Skip to main content
Log in

Japanese Corporate Governance: Structural Change and Financial Performance

  • Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes institutional and legal changes related to corporate governance and their impact on financial performance in Japan since the second half of the 1990s. We attempt to address two issues systematically: (1) how much the governance reforms of Japanese firms transformed the conventional system of alliance capitalism and managerial control; and (2) what economic outcomes those governance changes have yielded. As the Commercial Code and other legal and institutional frameworks were revised, Japanese firms experienced shifts in terms of stock ownership, corporate control and managerial organizations. Our empirical results show that the influence of new ownership composition and reformed governance mechanisms on financial performance remains varied. We find that certain factors, such as foreign and financial investors, functioned positively, while others, like the executive officer system and stock options, had little or negative performance effect. Japanese management apparently appeased market investor pressure by superficially institutionalizing various governance reforms, while enhancing financial performance through strategic modifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While some studies found an inverted U-curve relationship between managerial ownership and performance (Morck et al., 1988), it was not apparent in this sample. We run the regressions with mean-centered executive ownership and its squared term, and the squared term was insignificant.

  2. A close examination of the only readily available data on executive compensation in terms of salary and bonus (that appears as an item among administrative and selling expenses in Nikkei Needs, which includes not only executives’ salary, but also the provision for executives’ retirement allowances and the executives’ bonus treated as administrative and selling expenses) shows that that data are often incomplete and inaccurate.

References

  • Ahmadjian, C.L. and Robinson, P. (2001) ‘Safety in numbers: downsizing and deinstitutionalisation of permanent employment in Japan’, Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 622–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, H. (2004) ‘Boardroom reform in Japanese business: an analysis of the introduction of the executive officer system and its effects’, Asian Business & Management 3 (2): 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, R.J., Hoshi, T. and Kashyap, A.K. (2006) Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan, Working Paper Series, 06-06, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Charkham, J. (1994) Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. (1979) The Japanese Company, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpan, A.M., Hikino, T. and Yoshikawa, T. (2007) ‘Governance vs. strategy as the determinant of profitability: Japanese enterprises in transition’, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Philadelphia.

  • Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E. and Johnson, J.L. (1998) ‘Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal 19: 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D.K. and McConnel, J.J. (2003) ‘International corporate governance’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields’, American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) ‘Agency theory: an assessment and review’, Academy of Management Review 14: 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1980) ‘Agency problems and the theory of the firm’, Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P.C. and Zajac, E.J. (2004) ‘The diffusion of ideas: the (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly 49: 501–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukao, M. (1999) ‘Japanese financial instability and weakness in the corporate governance structure, OECD Working Paper, Paris.

  • Gedajlovic, E. and Shapiro, D.M. (2002) ‘Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan’, Academy of Management Journal 45: 565–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Yoshikawa, T. and Hashimoto, M. (2005) ‘Ownership structure, investment behavior and firm performance in Japanese manufacturing industries’, Organisation Studies 26: 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M.L. (1992) Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organisation of Japanese Business, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, R.J. and Milhaupt, C.J. (2004) ‘Choice as regulatory reform: the case of Japanese corporate governance’, Working Paper 251, Columbia University Law School Center for Law and Economic Studies.

  • Hoshi, T. and Kashyap, A. (2001) Corporate Financing and Governance in Japan, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, H. (1999) The Accelerating Dissolution of Stock Cross-Holding, Tokyo: NLI Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. and Moerke, A. (2005) ‘Continuity and change in corporate governance: comparing Germany and Japan’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 13: 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1986) ‘Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers’, American Economic Review 76: 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J.L., Daily, C.M. and Ellstrand, A.E. (1996) ‘Boards of directors: a review and research agenda’, Journal of Management 22: 409–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabushiki Bunpu Chosa [Stock distribution survey] (2004), Tokyo: Association of Stock Exchanges.

  • Kang, J.K. and Shivdasani, A. (1995) ‘Firm performance, corporate governance and top executive turnover in Japan’, Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, H.K., Lemmon, M., Luo, M. and Schallheim, J. (2005) ‘An empirical examination of the costs and benefits of executive stock options: evidence from Japan’, Journal of Financial Economics 78 (2): 435–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, W.C. (1991) Japanese Takeovers: The Global Contest for Corporate Control, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, K. (2005) ‘Executive compensation policy and company performance in Japan’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (3): 429–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalised organisations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 87: 340–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyajima, H. and Aoki, H. (2002) ‘Changes in the J-type Firm: From Bank-centred Governance to Internal Governance’, in J. Maswood, J. Graham and H. Miyajima (eds.) Japan: Change and Continuity, London: Routledge Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyajima, H. and Arikawa, Y. (2001) ‘Changing Corporate Finance and its Impact on Corporate Strategy After the Bubble Period: Is Long-term Strategy of Japanese Firms Really Changing?’, in U.C.V. Haley and F.J. Richter (eds.) Asian Post-Crisis Management: Corporate and Government Strategies for Sustainable Competitive Advantage, London: Macmillan/St. Martin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyajima, H. and Kuroki, F. (2005) ‘Unwinding of cross-shareholding: causes, effects and implications’, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 05-E-006.

