Skip to main content
Log in

International organisations and policy diffusion: the global norm of lifelong learning

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyses the role of international organisations in global policy diffusion, drawing on the example of lifelong learning, a currently widely appreciated concept in education policy. I explain this success based on a sociological institutionalist framework, arguing that lifelong learning has become a global norm in education policy. For this purpose, I conduct a quantitative study of 99 countries from 1996 to 2004, showing how the idea of lifelong learning has been disseminated by international organisations and how states have reacted to this development. I first outline the theoretical framework, highlighting in particular the crucial role of international organisations. In a further step, I present the data and methods. In the third part, I analyse the activities of several international organisations on lifelong learning. In the fourth step, I show how lifelong learning has spread, distinguishing the idea of lifelong learning and reforms linked to it. Fifth, as the quantitative analysis shows, international organisations like the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Union can explain a large part of dissemination when it comes to the idea of lifelong learning, but reforms are more dependent on national preconditions like the wealth of a country. In the conclusions, I sum up the article's main findings and outline further research areas linked to global diffusion processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other important causes for lifelong learning diffusion would be herding effects or the emulation of countries in their neighbours’ policies (Berry and Berry 2007). From this point of view, countries in a particular region would be more likely to adopt lifelong learning policies than others. Subsequent analyses will also account for this factor, but given the idea of a global policy of lifelong learning, I do not further test this assumption as a single hypothesis.

  2. Temporarily restricted data should not lead to the fact that only long-running diffusion processes are examined. Given that the focus of diffusion studies is on the process, and that globalisation and internationalisation processes are likely to result in more and different diffusion patterns (compare Jahn 2006: 406–7), a short time period of available data represents a methodological challenge that needs to be tackled.

  3. Since data were derived from UNESCO sources, it was not possible to establish variation with regard to UNESCO contacts. Therefore the effects of this organisation are not assessed quantitatively. Detailed calculations and further details of the methodology can be found in Jakobi (2009a, 2006).

  4. Categories are ‘Low Income’, ‘Lower Middle Income’, ‘Upper Middle Income’ and ‘High Income’, based on a World Bank classification.

  5. The metric values have been recalculated as categories of ‘service economy’, following a principle of approximately the same size on any category in the data set. This classification results in a ‘Low Service Economy’ represented by a share of services of up to 48 per cent of the GDP, a ‘Medium Service Economy’ with 49–62 per cent and a ‘High Service Economy’ with a share of more than 62 per cent.

  6. According to these categories the geographical dispersion of the data is as follows: Sub-Saharan Africa (Botswana, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Namibia, Nigeria, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe), Asia and Oceania (Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, North Korea, India, Indonesia, Iran, Japan, Malaysia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippines, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand), Central Europe and former USSR (Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Poland, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, The Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia, Ukraine), Latin America and Caribbean (Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Guyana, Jamaica, Mexico, Peru, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago), Middle East and North Africa (Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Malta, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen), North America (Canada, United States of America), Western Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, United Kingdom).

  7. So far, case-based evidence from related research suggests that lifelong learning ideas and reforms are adopted by democracies as well as non-democracies, for example in Myanmar, China and Zimbabwe (Jakobi 2009a).

  8. Table 2 represents such an approach, assessing the spread independently for different points in time.

  9. Other variables (e.g. GNI per capita) have been recalculated to a mean value for these 8 years; special attention has been paid to whether large changes have occurred that could influence results.

  10. See Jahn (2006: 410–11, 415) for a discussion of these variables. See Holzinger et al. (2008) for assessing the effects of transnational communication with a long-term and more detailed, but geographically restricted database.

  11. Assessing UNESCO influence is thus not possible, since no variance would exist on the side of the independent variable: All countries in the data set have close contact to UNESCO, since this contact is where the original data come from.

  12. Logistic regression analysis is based on odds and iterations. Therefore, its R2 measures are not strictly comparable to the R2 of a linear regression analysis.

  13. Cox-and-Snell-R2 is per definition less than 1 (Backhaus et al. 2003: 441). The estimations of variance based on Nagelkerke-R2 presented are thus slightly higher than results based on McFadden-R2 would be. However, literature tends to use McFadden-R2 (Andreß et al. 1997: 287; Hoffmann 2004: 38).

