Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that a fruitful approach to the analysis of inter-organisational power in multinational corporations (MNCs) is to model the organisation as a federation. In the federative MNC, the headquarters and the subsidiaries are involved in a perpetual bargaining process. Thus a crucial issue is what power bases are there that the different actors in the federative MNC can use to influence strategic decisions. In this paper, we focus on the power bases associated with the local business network in which the different subsidiaries are embedded, and on the headquarters’ knowledge concerning these networks. A causal model is developed and tested with data from 97 subsidiaries in 20 MNC divisions. The results indicate that the strength and influence of a subsidiary's local business network are determined by the extent to which the subsidiary provides technology within the MNC. The fact that the business network is strong does not suffice to augment the intra-organisational power of a subsidiary. In addition, our investigation also provides support for the idea that, when the headquarters has a sound knowledge of the subsidiaries’ business networks, it is better able to balance or moderate the influence of strong subsidiaries. The paper concludes by pointing out a potential dilemma facing the headquarters of the federative MNC: externally embedded subsidiaries can provide access to a variety of competencies, but they may also reduce the subsidiaries’ interest in contributing to the overall performance of the MNC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988) ‘Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach’, Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U. and Forsgren, M. (1996) ‘Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation’, International Business Review 5 (5): 487–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U. and Pahlberg, C. (1997) ‘Subsidiary influence on strategic behavior in MNCs: an empirical study’, International Business Review 6 (3): 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2001) ‘Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: a multilevel analysis’, Organization Studies 22 (6): 1013–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2002) ‘The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation’, Strategic Management Journal 23 (11): 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asakawa, K. (2001) ‘Organizational tension in international R&D management: the case of Japanese firms’, Research Policy 30 (5): 735–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astley, G. and Sachdewa, P. (1984) ‘Structural sources of intraorganizational power: a theoretical synthesis’, Academy of Management Review 9 (1): 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, G. and Zajac, E. (1990) ‘Beyond dyadic exchange: functional interdependence and sub-unit power’, Organization Studies 11 (4): 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1997) ‘Managing innovation in the transnational corporation’, in M. Tushman and P. Anderson (eds.) Managing Strategic Innovation and Change, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp: 452–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. and Fry, N. (1998) ‘Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets’, Sloan Management Review 39 (3): 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. and Hood, N. (1998) ‘Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies’, Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. and Morrison, A.M. (1995) ‘Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational structure’, Journal of International Business Studies 26 (4): 729–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J.M., Hood, N. and Jonsson, S. (1998) ‘Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative’, Strategic Management Journal 19 (3): 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (1993) Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage: Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1989) ‘Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 24 (4): 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. and Rosenbloom, R.S. (1997) ‘Technology strategy: an evolutionary process perspective’, in M. Tushman and P. Anderson (eds.) Managing Strategic Innovation and Change, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp: 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (1988) A Statistician's Guide, Chapman & Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coff, R.W. (1999) ‘When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: the resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power’, Organization Science 10 (1): 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. (1957) ‘The concept of power’, Behavioral Science 2 (3): 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. and Prahalad, C.K. (1981) ‘Headquarters’ influence and strategic control in MNCs’, Sloan Management Review 23 (1): 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. and Prahalad, C.K. (1993) ‘Managing DMNCs: a search for a new paradigm’, in S. Ghoshal and D.E. Westney (eds.) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, St Martin's Press: New York, pp: 24–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egelhoff, W.G. (1988) Organizing the Multinational Enterprise: An Information-Processing Perspective, Ballinger: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1962) ‘Power-dependence relations’, American Sociological Review 27 (1): 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A. (2000) ‘The underpinnings of “bureaucratic” control systems: HRM in European multinationals’, Journal of Management Studies 37 (4): 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A. and Edwards, P. (1995) ‘Power and the diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 1 (2): 229–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. (ed.) (1997) Understanding Business Markets, Dryden Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M. (1989) Managing the Internationalization Process: The Swedish Case, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M. (1997) ‘The advantage paradox of the multinational corporation’, in I. Björkman and M. Forsgren (eds.) The Nature of the International Firm, Copenhagen Business School Press: Copenhagen, pp: 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Johanson, J. and Sharma, D.D. (2000) ‘Development of MNC centers of excellence’, in U. Holm and T. Pedersen (eds.) The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centers of Excellence, Macmillan: London, pp: 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Pedersen, T. and Foss, N.J. (1999) ‘Accounting for the strengths of MNC subsidiaries: the case of foreign-owned firms in Denmark’, International Business Review 8 (2): 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, K., Foss, N.J. and Vázquez, X.H. (2006) ‘“Tying the manager's hands”: constraining opportunistic managerial intervention’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (5): 797–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J. and Pedersen, T. (2002) ‘Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context’, Journal of International Management 8 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R. (1973) Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D.C. