Skip to main content
Log in

The Social Irresponsibility of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Taking CSR to the bottom line

  • Thematic Section
  • Published:
Development Aims and scope

Abstract

Tax revenues are the lifeblood of democratic government and the social contract, but the majority of multinational businesses have been structured so as to enable tax avoidance in every jurisdiction in which they operate. John Christensen and Richard Murphy of the tax justice network argue that policy measures are required to redress the distortions that have arisen as globalized companies have left nationally based tax regimes floundering. Businesses should adopt corporate social responsibility standards on taxation, including requirements to publish all necessary accounting information and to refrain from the use of profits-laundering vehicles created without substantial economic purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr, in the case of Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue, 1904.

  2. The term aggressive tax avoidance is used by revenue officials in the US and UK to describe transactions whose primary or whole purpose is the avoidance of tax.

  3. Source: Statement by Senator Joseph I. Lieberman to the US Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, 18 November 2003

  4. This principle was firmly established in the UK by the Duke of Westminster case (1936) and applies in many jurisdictions around the world.

  5. Source: French Finance Minister Dominique Strauss-Kahn, quoted from a speech to the Paris Group of Experts, March 1999.

  6. Source: the Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs, quoted in ‘Tax avoiders rob wealth of nations’, The Observer, 17 November 2002.

  7. The weakness of the Bolivian fiscal system illustrates the problems faced by so many developing countries. In 2003, the Bolivian National Congress sought to change the tax code in order to recover €355 million in revenue arrears and bring thousands of businesses into the formal tax sector for the first time ever. Facing a fiscal deficit of 8.8 per cent in the current budget, Bolivia is struggling to stave off economic collapse, but endemic tax evasion by local business elites has made the state increasingly reliant on multilateral credits and grants from donor countries.

References

  • Avi-Yonah R. (2000) ‘Globalization, Tax Competition and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State’, Harvard Law Review 13: 1573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D. (2001) ‘Revenue's Let-off for Big Business’, Financial Mail on Sunday, 2 March.

  • Boskin M.J. and W.G. Gale (1987) ‘New Results on the Effects of Tax Policy on the International Location of Investment’, in Martin S, Feldstein (ed.) The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation. Chicago: University pf Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen J. and M.P. Hampton (2000) ‘The Economics of Offshore: Who wins, who loses?’, The Financial Regulator 4 (4): 24–26.

  • Fine P. (2004) ‘Tax Havens Exploited by US Businesses’, Accountancy Age, 9 March.

  • Freedman J. (2003) ‘Tax and Corporate Responsibility’, The Tax Journal, 2 June.

  • Gray J. (1998) False Dawn: The delusions of global capitalism, London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton M.P. (1996) The Offshore Interface: Tax havens in the global economy, Basingstoke: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton M.P. and J. Christensen (2003) ‘A Provocative Dependence? The Global Financial System and Small Island Tax Havens’, in F. Cochrane, R. Duffy and J. Selby (eds.) Global Governance, Conflict and Resistance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines J.R. (1999) ‘Lessons from Behavioural Responses to International Taxation’, National Tax Journal 52: 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton W. (2002) The World We’re In, London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston D.C. (2003) ‘Tax Moves by Enron Said to Mystify the IRS’, New York Times, 13 February.

  • Lasch C. (1995) The Revolt of the Elites, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell A., P. Sikka, J. Christensen, P. Morris and S. Filling (2002) ‘No Accounting for Tax Havens’. Basildon, England: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R. (2004) ‘Location, Location’, Accountancy, March.

  • Oxfam GB (2000) Tax Havens: Releasing the hidden billions for poverty eradication, briefing paper, Oxford June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan R., J. Abbott and P. Deans (1996) State Strategies in the Global Political Economy, London: Pinter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2003) ‘17% premium for good governance’. World Watch Issue 1.

  • Sikka P. (2003) ‘A Taxing Account of Corporate Social Responsibility’, The Guardian, 17 November.

  • Sikka P. (2004) ‘Nobody is Called to Account’, The Guardian, 6 February.

  • Tanzi V (2000) Globalization, Technological Developments and the Work of Fiscal Termites, WP/00/181. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2004) ‘A Taxing Battle’, 31 January.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, J., Murphy, R. The Social Irresponsibility of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Taking CSR to the bottom line. Development 47, 37–44 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100066

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100066

Keywords

Navigation