  14. A value <1 represents a negative influence of the variable, and is marked with a ‘−’ in the tables.

  15. For example, models that compare the impact of the service sector and that of the GNI are only calculated with cases that have values for both. In such a case, the number of cases analysed is reduced to 84.

  16. It should be noted that lifelong learning is only one part of the overall education policy discourse in these organisations. Therefore, it seems reasonable to speak of an organisation influencing a national lifelong learning agenda, but not of an organisation selecting members or partner countries due to their lifelong learning policies and vice versa. The underlying data set is thus not biased due to membership- or policy-selection. There is, however, some bias in the data set concerning countries in Latin America: Countries there tend to submit their reports in the Spanish language, which renders their overall number in the data set rather low (see endnote 6). These countries partly have contact with the OECD through membership or participation in the programmes (Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Jamaica, Peru). Despite the small number, there thus exists some variance on the independent variable ‘IO contact’. Similar arguments apply to Africa, where the number of countries is somewhat higher (but formerly French colonies are underrepresented in the data set, given that they often hand in reports in French.)

  17. I also tested the model that was significant with respect to the diffusion of the idea of lifelong learning, but this did not show significant values. This and further calculations are available upon request.

References

  • Andreß, Hans-Jürgen, Jaques A. Hagenaars and Steffen Kühnel (1997) Analyse von Tabellen und kategorialen Daten. Log-lineare Modelle, latente Klassenanalyse, logistische Regression und GSK-Ansatz, Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ASEM (2002) Lifelong Learning in ASEM Countries: The Way Forward, Singapore: ASEM.

  • ASEM (2005) Asia-Europe Education and Research Hub for Life Long Learning: Programme Opening Conference, 1–4 May, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • ASEM (2007) ‘Chair Statement’, Eighth Asia Europe Meeting, ASEM Foreign Ministers Meeting, 28–29 May, Hamburg, http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/asem/asem8/state0705.pdf (accessed 19 October, 2010).

  • Backhaus, Klaus, Bernd Erichson, Wulff Plinke and Rolf Weiber (2003) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine Einführung, Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel (1973/1999) The Coming of Post-industrial Society, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Frances Stokes and William D. Berry (2007) ‘Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research’, in Paul A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of the Policy Process, 223–60, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boli, John and George M. Thomas (1997) ‘World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-governmental Organization’, American Sociological Review 62 (2): 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boli, John and George M. Thomas, eds (1999) Constructing World Culture, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils (1989) The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decision and Actions in Organizations, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter Ferdinand (1969) ‘The Knowledge Society’, New Society, 629–631.

  • ERT (2003) ERT Highlights. 1983–2003, Brussels: ERT.

  • EU Commission (2000) A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning (SEC 1832), Brussels: EU Commission.

  • EU Commission (2001) Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality COM (2001) 678, Brussels: EU Commission.

  • EU Commission (2005) Towards a European Qualification Framework for Lifelong Learning SEC (2005) 957, Brussels: EU Commission.

  • European Council (1996) Council Conclusions of 20 December on a Strategy for Lifelong Learning (97/C 7/02) Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Council (2000) ‘Presidency Conclusions of the Council of the European Union’, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm (accessed 24 September, 2010).

  • European Council (2002a) Council Resolution of 27 June 2002 on Lifelong Learning 2002/C163/01, Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Council (2002b) Detailed Work Progamme on the Follow-up of the Objectives of Education and Training Systems in Europe 2002/C142/01, Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Union (2006) ‘Decision of the European Parliament and the European Council on the Establishment of a Lifelong Learning Action Programme’, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_327/l_32720061124en00450068.pdf (accessed 1 December, 2008).

