Skip to main content
Log in

The differences between branding a country, a region and a city: Applying the Brand Box Model

  • Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Branding has become one of the most powerful tools in marketing strategy. There has been a general agreement among academics and practitioners that places can be branded in the same way as consumer goods and services. Destination branding is a relatively new concept, however, and there is a lack of empirical academic research on the topic. This exploratory study uses the de Chernatony Brand Box Model and applies it to countries, regions and cities. The study was developed in order to understand and clarify whether the same branding techniques should be applied to these three different types of places. The results point to differences between countries when compared with regions and cities. Countries are so functionally diverse they should leverage the emotive or representational parts of their brand identity, while regions and cities, being smaller in scale, should leverage their more functional facets. It seems that regions have more in common with cities from a branding point of view, and this has implications for branding strategies for all three types of tourist destinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niall Caldwell.

Additional information

1teaches at London Metropolitan University. His research interests are in branding cultural organisations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caldwell, N., Freire, J. The differences between branding a country, a region and a city: Applying the Brand Box Model. J Brand Manag 12, 50–61 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540201

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540201

Keywords

Navigation