Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantifying the environmental benefits of collection/delivery points

  • Original Article
  • Published:
OR Insight

Abstract

Using a node-based routing and scheduling package, this paper estimates the environmental impacts of using a local railway station as a collection/delivery point (CDP) for small parcel transactions. This delivery option was compared with a typical existing situation where some customers who suffer a failed home delivery attempt decide to travel to the carrier's depot to collect their goods. The modelled results suggested that, at a 20 per cent take-up level, the CDP method would reduce the carbon monoxide emissions associated with the deliveries by around 20 per cent and other emissions (nitrogen oxide, particulate matter, carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons) by between 13 per cent and 15 per cent, with higher savings at higher take-up levels. The customer mileage attributable to the collection was modelled to reduce by up to 33 per cent. Modest travel savings were also found for the carrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertsimas, D.J. (1992) A vehicle routing problem with stochastic demand. Operations Research 40 (3): 574–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, S. (1998) Promises and problems: Using GIS to understand home shopping travel. Journal of Transport Geography 6 (4): 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, S. (2005) Delivering supermarket shopping: More or less traffic? Transport Reviews 25 (1): 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeau, J., Gendreau, M., Laporte, G., Potvin, J. and Semet, F. (2002) A guide to vehicle routing heuristics. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53 (5): 512–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry. (2001) @Your Home: New Markets for Customer Service and Delivery. DTI Foresight publication 5749 2K/10/01/NP.URN 01/1098.

  • Ioannou, G., Kritikos, M. and Prastacos, G. (2001) A greedy look-ahead heuristic for the vehicle routing problem with time windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52 (5): 523–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, F.N., Cherrett, T.J. and Song, L. (2006) Transport impacts of local collection/ delivery points. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 9 (3): 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic-Minic, S. and Laporte, G. (2004) Waiting strategies for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38 (7): 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, G. and Salhi, S. (2007) Location-routing: Issues, models and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 177 (2): 649–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A. (2001) The Effects of Grocery Home Shopping on Road Traffic. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Report to the Retail Logistics Task Force, 2001. Revised by McKinnon A.

  • Punakivi, M. and Saranen, J. (2001) Identifying the success factors in e-grocery home delivery. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 30 (10): 498–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repoussis, P., Tarantilis, C. and Ioannou, G. (2007) The open vehicle routing problem with time windows. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58: 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, J. (2006) Valuing home delivery-where's my stuff? In: G. Marsden (ed.) Wasted Miles, Wasted Money (a Less Congested, More Energy Efficient Future). Cambridge, UK: CICC Publications, pp. 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, P. (2006) Unattended delivery solutions-finally picking up? Fulfilment and E.Logistics 39: 19–20.

  • Song, L. (2008) Transport and environmental impacts of current home delivery services and the benefits of alternative measures. PhD thesis, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton.

  • Turner, M.W. (2007) ‘Sorry, we tried to deliver but you weren’t in’ – Quantifying the impacts of failed first time deliveries. MSc dissertation, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton.

  • Zeimpekis, V.S., Tarantilis, C.D., Giaglis, G.M. and Minis, I. (eds.) (2007) Dynamic fleet management – concepts, systems, algorithms and case studies. Book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, Vol. 38, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transportation Research Group, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    Fraser N McLeod & Tom J Cherrett

Authors
  1. Fraser N McLeod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tom J Cherrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fraser N McLeod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLeod, F., Cherrett, T. Quantifying the environmental benefits of collection/delivery points. OR Insight 22, 127–139 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.2

Keywords

Search

Navigation