Skip to main content
Log in

A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service sector

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the performance of a firm improves with greater multinationality. Yet recent empirical studies have shown both a U-shaped relationship (which suggests an initially negative effect of international expansion on performance, before the positive returns of international expansion are realized) and an inverted-U-shaped relationship (which suggests that international expansion beyond an optimal level is again detrimental to performance, and results in a negative slope). This paper proposes a new unified three-stage theory of international expansion that incorporates both concepts in a sigmoid hypothesis. It then tests this on data from 11 service industries, highlighting the difference between knowledge-based and capital-intensive service sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Obaidan, A.M. and Scully, G.W. (1995) ‘The theory and measurement of the net benefits of internationalization: the case of the international petroleum sector’, Applied Economics 27(2): 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annavarjula, M. and Beldona, S. (2000) ‘Multinationality–performance relationship: a review and reconceptualization’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 8(1): 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J.J., Halbrich, M.B. and Perry, A.C. (1986) ‘Service multinationals: conceptualisation, measurement and theory’, Journal of International Business Studies 17(3): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W. and Goodstein, J. (1991) ‘Organizational performance and adaptation: effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition’, Academic Management Journal 34(4): 805–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, H.L. (1981) ‘Investor benefits from corporate international diversification’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16: 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J., Dunning, J.H. and Pearce, R.B. (1977) ‘The influence of firm size, sector, nationality, and degree of multinationality in the growth and profitability of the world's largest firms’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 114: 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J., Dunning, J.H. and Pearce, R.B. (1984) ‘An analysis of the growth and profitability of the worlds largest firms 1972 to 1977’, Kyklos 37: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.M. (1990) ‘A market performance comparison of US firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries’, Journal of International Business Studies 2: 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F.J. (2002) ‘International expansion strategies’, in International Encyclopaedia of Business and Management, International Thomson Business Press: London, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, J.D. and Bracker, J. (1989) ‘Profit performance: do foreign operations make a difference? Management International Review 29(1): 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1993) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Addison-Wesley: Wokingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, M.K. (1987) ‘Understanding the foreign market entry mode choice in service firms: an exploratory study’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arkansas, UMI Dissertation Information Services: Ann Arbor.

  • Errunza, V.R. and Senbet, L.W. (1981) ‘The effect of international operations on the market value of the firm: theory and evidence’, Journal of Finance 36: 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R. and Kazanjian, R. (1986) Strategy Implementation, West Publishing: St Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J.M., Beamish, P.W. and daCosta, R.C. (1989) ‘Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE Performance’, Strategic Management Journal 10(2): 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, L.K. and Ramaswamy, K. (1999) ‘An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance’, Journal of International Business Studies 30(1): 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gongming, Q. (1998) ‘Determinants of profit performance for the largest US firms 1981–92’, Multinational Business Review 6(2): 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (1987) ‘Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies’, Journal of International Business Studies 18(1): 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M., Jammine, A.P. and Thomas, H. (1988) ‘Diversity, diversification and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972–1984’, Academy Management Journal 31: 771–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haar, J. (1989) ‘A comparative analysis of the profitability performance of the largest US, European, and Japanese Multinational Enterprises’, Management International Review 29(3): 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, K., Lee, S. and Suk, D. (1998) ‘Multinationality and firm performance’, Multinational Business Review 6(2): 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.W. and Phan, P. (1991) ‘CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay’, Academy Management Journal 34(3): 707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R. and Ireland, R. (1990) ‘Mergers and acquisitions and managerial commitment to innovation in M-form firms’, Strategic Management Journal 11: 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R. and Ireland, R. (1994) ‘A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance’, Journal of Management 20(2): 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R. and Kim, H. (1997) ‘International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms’, Academy Management Journal 40(4): 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst, T. (1972) ‘Firm and industry determinants of the decision to invest abroad: an empirical study’, Reviews of Economic Statistics 54: 258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1995) ‘Panel analysis for metric data’, in G. Arminger, C.C. Clogg and M.E. Sobel (eds.) Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavior Sciences, Plenum Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.- E. (1977) ‘The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.- E. (1990) ‘The mechanism of internationalization’, International Market Review 7(4): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y. (1991) ‘Multinationality and profitability’, Journal of Business Research 23: 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.C., Hwang, P. and Burgers, W.P. (1989) ‘Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance’, Strategic Management Journal 10(1): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.S. and Lyn, E.O. (1987) ‘Foreign direct investment theories, entry barriers, and reverse investments in US manufacturing industries’, Journal of International Business Studies 18(2): 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1986) Elements of Econometrics, Macmillan: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S.J. (1991) ‘An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration’, Strategic Management Journal 12: 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1985) ‘Designing global strategies: profiting from operational flexibility’, Sloan Management Review 26: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S.S. and Aulakh, P.S. (2002) ‘Multinationality and firm performance: the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities’, Journal of International Business Studies 33(1): 70–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M.S. (1984) Growth, Acquisition and Investment: An Analysis of the Growth of Industrial Firms and their Overseas Activities, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K..

