Division of the Regulation and Macroprudential Analysis Directorate. He holds a degree in Mathematics from the University of Pisa (2005) and a PhD in Computational methods for economic and financial decisions and forecasting from the University of Bergamo (2009). He has published a book and several articles on quantitative finance, financial econometrics, probability theory and non-linear optimization, and he has taught university and professional courses in quantitative finance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonardo Bianchi, M. Are the log-returns of Italian open-end mutual funds normally distributed? A risk assessment perspective. J Asset Manag 16, 437–449 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.30

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.30

Keywords

Navigation