  • Expertenkommission zur Finanzierung Lebenslangen Lernens (2004) Finanzierung Lebenslangen Lernens — der Weg in die Zukunft, Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

  • Finnemore, Martha (1993) ‘International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy’, International Organization 47 (4): 565–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Martha (1996) National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (1999) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, in Peter J. Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner, eds, Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics, 247–77, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Bruce and Richard Rubinson, eds (1992) The Political Construction of Education. The State, School Expansion and Economic Change, New York, Westport and London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, Christine (2000) Lebenslanges Lernen. Konzepte und Entwicklungen 1972 bis 1997, Koeln, Weimar and Wien: Boehlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, A. (1996) ‘Lifelong Learning’, in Albert C. Tuijnman, ed., International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training, 33–41, Oxford, New York and Tokyo: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, Adrienne (1993) ‘Policy-Analyse. Elemente der Kritik und Perspektiven der Neuorientierung’, in Adrienne Héritier, ed., Policy Analyse. Kritk und Neurorientierung. PVS Sonderheft 23/1993, 9–36, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heichel, Stephan and Thomas Sommerer (2007) ‘Unterschiedliche Pfade, ein Ziel? — Spezifikationen im Forschungsdesign und Vergleichbarkeit der Ergebnisse bei der Suche nach der Konvergenz nationalstaatlicher Politiken’, in Katharina Holzinger, Helge Jörgens and Christoph Knill, eds, PVS Sonderband ‘Transfer, Diffusion und Konvergenz von Politiken’, 107–30, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, John P. (2004) Generalized Linear Models. An Applied Approach, Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, Katharina, Christoph Knill and Thomas Sommerer (2008) ‘Environmental Policy Convergence: The Impact of International Harmonization, Transnational Communication, and Regulatory Competition’, International Organization 62 (3): 553–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO (1974) C 140 Paid Educational Leave Convention, Geneva: International Labor Office.

  • ILO (2005) ‘Project on National Qualification Frameworks’, http://www.logos-net.net/ilo/ngf/topics/ow/htm (accessed 7 August, 2005).

  • Istance, David (2003) ‘Schooling and Lifelong Learning: Insights from OECD Analyses’, European Journal of Education 38 (1): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Detlef (2006) ‘Globalization as “Galton's Problem”: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development’, International Organization 60 (2): 401–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, Anja (2006) ‘The Worldwide Norm of Lifelong Learning. A Study of Global Policy Development’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld.

  • Jakobi, Anja P. (2007) ‘The Comparative Analysis of Political Programs. Large-N Analyses with Data from International Organizations’, TranState Working Paper No. 69/2007.

  • Jakobi, Anja P. (2009a) International Organizations and Lifelong Learning: From Global Agendas to Policy Diffusion, Houndsmill: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, Anja P. (2009b) ‘Global Education Policy in the Making: International Organizations and Lifelong Learning’, Globalisation, Societies and Education 7 (4): 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Ministry of Education (1996) ‘Development of Education in Japan’, Report prepared for the 45th International Conference on Education, 30 September – 5 October, Geneva, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/Databanks/Dossiers/mainfram.htm (accessed 1 June, 2005).

  • Jeandesboz, Jean (2007) ‘Labelling the “Neighbourhood”: Towards a Genesis of the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kairamo, K., ed. (1989) Education for Life. A European Strategy, London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallen, Denis (1979) ‘Recurrent Education and Lifelong Learning: Definitions and Distinctions’, in Tom Schuller and Jaquetta Megarry, eds, Recurrent Education and Lifelong Learning, 45–54, New York and London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallen, Denis (2002) ‘Lifelong Learning Revisited’, in David Istance, Hans G. Schuetze and Tom Schuller, eds, International Perspectives on Lifelong Learning. From Recurrent Education to the Knowledge Society, 32–38, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph (2005) ‘Introduction: Cross-national Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors’, Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 764–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, Frank and John Boli (2005) World Culture. Origins and Consequences, Malden, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. (2000) ‘Globalization. Sources and Effects on National States and Societies’, International Sociology 15 (2): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. (2005) Weltkultur. Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen, Georg Krücken, ed. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan (1977) ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas and Francisco O. Ramirez (1997a) ‘World Society and the Nation-state’, American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., David John Frank, Ann Hironaka, Evan Schofer and Nancy Brandon Tuma (1997b) ‘The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990’, International Organization 51 (4): 623–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., David Kamens and Aron Benavot (1992) School Knowledge for the Masses, Washington, DC: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. and Franciscon O. Ramirez (2003) ‘The World Institutionalization of Education’, in Juergen Schriever, ed., Discourse Formation in Comparative Education, 2nd edn., 111–32 Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meseguer, Covadonga and Fabrizio Gilardi (2009) ‘What is New in the Study of Policy Diffusion?’ Review of International Political Economy 16 (3): 527–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald B. (2002) ‘International Environment’, in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse and Beth A. Simmons, eds, Handbook of International Relations, 500–16, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2005) ‘Conference Programme of the 2005 Bergen Conference’, http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no (accessed 1 May, 2005).

