Skip to main content
Log in

performing governance through networks

  • Research
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Governance networks typically function in the absence of clearly defined constitutional rules. Network actors, therefore, have to develop a common understanding of the problem as well as build a basis for mutual trust. We suggest that discourse-analytical and dramaturgical concepts can be helpful instruments to analyse these dynamics of trust building in governance networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Whereby multi-cultural does not refer to ethnicity but is conceived more broadly as referring to the fact that participating actors will bring different cultural codes to the situation.

References

  • Austin, J.L. (1955) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969) Grammar of Motives, London and Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds.) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planing, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Futrell, R. (1999) ‘Performative governance: Impression management, teamwork and conflict containment in city commission proceedings’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 27 (4): 494–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J.R. (1981) The Culture of Public Problems. Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. (2000) ‘Transnational Networks as Transnational Policy Discourse. Some Observations on the Politics of Spatial Development in Europe’, in W. Salet and A. Faludi (eds.) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Amsterdam: KNAW, pp. 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. (2003) ‘Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void’, Policy Sciences 36, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. (2005) ‘Setting the stage: a dramaturgy of policy making’, Administration and Society 36, 624–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariman, R. (1995) Political Style: The Artistry of Power, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, S. (2001) Science on Stage, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2000) Network Power in Collaborative Planning, Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999) Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1991) ‘Laboratory space and the technological complex: an investigation of topical contextures’, Science in context 4 (1): 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1995) Democratic Governance, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. (1997) ‘The trans-European transport network: Environmental policy integration in the European Union’, European Union and Regional Studies 4 (4): 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. and Jensen, O.B. (2004) ‘The Europeanisation of spatial planning in Britain; new spatial ideas for old territories?’ paper presented to the ESRC/UACES study group on the Europeanisation of British politics and policy making, Sheffield, 23 April.

  • Shachar, A. (2001) Multicultural Jurisdictions – Cultural Differences and Women's Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2005) ‘The democratic problems and potentials of network governance’, European Political Science 4 (3), 342–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szerszynski, B., Heim, W. and Waterton, C.A. (2003) ‘Nature performed environment, culture and performance-Introduction’, Sociological Review 51: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. (2005) ‘Governance network theory: towards a second generation’, European Political Science 4 (3), 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1982) From Ritual to Theatre; the Human Seriousness of Play, New York: PAJ publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1996) ‘Communities of practice: The social fabric of a learning organization’, Healthcare Forum 39 (4): 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1993) ‘The communication of policy meanings: Implementation as interpretation and text’, Policy Sciences 26, 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1996) How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy and Organizational Action, Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hajer, M., Versteeg, W. performing governance through networks. Eur Polit Sci 4, 340–347 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034

Keywords

Navigation