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1996) ‘The evolution of intracorporate domains: divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations’, Organization Science 7 (3): 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, M., Williams, K. and Matten, D. (2003) ‘The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: an Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice’, Journal of Management Studies 40 (3): 617–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C.A. (1990) ‘The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network’, Academy of Management Review 15 (4): 603–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and Nohria, N. (1997) The Differentiated MNC: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998) ‘Alliances and networks’, Strategic Management Journal 19 (4): 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000) ‘Strategic networks’, Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V. (1991) ‘Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations’, Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 768–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. (1995) Developing Relationships in Business Networks, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1992) ‘Balancing corporate power: a new federalist paper’, Harvard Business Review 70 (6): 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1980) ‘The role of foreign subsidiaries in strategic decision making in Swedish companies’, Strategic Management Journal 1 (1): 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1986) ‘The hypermodern MNC: a heterarchy?’ Human Resource Management 25 (1): 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.F. (1991) ‘Control in multinational firms: the role of price and hierarchy’, Management International Review 30 (1): 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1993) LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1990) ‘Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition and power in organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (2): 342–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, P.H. and Zeitlin, J. (2001) ‘The making of a global firm: local pathways to multinational enterprise’, in G. Morgan, P.H. Kristensen and R. Whitley (eds.) The Multinational Firm, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp: 172–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998) ‘Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning’, Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, Macmillan: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1968) Industrial Research and Technological Innovation, W.W. Norton: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. (1966) ‘The power of power’, in D. Easton (ed.) Varieties of Political Theory, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp: 39–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B. and Zaheer, A. (1999) ‘Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 20 (12): 1133–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medcof, J.W. (2001) ‘Resource-based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units’, Strategic Management Journal 22 (11): 999–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, S. (1983) ‘Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large American corporations’, Academy of Management Review 8 (3): 426–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W. and Whitley, R. (2003) ‘Introduction to special issue’, Journal of Management Studies 40 (3): 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. (1996) ‘Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer’, Strategic Management Journal 17 (Special Issue): 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. (1999) ‘MNE internal capital markets and subsidiary strategic independence’, International Business Review 8 (2): 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. (2004) ‘Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs’, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (5): 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, S.W. (2000) ‘Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network?’ Strategic Management Journal 21 (5): 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in Organizations, Pitman: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1987) ‘Bringing the environment back in: the social context of business strategy’, in D.J. Teece (ed.) The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Ballinger: Cambridge, MA, pp: 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1983) ‘The technological dimension of competitive strategy’, in R.S. Rosenbloom (ed.) Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 1, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, pp: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K.G. (1983) ‘The federation as an interorganizational linkage network’, Academy of Management Review 8 (1): 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R.G. and Zingales, L. (1998) ‘Power in a theory of the firm’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 367–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G.B. and Pfeffer, J. (1977) ‘Who gets power—and how they hold on to it: a strategic-contingency model of power’, Organizational Dynamics 5 (3): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarfstein, D. and Stein, J.C. (2000) ‘The dark side of internal capital markets: divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment’, Journal of Finance 55 (6): 2537–2564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J.M. and Wells, L.T. (1972) Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiaries, Longman: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996) ‘The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect’, American Sociological Review 61 (4): 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. and Tavares, A.T. (2004) ‘Centralization and autonomy: back to the future’, International Business Review 13 (2): 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers, the Departmental Editor Nicolai J. Foss, and seminar participants at the Fox School of Business, Temple University and IIB at Stockholm School of Economics for comments on earlier drafts. The usual disclaimer applies. We also greatly appreciate the financial support from Handelsbankens Research Foundations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden

    Ulf Andersson, Mats Forsgren & Ulf Holm

Authors
  1. Ulf Andersson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mats Forsgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulf Holm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Andersson.

Additional information

Accepted by Nicolai Juul Foss, Departmental Editor, 3 October 2006. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. & Holm, U. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view. J Int Bus Stud 38, 802–818 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400292

Keywords

Search

Navigation