Skip to main content
Log in

Preferred leadership prototypes of male and female leaders in 27 countries

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study shows that preferred leadership prototypes held by female leaders differ from the prototypes held by male leaders, and that these prototype differences vary across countries, cultures, and especially industries. In general, female managers prefer participative, team oriented, and charismatic leadership prototype dimensions more than males. Contrary to popular belief, both males and females valued humane-oriented leadership equally. Gender egalitarianism and industry type were important moderators of the gender–leadership prototype relationship. Gender egalitarianism increased females' desire for participative leadership, while prototype differences between genders were magnified in the finance and food industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The GLOBE sample of male and female managers reported on page 384 in House et al. (2004: 384) was incorrect, and based on a misinterpretation of sample data. We corrected this misinterpretation in the present study.

References

  • Avolio, B. J. 2007. Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory building. American Psychologist, 62 (1): 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayman, R. 1993. Leadership perception: The role of gender and culture. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions: 137–166. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. 2004. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7 (4): 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booysen, L. A. E., & van Wyk, M. W. 2007. Culture and leadership in South Africa. In J. S. Chhokar, F. C. Brodbeck, & R. J. House (Eds), Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies: 433–474. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caligiuri, P. M., & Tung, R. L. 1999. Comparing the success of male and female expatriates from a US-based multinational company. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10 (5): 763–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. (Eds) 2007. Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & Brodbeck, F. C. 2004. Leadership prototypes and cultural variation: The identification of culturally endorsed implicit theories of leadership. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies: 10–22. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. 1988. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. In R. N. Farmer & E. G. McGoun (Eds), Advances in international comparative management, Vol. 3: 127–150. London: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. 2007. Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. 2003a. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6): 807–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. 2003b. Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6): 851–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. 2008. Leadership style matters: The small, but important, style differences between male and female leaders. In D. Bilmoria & S. K. Piderit (Eds), Handbook of women in business and management: 279–303. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129 : 569–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R., & Padavic, I. 2007. A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32 (4): 1121–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francesco, A. M., & Gold, B. A. 2005. International organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, M., & Tiggemann, M. 1999. Gender differences in leadership style, job stress, and mental health in male- and female-dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72 (3): 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. 1994. Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership Quarterly, 5 (2): 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G. G. 1991. Industry determinants of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2): 396–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (4): 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., Harris, D., & Wolfson, P. J. 2006. The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of US corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20 (4): 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. P., & Costley, D. L. 2006. Understanding behaviors for effective leadership, (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2003. Yearbook of labour statistics, Table 2C. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

  • Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Sully de Luque, M. 2006. Culture and leadership: An overview of the findings of the GLOBE project, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta.

  • Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, J. R. 2008. The strong sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106 (1): 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. 1996. Male–female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51 (2): 157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R. G. 1986. Notes on the practical and theoretical consequences of implicit leadership theories for the future of leadership measurement. Journal of Management, 12 (1): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. 2007. Women in management: Reflections and projections. Women in Management Review, 22 (1): 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. 1993. The contingency model in cross-cultural perspective. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions: 137–166. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L. 2004. Female expatriates: The model global manager? Organizational Dynamics, 33 (3): 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L. 2008. Do race and gender matter in international assignments to/from Asia Pacific? An exploratory study of attitudes among Chinese Human Resource Management, 47 (1): 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma, A., & Stroh, L. K. 2001. Different perspectives on selection for international assignments: The impact of LMX and gender. Cross Cultural Management, 8 (3/4): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. 2002. Leadership and gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 13 (6): 643–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. 2003. In search of gender advantage. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (6): 835–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. 1990. Measuring sex stereotypes: A multinational study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. 2006. Leadership in organizations, (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori D Paris.

Additional information

Accepted by Rosalie Tung, Area Editor, 19 August 2008. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paris, L., Howell, J., Dorfman, P. et al. Preferred leadership prototypes of male and female leaders in 27 countries. J Int Bus Stud 40, 1396–1405 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.114

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.114

Keywords

Navigation