Abstract
This paper examines some of the key challenges critical terrorism studies will have to face. Starting from the premise that a critical turn must both challenge traditional approaches to ‘terrorism’ and provide an umbrella under which traditional and critical perspectives from ‘terrorism studies’ and cognate fields can converge, the article reflects on the tensions this will introduce, ranging from how to define the boundaries of a critical field and whether to adopt the term ‘terrorism’ as a field delineator, to the need for policy-relevance and the tensions this introduces between striving to influence policy and avoiding co-optation. The paper ends with a reflection on the challenge of being sensitive to cultural and contextual differences while remaining true to one's emancipatory agenda.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Amr, Z. (1994) Islamic Fundamentalism in the West Bank and Gaza: Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Jihad, Indiana Series in Arab and Islamic Studies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Alker, H. (2004) ‘Emancipation in the Critical Security Studies Project’, in K. Booth (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 189–214.
Booth, K. (2004a) ‘Introduction to Part 3 (Emancipation)’, in K. Booth (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 181–188.
Booth, K. (2004b) ‘Beyond Critical Security Studies’, in K. Booth (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 259–289.
Burnett, J. and Whyte, D. (2005) ‘Embedded expertise and the new terrorism’, Journal for Crime, Conflict and the Media 1 (4): 1–18.
Butler, J. (1996) ‘Universality in Culture’, in J. Cohen (ed.) For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism – Martha C. Nussbaum with respondents, Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 45–52.
Cox, R. (1981) ‘Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–155.
della Porta, D. (ed.) (1992) Social Movements and Violence: Participation in Underground Organizations, International Social Movement Research, 4, London: JAI Press.
Derrida, J. (1996) ‘Remarks on Decostruction and Pragmatism’, in C. Mouffe (ed.) Deconstruction and Pragmatism, London: Routledge, pp. 77–88.
Gordon, A. (2004) ‘Terrorism and Knowledge Growth: A Database and Internet analysis’, in A. Silke (ed.) Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, London: Frank Cass, pp. 104–118.
Gunning, J. (2004) ‘Peace with Hamas? The transforming potential of political participation’, International Affairs 80 (2): 233–255.
Gunning, J. (2007a) ‘A case for critical terrorism studies?’ Government and Opposition 42 (3): 363–393.
Gunning, J. (2007b) Hamas in Politics: Democracy, Religion, Violence, London: Hurst.
Halliday, F. (1996) Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics in the Middle East, London: Tauris.
Heiberg, M., Tirman, J. and O'Leary, B. (eds.) (2007) Terror, Insurgency and the State: Ending Protracted Conflicts, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hillyard, P. (1993) Suspect Community: People's Experience of the Prevention of Terrorism Acts in Britain, London: Pluto Press.
Hroub, K (2000) Hamas: Political Thought and Practice, Washington DC: Institute for Palestine Studies.
Hutchings, K. (2001) ‘The Nature of Critique in Critical International Relations Theory’, in R. Wyn Jones (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics, London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 79–90.
Jackson, R. (2007) ‘Terrorism studies and the politics of state power’, Paper Prepared for the International Studies Association (ISA) Annual Convention, 28 February–3 March 2007, Chicago, USA.
Milton-Edwards, B. (1996) Islamic Politics in Palestine, London: Tauris.
Mishal, S. and Sela, A. (2000) The Palestinian Hamas: Vision, Violence, and Coexistence, New York: Columbia University Press.
Ranstorp, M. (2006) ‘Mapping Terrorism Research: Challenges and Priorities’, in M. Ranstorp (ed.) Mapping Terrorism Research: State of the Art, Gaps and Future Direction, London: Routledge, pp. 2–24.
Rengger, N. (2001) ‘Negative Dialectic? The Two Modes of Critical Theory in World Politics’, in R. Wyn Jones (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics, London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 91–109.
Silke, A. (2003) Terrorists, Victims and Society: Psychological Perspectives on Terrorism and its Consequences, Chichester: Wiley.
Silke, A. (2004) ‘The Road Less Travelled: Recent Trends in Terrorism Research’, in A. Silke (ed.) Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, London: Frank Cass, pp. 186–213.
Toros, H. (2006) ‘Joining forces: bringing peace research into terrorism studies’, Paper Prepared for the British International Studies Association (BISA) Annual Conference, 18–20 December 2006, University College, Cork.
Williams, M. and Krause, K. (1997) ‘Preface’, in K. Krause and M. Williams (eds.) Critical Security Studies, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxi.
Wyn Jones, R. (2004) ‘On emancipation: necessity, capacity, and concrete Utopias’, in K. Booth (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 215–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gunning, J. babies and bathwaters: reflecting on the pitfalls of critical terrorism studies. Eur Polit Sci 6, 236–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210144
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210144