  • Miyajima, H. and Nitta, K. (2006) ‘Nihongata torishimaryakukai no tagenteki shinka: Sono kettei yoin to pafomansu koka [Pluralistic evolution of Japanese board of directors: Determinants and performance implications]’, Waseda University Institute of Finance Working Paper Series, WIF-06-003.

  • Miyajima, H. and Kuroki, F. (2007) ‘The Unwinding of Cross-shareholding in Japan: Causes, Effects and Implications’, in M. Aoki, G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds.) Corporate Governance in Japan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1988) ‘Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis?’ Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R. and Yeung, B. (2006) ‘Purifying Japan's banks: issues and implications’, Asian Economic Papers 5: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka, S. (2005) ‘Determinants of the introduction of stock options by Japanese firms: analysis from incentive and selection perspectives’, Journal of Business 78 (6): 2289–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitta, K. (2000) ‘Cross shareholdings and business management: an empirical analysis’, Security Analysts Journal 38: 72–93, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • NLI Research Institute. (2004) Kabushiki mochiai jokyo chosa 2003 (Cross-shareholdings Survey 2003), Tokyo: NLIRI (in Japanese).

  • Nomura Research Institute. (2007) Newsletter, February, Available at http://www.nri.co.jp/publicity/n_letter/2007/pdf/nl20070202.pdf.

  • Okumura, H. (2000) Corporate Capitalism in Japan, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991) ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes’, Academy of Management Review 16: 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control of Organisations, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P.H. and Yoshikawa, T. (2000) ‘Agency theory and Japanese corporate governance’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, T. and Yonezawa, Y. (2000) ‘Corporate governance and shareholder value’, Security Analysts Journal 38: 28–46, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, P. (1994) ‘Interlocking Shareholdings and Corporate Governance’, in M. Aoki and R. Dore (eds.) The Japanese Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 310–349.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shimotani, M. (2006) Mochikabu-kaisha no Jidai: Nihon no Kigyo-ketsugo (The Age of the Holding Company: Industrial Combination in Japan), Tokyo: Yuhikaku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suto, M. and Toshino, M. (2005) ‘Behavioral biases of Japanese institutional investors: fund management and corporate governance’, Corporate Governance: An International Review 13: 466–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K. (2005) ‘Japanese firms’ stock option (Nihon Kigyo no Stock Option)’, DIR Market Bulletin 3: 6–51, (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. (1998) ‘Corporate leadership in a globalising equity market’, Academy of Management Executive 12 (4): 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S. and Yamamoto, I. (1992) ‘Corporate governance in Japan: ways to improve low profitability’, NRI Quarterly 1 (3): 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, D. and Yafeh, Y. (1998) ‘On the costs of a bank-centred financial system: evidence from the changing main bank relations in Japan’, Journal of Finance 53: 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D. and Zajac, E.J. (2001) ‘Decoupling policy from practice: the case of stock repurchase programs’, Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 202–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (1996) ‘Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors’, Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T. and Linton, J. (2000) ‘The applicability of North American corporate governance and investor relations practice to Japanese firms’, Journal of Asian Business 16: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T. and McGuire, J. (2007) ‘Change and continuity in Japanese corporate governance’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, forthcoming.

  • Yoshikawa, T. and Phan, P.H. (2001) ‘Alternative corporate governance systems in Japanese firms: implications for a shift to stockholder-centred corporate governance’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 18: 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T. and Phan, P.H. (2003) ‘The performance implications of ownership-driven governance reform’, European Management Journal 6: 698–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T., Phan, P.H. and David, P. (2005) ‘The impact of ownership structure on wage intensity in Japanese corporations’, Journal of Management 31: 278–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hideaki Miyajima, Masahiro Shimotani, Michio Tsuchida and participants at the ABM conference of ITEC, Doshisha University for their helpful comments. Funding from the 21st Century COE (Center of Excellence) program of Institute for Technology, Enterprise and Competitiveness, Doshisha University is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colpan, A., Yoshikawa, T., Hikino, T. et al. Japanese Corporate Governance: Structural Change and Financial Performance. Asian Bus Manage 6 (Suppl 1), S89–S113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200240

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200240

Keywords

Navigation