Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences

  • Retrospective
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My 2001 article provided a critical review of one of the most popular constructs in international business, and in the management and business literature as a whole, namely cultural distance. It listed various illusions, implicit yet unsubstantiated and refutable assumptions that underpinned a construct set to capture the essence of cultural differences. The paper questioned the validity of the measure; the resultant findings obtained in such international business applications as foreign direct investment patterns, sequence, entry mode, and performance; and, ultimately, the wisdom of continuing the use of the measure and its underlying construct. In this retrospective, I review subsequent work that tested some of the original observations, the impact the article has had, and, in particular, how we can redirect research away from the static cultural distance paradigm toward the dynamic interaction of the actual entities that come into contact in international business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (2): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H. et al. 2004. Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (5): 548–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D., Shenkar, O., Shoham, A., & Siskocick, I. 2008. National culture and expatriate deployment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (8): 1293–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. 2001. Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (1): 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kim, K., Farh, C. I. C., & Tangirala, S. 2010. When does cross-cultural motivation enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support and cultural distance. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (5): 1110–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning's thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction costs explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4 (2): 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. 2006. Cross-cultural organizational psychology. Annual Review of Sociology, 58: 479–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. -E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. -E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (9): 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. 2006. A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (3): 285–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. 1994. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2): 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. -H., Shenkar, O., & Li, J. 2008. Cultural distance, investment flow, and control in cross-border cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (10): 1117–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Shenkar, O. 2011. Toward a perspective of cultural friction in international business. Journal of International Management, 17 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, R. J., & Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutional exceptions on global projects: A process model. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 562–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Ungson, G. 1997. The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (2): 279–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C., & Park, S. H. 2002. National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmer, J., Chiu, R., & Shenkar, O. 2007. Cultural distance asymmetry in expatriate adjustment. Cross Cultural Management, 14 (2): 150–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O., & Arikan, I. 2009. Business as international politics: Drawing insights from nation-state to inter-firm alliances. Business and Politics, 11 (4): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O., & Zeira, Y. 1992. Role conflict and role ambiguity of chief executive officers in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1): 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O., Luo, Y., & Yeheskel, O. 2008. From “distance” to “friction”: Substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 905–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Thomas, D. C. 2008. Introduction. In P. B. Smith, M. F. Peterson, & D. C. Thomas (Eds), The handbook of cross-cultural management research: 3–14. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Usunier, J. 1998. International and cross-cultural management research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Ohio, Columbus, USA

    Oded Shenkar

Authors
  1. Oded Shenkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Accepted by John Cantwell, Editor-in-Chief, 30 August 2011. This paper has been with the author for one revision.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shenkar, O. Beyond cultural distance: Switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. J Int Bus Stud 43, 12–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.42

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.42

Keywords

Search

Navigation