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, A. and Shaked, I. (1986) ‘ Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: financial performance and characteristics’, Journal of International Business Studies 17(3): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R. and Yeung, B. (1991) ‘Why investors value multinationality’, Journal of Business 64(20): 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M. (1971) ‘Further evidence on estimation of dynamic economic relations from a time series of cross sections’, Econometrics 39(2): 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M.H. (1990) Applied Linear Statistical Models, Irwin: Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, T. and Pedersen, B. (1998) ‘Explaining gradually increasing resource commitment to a foreign market’, International Business Review 7(3): 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, T., Pedersen, B. and Sharma, D. (2002) ‘The role of knowledge in firms' internationalization process: wherefrom and whereto?’ in A. Blomstrom and D.D. Sharma (eds.) Learning in the Internationalization Process of Firms, North Hampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, G. (1997) ‘Assessing product- market diversification of US firms’, Management International Review 37(2): 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, K. (1993) ‘Multinationality and performance: an empirical examination of the moderating effect of configuration’, Proceedings of Academy Management 142–146.

  • Ramaswamy, K. (1995) ‘Multinationality, configuration, and performance: a study of MNEs in the US drug and pharmaceutical sector’, Journal of International Management 1: 231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, K., Kroeck, K.G. and Renforth, W. (1996) ‘Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm: a comment’, Journal of International Business Studies 27: 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W. and Wagner, H. (2002) ‘Internationalization and performance: an organizational learning perspective’, Management International Review, (forthcoming).

  • Rugman, A.M. (1981) Inside the Multinational: The Economics of International Markets, Croom Helm: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayrs, L. (1989) Pooled Time-Series Analysis.

  • Shaked, I. (1986) ‘Are multinational corporations safer?’ Journal of International Business Studies 17(1): 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddharthan, N.S. and Lall, S. (1982) ‘Recent growth of the largest US multinationals’, Oxford Bulletin of Economic Statistics 44: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. (1994a) ‘Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm’, Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. (1994b) ‘The “threshold of internationality”: replication, extension, and reinterpretation’, Management International Review 34(2): 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S. and Li, J.T. (1996) ‘Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms’, Academy Management Journal 39: 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. (1986) ‘Profiting from technological innovation’, Research Policy 15: 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International investment and international trade in the product life cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1971) Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises, Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) World Development Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Zaheer, S. and Mosakowski, E. (1997) ‘The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services’, Strategic Management Journal 18: 439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit K Kundu.

Additional information

Accepted by Tom Brewer, outgoing Editor, 11 October 2001. This paper has been with the author for 2 revisions.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Whereas the existing literature uses at least a curvilinear quadratic specification, we adopted a referee's strong suggestion to show, in Table 8, results using only a first-order specification for DOI. The three columns in the table, for Models A, C and K, correspond to Tables 5, 6 and 7 above.

Table a1 Results with linear specification for DOI only

These results, as expected, show that performance is positively affected by multinationality. However, lacking the second- and third-order terms for DOI, the more complex relationship between these two variables cannot be seen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Contractor, F., Kundu, S. & Hsu, CC. A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. J Int Bus Stud 34, 5–18 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400003

Navigation