  • OECD (1995) The OECD Jobs Study. Implementing the Strategy, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (1996) Lifelong Learning for All, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (2000) Motivating Students for Lifelong Learning, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (2002) Completing the Foundations for Lifelong Learning — An OECD Survey of Upper Secondary Schools, Paris: OECD.

  • Papadopoulos, George (1994) Education 1960–1990. The OECD Perspective, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, George (2002) ‘Lifelong Learning and the Changing Policy Environment’, in David Istance, Hans G. Schuetze and Tom Schuller, eds, International Perspectives on Lifelong Learning. From Recurrent Education to the Knowledge Society, 39–46, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualification Framework Working Group (2005) ‘A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area’, http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no (accessed 1 June, 2005).

  • Ramirez, Francisco O. and Phyllis Riddle (1991) ‘The Expansion of Higher Education’, in Philip G. Altenbach, ed., International Higher Education. An Encyclopedia, New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report Australia (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Austria (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Brazil (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Egypt (2004) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE47/English/Natreps/Nrep_main.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Estonia (2004) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE47/English/Natreps/Nrep_main.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Finland (1996) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/Databanks/Dossiers/mainfram.htm (accessed 1 July, 2005).

  • Report Israel (2004) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE47/English/Natreps/Nrep_main.htm, (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Mauritius (2004) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE47/English/Natreps/Nrep_main.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Peru (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report South Korea (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Swaziland (2004) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE47/English/Natreps/Nrep_main.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Syria (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Report Thailand (2001) ‘National Education Policy Report submitted to the International Conference on Education’, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/46english/46natrape.htm (accessed 1 May, 2009).

  • Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink, eds, (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. (2003) The Diffusion of Innovations, London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, A. and D. Bowland (1996) ‘International Labour Organization’, in Albert C. Tuijnman, ed. International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training, 2nd edn., 704–09 Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, Tom, Hans G. Schuetze and David Istance (2002) ‘From Recurrent Education to the Knowledge Society: An Introduction’, in David Istance, Hans G. Schuetze and Tom Schuller, eds, International Perspectives on Lifelong Learning: From Recurrent Education to the Knowledge Society, 1–21, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth A., Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett, eds, (2008a) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth A., Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett (2008b) ‘Introduction: The Diffusion of Liberalization’, in Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett, eds, The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, 1–63, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.M. (1996) ‘Learning to Learn’, in Albert C. Tuijnman, ed. International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training, 2nd edn., 418–22 Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, P.J. (1996) ‘Lifelong and Continuing Education’, in Albert C. Tuijnman, ed., International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training, 2nd edn., 27–33 Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuijnman, Albert C. (1989) Recurrent Education, Earnings, and Well-Being, Stockholm: International.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1971) World Survey of Education v. Educational Policy, Legislation and Administration, Paris: UNESCO.

  • UNESCO (1972) Learning to Be: The World of Education Today and Tomorrow, Paris: UNESCO.

  • UNESCO (1996) Learning: The Treasure Within, Paris: UNESCO.

  • UNESCO (2000) World Education Report 2000. The Right to Education: Towards Education for All throughout Life, Paris: UNESCO.

  • UNESCO (2001) Revised Recommendation Concerning Technical and Vocational Education, Paris: UNESCO.

  • UNESCO (2003) World Data on Education, 5th edn. (CD-ROM), Geneva: UNESCO/IBE.

  • UNESCO (2005) Towards Knowledge Societies, Paris: UNESCO.

  • Wurzburg, Gregor (2003) ‘Charts of the Lifelong Learning Workshop Sponsored by the World Bank and the Slovak Governance Institute: Lifelong Learning — What Lessons from Experience in the OECD?’, December, http://www.worldbank.org/education/lifelong_learning (accessed 7 July, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). I thank the reviewers and editors, as well as participants of the ECPR Joint Session 2009 on education policy for very helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakobi, A. International organisations and policy diffusion: the global norm of lifelong learning. J Int Relat Dev 15, 31–64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2010.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2010.20

Keywords

Navigation